You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree that the BMW add is poorly done and counter-productive.
Keep in mind that the German car manufactures plan to migrate to EVs.
Porsche and others will be serious competitors in 5 + years... watch out
Should you go 76 mph though, the ICE kicks on at a range of zero.
None of the divisions were 'starved' except for perhaps Pontiac/QUOTE]
GM spent ~$15B on Saturn. That money came out of the other divisions. Even for GM that is a lot of money. This is when they had another major loss of market share vs the Japanese. Oldsmobile,Pontiac, and Chevrolet cars but not trucks were starved.
Porsche and others will be serious competitors in 5 + years... watch out
Actually I don't agree. They have been in the EV business for a good few years and they have proven beyond doubt that they are incapable of doing great EVs. It is basic logic. If you are in a certain market why not do the best possible car - isn't that what competition all about? The problem is deep rooted in the culture of a company like BMW and you can see even their fans in this forum going all out to try prove that a true performance ICE is no match for an EV. You just cannot come up with a good EV with an attitude like that and at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what BMW or their fans try to say, the proof is in the pudding.
I thought the advert was Tesla Vs plug-in BMWFor EVs, sure, but in the broader automobile market, they are not in the same league as Toyota, VAG, etc. yet in terms of volume or revenue. The most revealing thing about this ad campaign is that they don't line up the Model 3 against their "i" sub-brand but instead against their core 3 Series cars. The mistake that BMW has made is that, as the challenger, Tesla would have had to justify parity with the 3 Series and BMW could have disputed that. Instead, BMW has done the Tesla's work for them.
Yup. They'll be serious competition for the Tesla of today in five years.
For the cars Tesla builds five years from now? I doubt it.
If we start from the average car use of 40 miles per day, then reduction of petrol use by ~ 1/3rd is far from pathetic in the world of ICE.It's not snobbery...20 miles would be pathetic enough, but it's only rated at 14 miles of AER. No doubt some people have short enough commutes to make it work, but the vast majority do not.
If we start from the average car use of 40 miles per day, then reduction of petrol use by ~ 1/3rd is far from pathetic in the world of ICE.
Honestly, it is ridiculous to spend time snarking about the BMW plug-in and ignoring the BMW conventional ICE. I am not a conventional BMW potential customer so their plug-in does not interest me, but I can well imagine people who will buy a BMW and will consider the plug-in for road privileges. If that EV experience is positive they might demand more the next car around.
Learn from EM: *EVs that appeal to *any* niche raise the tide overall.
14 miles gets me just past halfway to work. You likely lose more carrying around the battery than you gain.It's not snobbery...20 miles would be pathetic enough, but it's only rated at 14 miles of AER. No doubt some people have short enough commutes to make it work, but the vast majority do not.
This is actually really stupid of BMW because most of the world still has no idea about Tesla and certainly not its Model 3. BMW just potentially piqued the interest of thousands of people.
The people on this forum either bought, or plan to buy a Tesla. Leave the partial EVs to people who otherwise will buy a straight, 17 mpg ICE.The problem is people on this forum are tired of waiting. They want BMW to stop trickling water and raise that tide with a FLOOD!
What BMW is doing is very little to quench the people's thirst. All they're doing is increasing demand, yet doing little to increase the supply.
BMW conventional ICE is ignored because it's irrelevant. As others have pointed out, why are they pitting a hybrid against an EV? Why didn't BMW pit their i3 against Tesla?
BMW is repeating GM's mistake/lie. Try to sell the people an orange (hybrid) when what they want is an apple (EV). Again, the people's reaction is: WTF?!
Pure BEV Dogma
If we start from the average car use of 40 miles per day, then reduction of petrol use by ~ 1/3rd is far from pathetic in the world of ICE.
Honestly, it is ridiculous to spend time snarking about the BMW plug-in and ignoring the BMW conventional ICE. I am not a conventional BMW potential customer so their plug-in does not interest me, but I can well imagine people who want to buy a BMW and will consider the plug-in for road privileges. If that EV experience is positive they might demand more the next car around.
Learn from EM: *EVs that appeal to *any* niche raise the tide overall.
Yeah! Didn't you know USED cars is where the money is!