Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

THE MOMENT TESLA BECOMES PROFITABLE IS CLOSER THAN YOU THINK

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Elon musk has "big steel balls” -Justine Musk (Ex-wife)
In order to create on a scale as large as Musk does a person would certainly need them. The courage to lay your finances on the line in 2008, and push forward through seemingly insurmountable odds and self doubt, makes Elon Musk an incredible story of entrepreneurism in the 21st century. Scores of analysts and researchers, writers, and bloggers have commented upon his rise at length over the years. Several naysayers have pointed out that through a series of happy mistakes Elon has managed to hold off investors, consumers, regulators, and pull the blinders over the eyes of the investment community. With a stock price that several financial analysts have called divorced from reality, the story of the rise of Tesla certainly is worth reviewing and combing over. The company history has been well-documented and written about ad nauseam, I however want the focus of this piece to be more about the upcoming "moment of leverage" or the sea-change that Tesla will hit this year, and why this pivotal point is the true moment of the Elon Musk genius that has taken the world auto industry by such surprise, that even BMW is showing their employees propaganda films featuring Musk and Co.

2017 has been a tremendous year of growth for Tesla. Already well on their way to producing 100k cars this year alone, they have gone from a boutique automaker selling cars to the rich, to a mass market auto manufacturer with their first affordable EV the Model 3 due in July. They have increased the number of their stores, Service Centers, level 2 chargers and superchargers by a large percentage in anticipation of this momentous time. For the first time, the market will have access to a sexy, affordable, long-range EV. At last public count, almost 400k people have made a $1000 reservation for the model 3. However, the big moment of leverage will not be with the model 3 arrives later this year, the make or break moment has already happened.
The brilliance of the super charger network has only recently been discovered by the likes of GM. The industry has been watching with bated breath to see what will happen with the first affordable 200+ mile Electric Vehicle. Sales have been lackluster and rollout has been slow. Whether GM is throttling their production of the Bolt, or they simply aren’t selling because a person can’t charge them on a robust charging network remains to be seen. Sales are plateauing and everyone will tell you a different reason. Analysts postulate that its because there is no national charging network with a quality of use like Teslas. The Proprietary Tesla Super-charger network originally deployed in North America and Europe, has been, what some analysts call, the single most important advantage that Tesla holds in the EV market. The ability to turn your electric vehicle into a cross-country capable mode of transportation was really the last limiting factor that kept EV’s from mass adoption. Tesla has plans to deploy an additional 5000 supercharger stalls around the world by the end of this year bringing the total number to over 10k. This is a huge moment of leverage for the business. Not only has Tesla built this network all over the world, they have, starting in the 2nd quarter of this year, monetized it. New Tesla owners will receive about 1000 miles of free charge each year, and then pay for their additional use. This event will take the supercharger network, which was a money loser for Tesla, and turn each station into a cash register for Tesla. Not only will each new Tesla be able to use the charger, the customer will be able to pay online, or via their vehicle Link System. So, unlike a traditional gas station that needs an attendant, Tesla has created a chain of 10,000 autonomous "cash registers." These supercharger stations will soon be located in city centers and you can be sure that Tesla will encourage their customers to use them as often as they like. This event takes this drain on Tesla’s finances and turns it into a net positive. Now Tesla has said that they will not create a profit center around their supercharger network but rest assured, Tesla is not run by a bunch of Nuns. They have to continue their mission, and you can bet that each supercharger station will pencil out in the long run. Elon and Tesla have created a huge “Next Generation Gas station” right under the noses of the fossil Fuel industry, all over the world. And as of April this year, they have been monetized. The cash drain will become a cash gain, and will only pick up steam as more cars are sold. Every car sold before April of 2017 has a shelf life. Older cars that have unlimited supercharging for life, will leave the road over the next several decades, the super charger network will become more and more profitable. Game changed. This is the Facebook story all over again, where the founders didn’t think they should monetize and start ads on the site until the time was right. Tesla waited until the network was robust enough and then monetized it. Brilliant play.

Tesla has been criticized by several analysts for not expanding the service centers quickly enough to keep up with demand. I would postulate that they simply haven’t been able to due to cash constraints. How do you start a successful car company from the ground up, and service all of those cars? Service Centers are no doubt very expensive to open, probably over $500,000 for each center alone, when you factor equipment installation, real estate expenses, and construction costs. Some estimates are much higher. Elon Musk has been quoted as spending several Million dollars on the first Galllery Store in Santa Monica. These service centers are brick and mortar locations which are expensive and rarely contribute to sales of vehicles like a Gallery store would. However, these facilities are going to start to be massive profit centers for Tesla in the near future. As Tesla has been a new car company, with the first Model S deliveries in 2012, most of these cars have been under bumper to bumper warranty since. Each repair that had to be performed has come out of Tesla’s pocket. This Reuters article explains how the accounting works out:
"Last year, according to a Reuters analysis of data provided in the company's annual report, Tesla spent $1,043 per vehicle on actual repairs and set aside $2,036 in warranty accruals to cover future repairs on the vehicles it sold in 2015. It trimmed warranty expenses by 17 percent from 2014 and cut warranty accruals by 34 percent."
-High warranty costs reflect Tesla’s struggle with quality

If those estimates are to be believed, Tesla is doing a whole lot to improve their warranty repair costs. But additionally, the other huge sea change in Tesla’s favor is that a large portion of the fleet will now start to exit their warranty windows. With 2400 vehicles delivered in 2012, 22,450 in 2013, 31,655 in 2014, and up from their, a greater and greater number of vehicles are starting to need uncovered maintenance work. While the average American car is driven 13,500 miles per year, a tsunami of non-warranty repairs, and driver’s maintenance costs are coming the way of the Tesla Service centers. This will obviously help the bottom line of Tesla in a major way at least enough to be a game changer for this segment of their business. Each day a greater and greater number of cars passes that 50k bumper to bumper warranty, and goes into the land of black for Tesla. Nobody is talking about this! Bob Lutz who was the former GM Vice-Chairman, and pusher of the GM volt, has famously gone on record about how insane it was for Tesla to try and own their own stores. GM tried it and it didn’t work. But for ICE dealerships, the greatest profit center is the service center. Why wouldn’t Tesla want to be in that business as well? Reading several internet forums, the cost of maintenance on an EV is less than an ICE car, however, there are still costs associated with owning ANY car. Again, the huge sea-change here is that for the first time, the aging Tesla fleet is going to be putting dollar bills into the cash register and not take money out on warranty repairs. Tesla has created a HUGE “dealership” network right under the noses of the existing car manufacturers, and now for the first time, they have profitable repairs to make en masse. Tesla was forced to wait until the fleet aged, but now, short of a massive recall, each quarter should see the service centers be a larger and larger profit center. Elon has sworn on conference calls that they don’t want to make any money off of their service centers, but looking at the cost of the preferred maintenance plans it is easy to see how Tesla can and will.
These two factors are going to be the greatest contributors to the bottom line going forward for Tesla. We will continue to watch with great anticipation as this teenage company continues its incredible year-over-year growth. Starting a car company from scratch is a monumental feat. Starting a profitable car company is a greater one. These two factors will be the game changer that takes Tesla to profitability sooner than you think!
 
As someone deeply involved in running a Large Luxury brand service center for the past years it's easy to see how Tesla will need to expand service capacity and naturally they will profit from taking proper care of the thousands of owners out there. Good service commands a premium price and profit is a byproduct.
Hopefully they move to add large capacity centers of 40 to 60 plus bays. No one except Elon expects the service to show no profit and as we have seen he can change his mind. The good news is a profitable service operation is critical to providing top level service and sales support.
Well run and staffed SC's are a Very important part of the Tesla brand experience, and will be a large profit center in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bhzmark
I have heard about service parts supply issues and it's troubling as that's the area I work in.
A lot of smart people at Tesla you would think they could set up a decent distribution system for parts.
Perhaps it's managing the supply of service parts that's giving them issues, many things are easy to predict ( windshields!) while others like emergency brake recalls are not.
 
@jstoneman I am not convinced that the Supercharger network is going to generate a significant profit for Tesla. If you had numbers to back up your assertions it would be more compelling. Tesla has said in the past that the cost to build and operate the Supercharger network is so relatively small that they don't break it out separately in their public financial reports.

The Model 3 and the future Model Y may well result in the Supercharger network being profitable. How significant those profits will be is an open question at this point. Many people charge at home and rarely make long trips. Many people cannot charge at home for various reasons and will need to charge somewhere else. In the future workplaces that offer charging for employees may become much more common. As wind and solar drive down electrical costs, selling electricity may become less profitable (in some places in the Midwest electrical rates at night have dropped to zero). There are a lot of variable here that are hard to model and predict trends over the next decade.

If the Supercharger network just breaks even that will be a tremendous accomplishment for Tesla. It remains a significant competitive advantage that is not generally appreciated.
This event will take the supercharger network, which was a money loser for Tesla, and turn each station into a cash register for Tesla. Not only will each new Tesla be able to use the charger, the customer will be able to pay online, or via their vehicle Link System. So, unlike a traditional gas station that needs an attendant, Tesla has created a chain of 10,000 autonomous "cash registers." These supercharger stations will soon be located in city centers and you can be sure that Tesla will encourage their customers to use them as often as they like. This event takes this drain on Tesla’s finances and turns it into a net positive. Now Tesla has said that they will not create a profit center around their supercharger network but rest assured, Tesla is not run by a bunch of Nuns. They have to continue their mission, and you can bet that each supercharger station will pencil out in the long run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pbceng
American car is driven 13,500 miles per year, a tsunami of non-warranty repairs, and driver’s maintenance costs are coming the way of the Tesla Service centers. This will obviously help the bottom line of Tesla in a major way at least enough to be a game changer for this segment of their business.

This is something that I think many, including myself, have been overlooking. Someone once posted, and I apologize because I cannot remember who, that when you look at evaluation of Tesla vs GM, you really should be comparing Tesla + 220 store/service vs GM and its dealer network because Tesla will have a positive net value from its service network and GM does not. As a matter of fact, GM has to have a small carve out in its retail price for the dealership. Currently the service network has been a negative drag on profits but as the OP has noted, this should start to flip soon. One thing the OP has left out is that the number of cars needing warranty work is going to go up a lot over the next 18 months. The hope is that the Model 3 is actually a simpler car and does not require as much warranty work along with improved build quality from the simpler car as well. But in general the service network should become less and less of a drag on profits and be a net positive. I know Tesla is not aiming for the service network to major profit center, but at least it can support it self in terms of paying for the expansion and paying for the work it does with revenues and a small net profit.
 
Service centers will be heavily biased towards warranty work during rapid growth. What percentage of total Tesla's built are under warranty in 2017. How about 2019? The model 3 makes the percentage worse. Absolute dollars don't matter, on percent waranty vs. paid work.

By the time Tesla reaches half of BMW's size they will not have a monopoly on repairs and some repair parts.
 
Great analogy. You have made Elon a bit more predictable for me.

To continue the analogy, Elon Musk sees the great pot odds, so he plays high stakes and pushes his bankroll to the limit.

But back to the OP, I don't see near-term profitability for Tesla, although they'll want to improve their cash flow. They still have plenty of expansion to do.
 
Last edited:
I don't get it why it matter so much that Tesla need to be profitable asap compare with the fact the most important matter is occupied the EV market and get more profitability in the long run.
I know it's matters to Walt Street or shorter who expect Tesla to fail. If you are supporter of Tesla, profitability should not be your concern rather the progress of Model 3 ramp up.
Elon is right about the fact the most important product for Tesla is not cars, it's the factory, along with the value of Supercharger network.
In term of warranty cost, you should know it will be much better in future Tesla product than Model S/X, future model will be much simpler, and Tesla is getting better on selecting supplier. I'm not making this up, just look at the improvement on Model X over last 12-24 month.
 
berserk, the one implication is that they make it to the long run by laying down tens of Billions of USD in debt to do it and then take decades to pay it back. The game is about leveraging of the now versus building a plan for sustainable profitability.
 
berserk, the one implication is that they make it to the long run by laying down tens of Billions of USD in debt to do it and then take decades to pay it back. The game is about leveraging of the now versus building a plan for sustainable profitability.
I'd like to see the number about the revenue estimation when Tesla dominate EV market with mass production Model 3 & Y, Semi, and also Solar Roof and Power wall, then we can talk about how much time Tesla need to pay off the debt.
Funny, the same people who are so worry about Tesla profitability believe Tesla will lose to traditional auto-maker simply because these auto-maker being in the auto industry for long time. Despite the fact these company will not even going to consider building EV in any time soon without Tesla. And they are so far behind on battery production volume, efficiency and charging infrastructure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bhzmark
I'd like to see the number about the revenue estimation when Tesla dominate EV market with mass production Model 3 & Y, Semi, and also Solar Roof and Power wall, then we can talk about how much time Tesla need to pay off the debt.
Funny, the same people who are so worry about Tesla profitability believe Tesla will lose to traditional auto-maker simply because these auto-maker being in the auto industry for long time. Despite the fact these company will not even going to consider building EV in any time soon without Tesla. And they are so far behind on battery production volume, efficiency and charging infrastructure.

Actually, what you lay out are beliefs, perhaps shared among Tesla "fans" but not founded in reality. China has numerous "gigafactory" type constructions going on. VW is implying on electrifying a lot of models and working with battery factories. Daimler also has similar plans. GM says they want to have like 20 electric models by 2023. there's a lot going on. The only thing holding "everybody back" was cost economics. If people want EVs, and they can be made to cost the same as ICE cars, and there is good public charging and cost-effectiveness with the decision to buy EV, then everyone (buyers and sellers) will establish an economic model for the solution. It is VERY early in the overall move to electrics and in fact no - it is not economically better to choose a New EV over a New gas car at this time (at least in the USA where fuel prices are manageable). I want to see EV growth - i just do not believe it will happen as quickly as all the "fans" of the technologies think it will. I believe and always have believed in slow, steady adoption rates. Growth curves more "controlled and flat" rather than exponential (a favorite term among those who believe profoundly that it will grow at some amazing rate).

Keep the faith and keep believing and with all EV buyers telling their friends about their experiences, maybe friends and family start to purchase more of them. However, be aware that in the USA, many people live paycheck to paycheck and such decisions MUST be affordable.
 
Actually, what you lay out are beliefs, perhaps shared among Tesla "fans" but not founded in reality. China has numerous "gigafactory" type constructions going on. VW is implying on electrifying a lot of models and working with battery factories. Daimler also has similar plans. GM says they want to have like 20 electric models by 2023. there's a lot going on. The only thing holding "everybody back" was cost economics. If people want EVs, and they can be made to cost the same as ICE cars, and there is good public charging and cost-effectiveness with the decision to buy EV, then everyone (buyers and sellers) will establish an economic model for the solution. It is VERY early in the overall move to electrics and in fact no - it is not economically better to choose a New EV over a New gas car at this time (at least in the USA where fuel prices are manageable). I want to see EV growth - i just do not believe it will happen as quickly as all the "fans" of the technologies think it will. I believe and always have believed in slow, steady adoption rates. Growth curves more "controlled and flat" rather than exponential (a favorite term among those who believe profoundly that it will grow at some amazing rate).

Keep the faith and keep believing and with all EV buyers telling their friends about their experiences, maybe friends and family start to purchase more of them. However, be aware that in the USA, many people live paycheck to paycheck and such decisions MUST be affordable.

Most of you said are common among Tesla "skeptical" voice, the problem is that they are give too much credit to the claims purely in the air than what Tesla is actually doing. I'm still remember that people believe Faraday Future is another Tesla, and a start up with around 100 people can come up real threat to Tesla Semi. Do you really believes China can produce something to compete with Tesla? Do you even check out product like BYD E6 and 秦, 宋, 唐 Model in China? GM said that it will have 20 models, my questions is what's GM's giga factory to support the production of that? Same as European manufactures, the earliest of their products will hit market by the end of year, and most of other product will be around 2020. By that time, Tesla already finished ramp up of Model 3 and Y, and Giga factory is finished. Because the fully automated production line, Tesla will have the lowest production cost on the market which mean Tesla will have better and cheaper product, there is no way other manufacture can even compete with it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bhzmark
I wouldn't talk about a GM GF yet - because Tesla is still doing permits to build its own out and output (completed battery pack production) is a limiting factor in car production now. These things take years and years. Over in China, they will do what works - they may sell fewer "exciting" cars but they will sell far more EVs in the population than US-based companies selling into China. For example, they sell a lot of NEVs (Neighborhood EVs) - which do exactly what they were designed for - getting around town. In the USA, we want 2-ton big cars which we really don't need. I'm waiting and watching but really think that yes, China will out-sell there perhaps as much as equal to the rest of the world as they evolve and grow. They will have numerous plants making battery cells and cars won't need 100 kWh on board but rather more like 30-40kWh for those in cities to get around. More cars = more "people in seats" and this is what the EV revolution is about - getting more people into EVs at lower and lower prices. I think growth will happen when VW and Daimler both turn on their growth engines and input the Billions that they have promised. This means worldwide EV sales can grow in many segments.

One thing not talked about is BYD coming to the USA. Warren Buffett is an investor and may want to see this happen. Tesla opened the door to such importing of cars because they bypass the dealership within states networks. So outsiders like BYD can come in on top of that.
 
I wouldn't talk about a GM GF yet - because Tesla is still doing permits to build its own out and output (completed battery pack production) is a limiting factor in car production now. These things take years and years. Over in China, they will do what works - they may sell fewer "exciting" cars but they will sell far more EVs in the population than US-based companies selling into China. For example, they sell a lot of NEVs (Neighborhood EVs) - which do exactly what they were designed for - getting around town. In the USA, we want 2-ton big cars which we really don't need. I'm waiting and watching but really think that yes, China will out-sell there perhaps as much as equal to the rest of the world as they evolve and grow. They will have numerous plants making battery cells and cars won't need 100 kWh on board but rather more like 30-40kWh for those in cities to get around. More cars = more "people in seats" and this is what the EV revolution is about - getting more people into EVs at lower and lower prices. I think growth will happen when VW and Daimler both turn on their growth engines and input the Billions that they have promised. This means worldwide EV sales can grow in many segments.

One thing not talked about is BYD coming to the USA. Warren Buffett is an investor and may want to see this happen. Tesla opened the door to such importing of cars because they bypass the dealership within states networks. So outsiders like BYD can come in on top of that.

Actually, I was not talking about GM, I mean in NA and Europe, are you really going to consider a BYD E6 over Model 3?
If you want to talk about China where I came from, the market is actually very divided, people are either going to buy most cost effective model or go for the high end. On the high end, there is no secret that Tesla dominate high end EV market. On the low end, I'm not so sure, it's really depends on how the expansion of Tesla factory in China goes.

BTW, about the European car manufactures, here is the news came out today:
Audi and Porsche talk about their new billion-dollar joint electric car platform

My estimation, they are 3-5 years behind Tesla current "Gen 3" platform.