HAHAHAHAHAHA!, HAHAHAHA!, HAHhahha, hehe, he...........oh wait, your serious?
Someone else agrees with me. i just saw this review.
You may hate Elon Musk, but the Cybertruck is good | Inverse
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!, HAHAHAHA!, HAHhahha, hehe, he...........oh wait, your serious?
This comment didn't age well... I reserved two and changed my profile pic... I have a more optimistic attitude of it this morning!
I don't think Tesla's mission is to sell niche novelty second or third toy vehicles to the rich. Most truck drivers drive them daily.My response to all the whiners:
Likely no one would have a Cybertruck as their "one and only" vehicle.
What kind of market share do you suppose they could of grabbed with a truck that was actually useful as a truck?If Tesla can grab 1% share just in the US (less than half of Nissan’s piece of the market with the Titan in 2018) with an average selling price of $50k, they get a $1.5B incremental revenue boost...doesn’t seem destined for commercial failure to me.
There is a saying I use a lot. I ain't good looking, but I'm something different.
Not here in California. If you can't load 4x8 plywood or drywall in the bed with tailgate up (so other smaller items stay in), it is not very useful.
And exactly where, in this stupid design, will they mount tool bins?
I don't think Tesla's mission is to sell niche novelty second or third toy vehicles to the rich. Most truck drivers drive them daily.
It’s amazing what simply eliminating some of the triangular body hiding the bed does to the visuals of the cybertruck.
View attachment 480078 View attachment 480079
better than 50% of contractors here in Atlanta have 6 1/2 beds.
Good point. That comment was really irrelevant so I removed it.
There's no reason this couldn't be driven daily. You'd wake up to a full tank and spend less fueling it than a some other truck which would cost $100 in California.
@mattjs33 - my man - long time no see.
How would this bad boy be at hauling around auto parts. Be honest.
That might not work. Here is an interesting article on structural issues when a truck is not body-on-frame.
Here’s why the Tesla Cybertruck has its crazy look – TechCrunch
Also, one key advantage of the rear design is it allows the moveable truck bed cover to be built in.
Yes, like fixing the glass. That was rather embarrassing.Watching Test drives and different angles has helped the initial "ugly" side profile that I couldn't swallow. Maybe the reveal was just suffering from poor lighting. Still looks like there are a lot of refinements that will be made.
How could it not be a joke? The shape bears no resemblance to reported test mules, and is nothing like the pickup in the "bed" of the Semi.
The most telling thing is the $100 deposit. When has any Tesla had a $100 deposit?
A lot of nonsense in this thread:
1. Only 20% of pickup truck sales have 8 foot beds. The rest are ~6.5 foot beds.
2. The angled rear sides to the bed are for the electric tonneau cover tracks and for air slip stream. Regular squared off pickup truck cabs/beds have tons of efficiency loss from the turbulence created there.
3. I currently have a 2016 RAM Power Wagon which I'll keep until my CyberTruck gets delivered. I guess the whole "regular pickup" drivers would never get this is out the window.
4. You all worry way too much about what other people think. Must live fragile lives.
5. How someone thinks something like this looks better than the CyberTruck is beyond me:
What kind of market share do you suppose they could of grabbed with a truck that was actually useful as a truck?
It’s amazing what simply eliminating some of the triangular body hiding the bed does to the visuals of the cybertruck.
View attachment 480078 View attachment 480079
I mean, I'm far from alone in this regard.
If most people agree that Jennifer Aniston is pretty, it's probably because she is. Just saying.