TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Toyota 'Mirai' Fuel Cell Sedan

Discussion in 'Electric Vehicles' started by ivog, Nov 19, 2014.

  1. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    10,212
    Location:
    Maine
    You probably missed it because people don't care much about HFCV any more. Eyes are on PEV.

    You can only downsize the fuell-cell stack so much and you can't downsize the hydrogen tanks. Maybe it gets there. But if it'd work on cost, it implies cheap batteries. And cheap batteries implies BEV.

    Fun facts: Clarity FCV curb weight is 4,134lb, Mirai 4,075lb. Clarity PHEV curb weight is 4,052lb. Can't even point to a weight advantage over PHEVs and long-range BEVs at the moment.
     
  2. JohnSnowNW

    JohnSnowNW Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2015
    Messages:
    2,623
    Location:
    Minnesota
    You're missing the purification step after reforming, and distribution after (or before) compression. Unfortunately, reforming natural gas doesn't get you to the 99.99% purity required for use in an FCEV, and most H2 isn't produced at the stations themselves.

    The other issue with utilizing H2 is the high cost of maintaining the equipment, which is often ignored in conversations comparing H2 with electricity generation.
     
    • Informative x 1
  3. mspohr

    mspohr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    8,943
    Location:
    California
    Fuel cells are horribly inefficient
    DGN8sTWWsAAepeU.jpg
     
    • Informative x 6
    • Helpful x 1
  4. ggr

    ggr Expert in Dunning-Kruger Effect!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,967
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    ... but not zero emissions.
     
  5. JohnSnowNW

    JohnSnowNW Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2015
    Messages:
    2,623
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Shifting the emissions from the tailpipe doesn't really make it zero emissions. This argument has been used against BEVs, of course, but the difference is that BEVs have far more control over where their energy comes from, and they're considerably more efficient at using said energy. As it stands now 95% of H2 comes from NG, and that's not going to change anytime soon. California has mandated that 1/3 of H2 must come from RE sources, but the rest of the country/world has no such stipulation, and even the California mandate has a loophole that would allow a station operator to ignore it.

    Heck, Japan is now purchasing brown coal derived H2 from Australia. So, not only was it made from the absolute dirtiest form of coal, it is then put on one of the most polluting means of transportation for delivery.

    Victoria turns coal to hydrogen for Japan

    On the other hand, California's grid mix is 70% non-GGE, with electricity rates that are considerably cheaper than H2. And they don't even have close to the cleanest grid (but they do buy FAR more BEVs than anyone else (outside of China))

    FCEVs will never be cheap to run, the stations will never be cheap to operate, and we're simply delaying making real progress at tackling AGW by not outright rejecting the technology.

    I realize this may have come across as a bit preachy, but I'm over HFC nonsense.
     
    • Like x 5
  6. DanCar

    DanCar Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,670
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Not seeing the big coverage:
    1. Eksplosjon på hydrogenstasjon i Sandvika: – Svært overrasket
    2. Hydrogen refueling station explodes in Norway; Toyota, Hyundai halt FCV sales - LeftLaneNews
     
    • Informative x 1
  7. mspohr

    mspohr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    8,943
    Location:
    California
    Fire sale on the Mirai
    Toyota Mirai gets deepest discount yet—amid hydrogen shortage
    The two modest fuel-cell models you can currently purchase (versus lease) both carry luxury-vehicle prices: a base $59,430 for the 2019 Toyota Mirai and a base $59,345 for the eco-focused Hyundai Nexo Blue. Trade-in or resale value remains an unknown. And at the last time we filled with hydrogen, last October, it cost $17.49 per kilogram—potentially up to a $75 fill for the 312-mile Mirai or a $110 fill for the 380-mile Nexo B

    CarsDirect crunched the numbers and found that for the savings (for a narrow subset of shoppers, admittedly) could add up to more than $42,000.
     
    • Informative x 1
  8. ralph142

    ralph142 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2019
    Messages:
    350
    Location:
    bellingham, wa
    $.24 a mile is saving ? compared to what ? tesla model 3, $ .023 a mile here. honda accord, 30 mpg, $.13 a mile.
     
    • Like x 5
  9. RiverBrick

    RiverBrick Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Messages:
    2,503
    Location:
    Mount Washington Valley
    • Informative x 1
  10. CarlK

    CarlK Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    1,919
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
  11. BluestarE3

    BluestarE3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2016
    Messages:
    4,083
    Location:
    Norcal
  12. FlatSix911

    FlatSix911 Porsche 918 Hybrid

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2015
    Messages:
    6,473
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
  13. GoBlue88

    GoBlue88 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    845
    Location:
    Carlsbad, CA
    The end of fuel cell vehicles was so predictable. And I still laugh every time I see a Mirai on the road, which is surprisingly often around here.

    Toyota's attitude re: fuel cells vs. BEVs has been so, so dumb.
     
  14. Ed Hart

    Ed Hart Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2014
    Messages:
    287
    Location:
    Yorba Linda, CA
    A watershed moment next year?

    Hydrogen and Japan.jpg
     
    • Informative x 2
    • Funny x 1
  15. CarlK

    CarlK Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    1,919
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    #615 CarlK, Jun 16, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2019
    Wow...that's a real deep hole to get out. Japanese are the most stubborn and insistent people in the world. More so than even the Germans. That sometimes enabled them to reach outcomes otherwise wouldn't be possible but other times it has just the opposite effect. It's definitely the later in this case.
     
    • Helpful x 1
    • Informative x 1
    • Funny x 1
  16. GoBlue88

    GoBlue88 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    845
    Location:
    Carlsbad, CA
    Having a hydrogen pipeline completely surrounding and weaving through the athlete's village seems like a really bad idea.
     
  17. renim

    renim Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    1,794
    Location:
    Oz
    on an energy delivery basis, its probably similar to a natural gas pipe, more explosive but quicker dissipating. Just requires understanding of the differences and design accordingly.
     
  18. renim

    renim Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    1,794
    Location:
    Oz
    There is a direct thermal way to obtain hydrogen, which must be attractive for the Japanese. (can add to nuclear plant)
    upload_2019-6-18_9-20-59.png

    long term, its only a single boost step up for a geothermal deposit output to go from 250 Celsius to 500 Celsius. Effectively this is also a planetary wide option for many nations, just drill with skill
     
  19. mspohr

    mspohr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    8,943
    Location:
    California
    Di
    Direct thermal plus electricity.
    Simple, except it's not.
    Efficiency?
     
    • Helpful x 1
  20. mblakele

    mblakele beep! beep!

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2016
    Messages:
    1,666
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Copper–chlorine cycle - Wikipedia

    Seems to be big with the nuclear crowd, who are looking for ways to ensure their future. Drawbacks seems to include:
    • working fluids are corrosive, which may increase long-term costs
    • high energy requirements: a 2005 study predicts ~30% efficiency; a 2011 study predicts 45%
    • unproven technology: many studies, simulations, even lab-scale reactors — but I couldn't find a pilot plant
    If it works out, which sounds like it's probably 10 years out, you'd have a decent source of hydrogen that doesn't depend on fossil fuels. However there's still very little infrastructure out there to store and distribute hydrogen, and it's challenging stuff to work with.

    So if and when this Cu-Cl cycle works out, I'd favor setting it up close to an industrial source of CO2, maybe a cement plant. Use that CO2 to turn H2 into CH4 (which generates some waste heat to feed back into the Cu-Cl cycle), then store the CH4 in any nearby natural gas storage field — we have lots of those. Whenever the sun isn't shining, we can burn this green CH4 in an efficient combined-cycle turbine, generating electricity and feeding CO2 back into the cycle.

    I definitely wouldn't fuel a car with H2. That's what batteries are for.
     
    • Like x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC