So, I've been trying out TeslaFi and Teslastics today and comparing the end results.
It seems like Teslastics is actually more accurate at capturing what really happened in a drive. I've attached two screenshots showing a drive I did this afternoon. In that drive, there are two bursts of acceleration as I entered a short stretch of dual carriageway, then turned around at the bottom and returned in the other direction. Teslastics captures this accurately, whereas TeslaFi is completely missing the outward run.
The outward run is at 17:40:30 and the return is at 17:42:00. It appears that Teslastics has a much better sampling interval. Has anyone else done any comparisons of the two apps?
It seems like Teslastics is actually more accurate at capturing what really happened in a drive. I've attached two screenshots showing a drive I did this afternoon. In that drive, there are two bursts of acceleration as I entered a short stretch of dual carriageway, then turned around at the bottom and returned in the other direction. Teslastics captures this accurately, whereas TeslaFi is completely missing the outward run.
The outward run is at 17:40:30 and the return is at 17:42:00. It appears that Teslastics has a much better sampling interval. Has anyone else done any comparisons of the two apps?