I have worked in a large manufacturing facility where we had all the machines brought in from Germany. Ok, it was not automobile manufacturing, but still, high-tech precision, high speed manufacturing. Huge production floor about the size of 22 football fields, many dozens of large machines. All German built. Shipped from Germany and re-assembled and setup right on our production floor.
We had German engineers on site for months helping us get the machines ready for high speed production. The last German engineer probably left after a year. It can take a LONG time to properly setup, calibrate, test, test again, validate, debug, troubleshoot, etc... these complex machines. Test production runs, fix, repeat, etc...you get the picture.
Even if today they can do it faster/better, it could still take a month or two (minimum) to get the line up to full operating speed, probably longer. I would safely estimate 3-4 months at least, probably.
Anyone who says 3-4 weeks is probably on the very high-end of "optimistic"![]()
DieselGate or whatever flashy name it goes by in the news, as well as the monkey gas chamber testing really should have an impact on the average consumer's conscience. The fact that it doesn't, based on the lack of public outcry, shows how distanced IMHO we have become regarding corporations and our health/safety.
@DragonWatch Cannon Cocker/String Puller duly noted.![]()
Judging by the descriptions of the semi-automatic lines on the conference call, I think 2500/week could be reached in June *without* the new automated lines...If the German automation line were done, it would already be shipping to the GF. I agree on June at earliest for actual deployment and reaching 2500/week.
Judging by the descriptions of the semi-automatic lines on the conference call, I think 2500/week could be reached in June *without* the new automated lines...
I assume that those complaining are generally people who want a minimally priced Model 3 and currently own a car that is getting old and developing problems. Of course some of those expressing frustration may actually be short sellers pretending to be reservation holders. The Model 3 that unhappy folks want would be the version with minimal profit margin for the company. Shareholders should be pleased that versions with higher profit margins are getting priority. That has long been Tesla's general procedure, which makes sense and should not be surprising.
Meanwhile, complaints are not being heard from the horde of Model 3 reservation holders like me who are more than willing to wait. My current car has only been driven for 25,000 miles and is free of problems. I am happy that others are essentially serving as Model 3 beta testers. A longer wait means any necessary corrections will be made and advanced improvements will likely be added before my Model 3 is delivered.
I suspect that most of those unhappy with the delay will eventually buy a Tesla car, even if they temporarily buy something else to replace their current car. Indeed it may be wise for those folks to maintain their Model 3 reservations, and the large majority of them may do so despite frustration being expressed today.
Down macro day is worst day to second-guess Tesla woes. Let the dust settle a bit on the macros.
With that said, best might be to still close weeklies, and calls till June, July
Yeah, I'm in Toronto here and saw the same this morning in My Tesla page. Unfortunately, I would almost prefer for it to be delayed till Early 2019, as I have probably lost the equivalent of 3 Model 3's in the stock market the last 6 months. Not sure if I can close a new car in the middle of this year financially speakingJust a comment regarding the delivery estimates. I’m from Toronto and my estimate actually was pulled in. Originally it was late 2018. Now it says mid 2018. With the slower production ramp, perhaps they are now evaluating delivery options to maximize the US EV credit and not hit the 200k units in the US. Sucks for those in the US, but I’m ecstatic that there’s a remote chance of getting mine in <6 months!!
![]()
If they can do 2500/week with the current line, why are they not doing it?Judging by the descriptions of the semi-automatic lines on the conference call, I think 2500/week could be reached in June *without* the new automated lines...
We're not talking about a line. By what Tesla says, they have three original automated lines, which suck, and then they have added a lot of semi-automatic workstations. The semi-automatic assembly accounts for over half of the current production (if I interpret their statements correctly). Tesla says they can scale the semi-automatic assembly rapidly, and they probably are adding capacity. Scaling this up will take *some* time, but it would certainly become a top priority if the Grohmann lines don't work as expected.If they can do 2500/week with the current line, why are they not doing it?