You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that GoPro is adding a bit of drag preventing 125 mph trap speed.
Wtf, next time take off your shoes and shirt and hit 10.3 apparently. You see where this is going. All-nude 9 second car incoming.
Wtf, next time take off your shoes and shirt and hit 10.3 apparently. You see where this is going. All-nude 9 second car incoming.
Yeah if he ditched the GoPro and floor mats and skipped a meal or two he might hit 10.39
That's crazy, just removing the frunk trim. Isn't it just some plastic, foam, and carpet? What's next passenger seat, trunk trim and rear seats?
I'm quire certain he has removed a lot more than the frunk liner. 30lbs isn't going to amount to a hill of beans on a 15 second car, to say nothing about a 10 second run.
Right. No way 30 lbs makes any difference at all on a 5000 pound car. Were the rear seats shown in the video? Maybe he removed those.
I agree but I suspect that this was a different track with better preparation. One track that I go to rarely (too far away) is 0.1 sec faster than my usual one.I've read all of the comments following the YouTube video.
He makes no mention of, nor does he alludes to, any other weight reduction aside from the frunk removal for the purposes of this 10.44 pass.
He does however state that further weight reduction efforts aside from the current frunk removal may be utilized in future runs.
Since the only claim he has made regarding weight reduction is the frunk removal, and his videos over these last several months appear to be on the up and up, I am inclined to believe that his improvement to this point , i.e. achieving 10.44 over his prior bests in this low options version of the car, is related to his frunk removal and no other weight reduction efforts thus far.