OK. It was bandied about quite a bit on the Tesla.com forums as being a thing, but I have no personal experience so I'm claiming ignorance and withdrawing my comment.
I hear that thing said sometimes, and I'm not going to bother trying to argue it a lot unless it's important or relevant (like this thread). It's usually this frivolous debate about whether to keep it plugged in all the time in someone's garage, and people go on these spiels about how the car is "optimizing" and doing tons of various "battery management" and "temperature conditioning", and I swear the way people talk about it, they are saying it's running heating and air conditioning just for the battery's sake to keep it in a narrow 5 degree window. Granted, there are some extra things the car will do if it DOES have that external energy source available, but that's different. If the batteries are sitting while the car is off, it lets it go to a pretty wide temperature range.
But the batteries can very safely sit near freezing point or a bit under with low output, and it's not harmful. Of course it has noticeable effects people don't like, which I think is why people seem so obsessed with thinking they need to be warmed all the time:
1. Energy capacity locked out--the cold temp makes for very inefficient and slow reactions, so there just isn't as much total energy available (snowflake and blue bar on the battery meter)
2. Also reduced power input/output
3. Massively high power usage for quite a while when you first start driving while it runs a lot of heating now that the car IS being used.
So that's going to be OK with the battery as long as people are OK with realizing it's going to have huge energy consumption and terrible looking efficiency afterward.