You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The way it looks to me, buying leaps is gambling with the contract writer, who will try to set the premium to their own advantage. You're betting that you can anticipate the market movement better than they can. I'm confident that I cannot do that.
My understanding is that market makers price leaps based on the black schoolers pricing model, which has to do with ,time to expiry and past stock volatility, nothing in their pricing reflects the underlying business growth in sales volumes or margins
For example it does not price in going from 400,000 cars pa to $2m cars pa
So market makers are at distinct disadvantage
Happy to be corrected
Don't do anything yet. The stock is about to jump! There are big positives on the very near horizon. June 22nd report, S&P inclusion, battery day announcement etc. In my opinion, stock is about to jump in the next several months on the near term.
Plan your trades and trade your plan.
Do it. Sell em all!!!!
[...]
So - my take is that if your investment thesis hasn't changed, then there's no reason to change your investment. Why buy a lower quality investment using proceeds from a higher quality investment? [...]
Perhaps this falls into your category of a change in investment thesis, but at some point you want to decide whether to enjoy the money you've made, or keep it until you die and leave it to somebody else.
I pretty much agree with everything you've written above. Except that diversification is a part of my investment thesis. No matter how strong a company is, nothing in life is certain. There's always more risk with an individual company than with a diversified portfolio. Sometimes you want to include a lower-quality lower-risk investment in your portfolio. And I'm at an age where income is becoming more important than growth.
Eggs and baskets.
You're wise to sell part of your holdings.Yeah, about 2 or 3 hours after I sold almost 12% of my shares they jumped over $100. Well, it's water under the bridge. And this is the reason I'm not a day-trader. The fact is, I multiplied my money about 42 times. It would have been 47 times if I'd sold now. But I've still got about 88% of my former position.
And it's not a matter of justifying anything. As a conservative investor my position was uncomfortably large. I cashed in a small part of it at a 42 X profit. I can cry about losing $100 per share, or I can be happy about making $1,465 per share. I'll choose the latter. Life is good when you live in paradise.
... Though I don't invest in Berkshire, I've been very influenced by many of Buffet's investment strategies. One of them being to put your short list of high quality investment "eggs" into the basket, and then watch them like a hawk
What with unconstrained money printing and the fact that the only thing left that both Republicans and Democrats can agree on is ever more grandiose deficit spending, it seems likely that taxes will go up one way or another. By selling some now you will might get to keep more of your profit. Me, I am old, so my stock will go to my heirs just so it isn't all taxed away. At least until the politicians revive estate taxes or eliminate the rule allowing cost basis to reset to market for the inheritors of securities.
It sure is nice to have rich-people problems!
Reading your posts in this thread I was struck by the fact that your investment strategy is almost exactly like mine - long term index funds, living below your means, buying what you believe in, etc. If the tax ramifications of your investments aren't part of it yet, they will be in the future.
If you don't watch out you will become just another Capitalist Pig in Paradise with rich people problems.