TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

TheVerge Article on the "hype-gap" of self-driving cars

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by stealthology, Feb 21, 2016.

  1. ThosEM

    ThosEM Space Weatherman

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
    Messages:
    612
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    The more time Tesla spends on self-driving cars, the less it accomplishes toward its original master plan for sustainable transportation. This article is a breath of fresh air...
     
  2. jgs

    jgs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2014
    Messages:
    951
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
    It's not at all clear to me that self-driving is incidental to Tesla's mission, any more than making their cars beautiful and fun to drive is incidental. If you pare the mission down to its core, you could probably state it as "make all miles electric miles". At first I wrote that as "build electric cars everyone can afford" but I think that's actually wrong -- Tesla would achieve their goal better if they produced a smaller fleet of shared cars with a higher duty cycle. Why better? Because fewer resources expended to build, maintain and garage them. What does it take to move from an ownership model of cars to a shared-fleet model? Well, Uber seems to believe self-driving is key.

    So, is self-driving actually a distraction from the mission? I'm not so sure.

    (But yes, other things are Even More Important in the near-to-mid term, notably making the cars beautiful, fun, functional, and affordable.)
     
  3. hockeythug

    hockeythug Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,499
    Location:
    Minnesota
    ....
     
  4. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    15,914
    Location:
    Stanford, California
    With the headscratching exception of their communication, Tesla can walk and chew gum at the same time. Since basically every automaker is working on this, they'll need "self-driving" features to continue to be competitive as a car company. Electric alone isn't enough.

    That said, this Verge article spent a lot of words to say not much. The author seems to be in a tech "journalist" bubble. Without really understanding much about technology, his job is to regularly come up with things to write about. Outside of the TMC and tech blog bubble, the general public isn't thinking much about this technology, and when they do they figure it will arrive many years from now. So I feel like the author is venting more his personal frustration of having to write another self-driving car article where the improvements are too subtle to make interesting copy, rather than describing some real problem.
     
  5. Lex

    Lex Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    My summary: completely self-driving autonomous cars sure will take more than technology to get started, and while the tech keeps getting a bit better it's not going to be "shipping this year" any year (too) soon.

    And that's probably a good thing, call me old-fashioned but safety first, eh :smile:

    The thing here for us is that while Tesla may be investing thousands of hours per workday of engineering human power on totally autonomous vehicles, it seems we get to turn tomorrow's hype into today's very real stress relief with driver-monitored Autopilot.
     

Share This Page