TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Tesla Turns Off AEB In New Cars Produced Since July

Discussion in 'Model S' started by Economite, Sep 10, 2017.

  1. Economite

    Economite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2016
    Messages:
    146
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    • Informative x 1
  2. Ghosty

    Ghosty Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    71
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    This has safety written all over it. Tesla - for one reason or another - feels it is necessary to deactivate a feature once thought safe. This is convenient for all people since it prevents the typical ICE recall of a car. They deactivate - investigate a bit more - and then decide whether there needs to be a recall or a software update is necessary.

    This is great for consumers. Demanding perfect is simply unattainable.
     
    • Like x 8
    • Disagree x 7
    • Informative x 1
    • Funny x 1
  3. McRat

    McRat Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    3,855
    Location:
    Norco, CA
    From reading owner reports, I often wondered if they didn't need to rethink their AEB technology.
     
    • Like x 2
  4. McRat

    McRat Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    3,855
    Location:
    Norco, CA
    If AEB was 50% effective in reducing collision speeds to survivable levels, you think car occupants are better with it disabled completely?
     
    • Like x 3
  5. Economite

    Economite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2016
    Messages:
    146
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Great for consumers would be not installing a new version of safety critical hardware (in place of a working version) until after the new version has been fully tested. That's what other manufacturers try to do.
     
    • Like x 14
    • Disagree x 1
    • Funny x 1
  6. Ghosty

    Ghosty Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    71
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    I'm pretty certain a company like Tesla didn't just pull this out of no where and - without considering safety - they just - on a whim - decided to turn off this feature for select cars.

    They made a decision - based on the information they have - to turn off this feature for 6 weeks - maybe less. Unlike ICE cars - where if a defect is found - people are left to find out - wait for a letter by mail - and then wait for them to take the vehicle in to a dealer. Archaic.
     
    • Like x 4
    • Disagree x 1
  7. brkaus

    brkaus Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,963
    AP2.5??
     
    • Like x 1
  8. Swift

    Swift Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Messages:
    277
    Location:
    NY
    Tesla is a mess. AEB, EAP, FSD. It either doesn’t work right, is incomplete, or in limbo. At least we didn’t pay extra for AEB.
     
    • Like x 6
    • Disagree x 4
    • Helpful x 1
  9. Swift

    Swift Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Messages:
    277
    Location:
    NY
    Agreed. That would make the most sense.
     
  10. AmpedRealtor

    AmpedRealtor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2013
    Messages:
    5,367
    Location:
    Buckeye, AZ
    Yet more proof that Tesla is utterly incapable of performing the kind of thorough testing and feature validation done by established automakers. There is no positive spin to this no matter how hard you try.
     
    • Like x 19
    • Disagree x 4
    • Helpful x 1
  11. bswn1

    bswn1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2016
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    CA
    This due to the installation of the new Continental radars in the new AP suite. They require real-world validation since AEB is radar only. This isn't due to a "defect" found in select cars with existing hardware.
     
    • Informative x 12
    • Like x 5
    • Helpful x 3
  12. Economite

    Economite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2016
    Messages:
    146
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    True.... But AEB is a passive safety feature. Not a convenience feature like EAP (no comment on what FSD is, since the darn thing doesn't actually exist). Also, EAP and FSD were (more or less) sold as "this doesn't work yet" features, while AEB is (for the most part) sold as an "already here" feature.

    Selling people cars with a passive safety feature, and then taking it away "for validation" is a big, big deal. Especially if, as is likely, this was done as part of a planned phase-in/test strategy.
     
    • Like x 3
    • Disagree x 2
  13. bro1999

    bro1999 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2016
    Messages:
    946
    Location:
    Maryland
    Yeah, I was about to say "Umm..... isn't this the kind of stuff you test BEFORE releasing cars to the public?"
    This isn't some minor thing like a new font for the display or something.
     
    • Like x 11
  14. RDoc

    RDoc S85D

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,749
    Location:
    Boston North Shore
    So who installed this rogue radar unit without letting Tesla have a chance to do any real world testing?

    The Russians, Kim Jong Un, the Big Bad Wolf, Donald Trump?
     
    • Funny x 12
    • Like x 4
  15. Swift

    Swift Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Messages:
    277
    Location:
    NY
    Agreed except EAP was to be done by 12/16 (they’ve since changed the wording on the order page) and Elon gave a time frame of 3 to 6 months on FSD feature rollout in 1/17.

    AEB on HW2 has never fully worked so they are leaving us with an incomplete feature and taking said incomplete feature away from the HW2.5 cars.
     
    • Helpful x 1
    • Like x 1
  16. Economite

    Economite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2016
    Messages:
    146
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Yah... Don't get me wrong... I think what they did with EAP/FSD borders on fraud and constitutes an unfair business practice.

    I just think this pulling of AEB is even worse.
     
    • Love x 3
  17. bswn1

    bswn1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2016
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    CA
    I don't understand what you mean. This is how all other AP hardware has been validated... with real world regression testing over millions of miles in thousands of different environments.

    Why would this be any different?
     
    • Like x 2
    • Informative x 1
  18. jddssc121

    jddssc121 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2017
    Messages:
    87
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    and they're still advertising it as a feature on their website......
     
    • Like x 2
  19. dhanson865

    dhanson865 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    2,097
    Location:
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    and yet if you gave me a Model S of any year with all those features turned off it'd still be the best car I've ever owned.

    Safer in a crash than any car I've ever crashed.

    Better range than any pure EV I've ever driven.

    If I had one I'd gladly drive it even with AEB and Collision Avoidance totally disabled for eternity.
     
    • Love x 4
    • Like x 3
  20. Kanting

    Kanting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2016
    Messages:
    164
    Location:
    United States
    Don't worry. Someone will come up with a new Google shared spreadsheet to track those old firmware features. Then when HW3 comes with LiDAR, there will be another one. C'est la vie, beta testers!
     
    • Like x 3

Share This Page