S4WRXTTCS
Well-Known Member
Agree 100%
I agree as well. There is a danger in it trying to be smarter than the data it actually has to go off of.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree 100%
Because driver is still responsible (not autonomous yet), the AS should not fight the driver, driver should take over naturally/instinctively.The steering motor can probably overpower any human. The only reason it doesn't is because the torque sensors, which I assume are exactly the same that are used for electric assist steering along with some code don't let it. Thus you should be able to limit the amount of torque needed to override without having the computer give up completely.
If implemented this should feel like while your hand is on the wheel you're driving but maybe getting gently nudged. If you take your hands of the wheel, computer has full authority.
It should be 100% suggestible, without AP disengaging if you pull it too far. The whole disengage by steering input thing is just a terrible human interface design.
I don't want to have to try to grab for a button or stalk to disengage the AP if it goes berserk and I need to override. I want to be able to resume manual steering by turning the wheel.
This I think is the intuitive way when faced with an emergency condition.I don't want to have to try to grab for a button or stalk to disengage the AP if it goes berserk and I need to override. I want to be able to resume manual steering by turning the wheel.
This I think is the intuitive way when faced with an emergency condition.
Try explaining it in layman's term.Still, missing the point. I guess it's just hard to understand.
Try explaining it in layman's term.
For example, if I have AS on, but I see that it is going to drive into an open manhole, what would the car do? What should I do instinctively?
I am not nitpicking but just want to get full understanding.So the car without any fancy stuff, with a proper alignment on a flat road always aims for center, right? If you let go of the wheel while off-center, it's turns back to center on it's own. Is it hard to take control and steer it while the car is driving straight? Do you have to exert a lot of pressure? No, thanks to power steering.
So AP when engaged should always aim for center of lane with an equivalent feedback force to the driver. A driver input while AP is engaged should take very little, if any additional effort over normal steering. A little feedback would give you the same thing as "road feel", but in this case "AP feel".
To answer your question: If you see the car heading into a manhole you do the same thing you would do if no AP existed. It is no harder.
Yes, and AP should simply redefine "center".I am not nitpicking but just want to get full understanding.
1. With proper alignment, the car does not know how to aim for the center, it aims straight (due to wheel caster) whether center of the lane/road or not, assuming road camber is not a factor. Yes, it takes little or no effort to maintain straight run, power steering or not. If by center, you mean the steering wheel is driving straight, then we have agreement.
More allowance is allowed before AP disengages now, yes. With 7.0 AP would simple disengage, regardless of ping-pong. Take that change and go another lightyear with it.2. AS aiming for the center of the lane depends on the camera for lane marking. However, as some of us (including me) observed, the car ping-pongs. The reason it ping-pong is irrelevant to this discussion. I can feel the AS doing the ping-pong by the feedback on the wheel, and that is also how my hand resisting the ping-pong tells the AS my hand is on wheel, by torque sensing, up to the extend I tolerate the ping-pong. I can overcome the AS any time by applying higher torque than what AS has been programmed for hand on wheel detection.
Again missed the point. Avoiding the manhole cover while AP is aiming for it should be NO DIFFERENT than avoiding a manhole cover if driving straight and on-center in normal mode. AP should merely redefine the center return position. You let go of the wheel, it should return to AP's path-defined center instead of a mechanically defined center via caster. You should never fight AP, unlike you do now.3. If the open manhole happens to be on the path of the wheel. The AS maintaining direction will drive over it, resulting in possible damage to the tire/wheel.
4. If the open manhole is coming up very quickly, and I want to take over the steering, I apply manual steering to avoid the manhole with enough torque and AS give up control so as not to resist my emergency maneuver. My emergency maneuver might include crossing the lane (if safe to do so by my judgement) which is contrary to what AS might do if still engaged.
Based on 3 and 4, the current implementation of AS to disengage is what I want.
Does any other ADAS equipped car (e.g. MB or BMW) do it your RIGHT and ELEGANT way?I'm wondering right now why I'm re-engineering Tesla's solution to work *RIGHT* and *ELEGANTLY*, these are supposed to be the smart engineers.
I'm wondering right now why I'm re-engineering Tesla's solution to work *RIGHT* and *ELEGANTLY*, these are supposed to be the smart engineers.
Would be nice to know. Do you know if any other ADAS equipped car can do what AWDtsla envisioned?So - why do you think they did not set it up the way you think it should be?
It actually seems to make some pretty complex decisions on this already. Note the image I posted in my hacking thread:
I know this is an older pic, but I really want to see this data in my car with AP enabled. Any chance us "regular people" would have a non-warranty voiding way to see this? I think it would be fascinating.