Aaaargh, no one gives a rat's ass about "considering". For the nth time, it's all about the expression "funding secured".
Umm because why. These are one statement not two. One doesn't need funding committed to consider something.
Duh.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aaaargh, no one gives a rat's ass about "considering". For the nth time, it's all about the expression "funding secured".
Couldn't the SEC have gotten some more legal advice, or at least wait until the quarter was over, before filing a borderline frivolous lawsuit? The timing was entirely their decision and Elon could not have known that they'd rush to file the lawsuit almost immediately.
Usually the SEC is discouraging market manipulation - this time they actively engaged in it.
Yesterday's closing price was $307.52, so the 10% drop uptick rule activates at around $276.76.
The price is currently slightly below that level, so it could be triggered right on the opening tick. Once triggered it remains active for today and for all of Monday.
The uptick rule prohibits market participants (traders, funds) with a short position to use pressure sales to mark down the price: market sell orders and stop sell orders of any kind, and limit orders below the "national best bid".
They can only use what regular bearish stock holders selling stock generally do: limit orders above the best bid, and of course they can buy as well.
That might be believable, but I don't think so, because SEC investigations come and go. It's possible that the news of an SEC investigation wouldn't come out until it was already closed.Be careful, my friend, as there may be some institutions that have in their by laws that they can not hold stock when a company or it's CEO is under SEC investigation.......I am not a lawyer or a member of the SEC but maybe just back up half a truck tomorrow.
Imagine what would happen if Tesla released good Q3 results. Then imagine what would happen after that if SEC then sued.Couldn't the SEC have gotten some more legal advice, or at least wait until the quarter was over, before filing a borderline frivolous lawsuit? The timing was entirely their decision and Elon could not have known that they'd rush to file the lawsuit almost immediately.
Usually the SEC is discouraging market manipulation - this time they actively engaged in it.
NYT:
"[...]
The S.E.C. approached the Tesla chief with an offer to settle the case, according to a person familiar with his thinking, but he refused to negotiate, adamant that he had done nothing wrong. A person briefed on the talks said they fell apart Thursday morning, setting the stage for the S.E.C. to vote on the action."
Not a surprise.
Do you mean the stock price was about to rise due to Q3Q4 and other Model 3 successes? It wasn't rising very quickly when he made the tweet.
CTO isn't the right position for him I suspect, and it'd be a position he couldn't hold anyway if the SEC gets their way.When trading has stopped today and we are below $250, we'll see a statement about Elon remaining as CTO/head of design and resigning as CEO.
Will admit am distressed by all this. The timing sucks.
When trading has stopped today and we are below $250, we'll see a statement about Elon remaining as CTO/head of design and resigning as CEO.
I think that legal argument is tenuous, but even under that standard it could have been considered equally reckless to allow rampant trading on the Saudi news, locking out most investors of that information, while Elon was in full knowledge of the true intent of the Saudis: they already bought a significant stake in Tesla, they supported taking Tesla private, and wanted a Gigafactory built in Saudi Arabia.
SCOTUS in Basic vs Levinson said:In these early stages of the discussions between Combustion and Basic, Basic had no duty to speak, but once it spoke, it assumed the legal duty to be truthful.
The lawyers are going to hash it out what level of agreement counts as 'secured' under those circumstances, but generally even verbal agreements count as such in California. If the agreement by the leader of the Saudi investment fund, who manages 250 billion dollars in assets which they want to grow by 100 billion dollars per year, who just told you that they bought 5% of Tesla, and supported the notion of taking Tesla private (with conditions) isn't funding secured, then I don't know what is.
The timing of this news coming out exactly with 1 trading day left right before the week where Tesla's final proof of profitability is most probable - well that is very, very suspicious.
Now we know, why taking private would have been better for the future of humanity, but maybe not for our money (tiny private investors)
and maybe Elon should take Tesla private anytime he can and don't look back again.
Don't think twice: IF they bring Tesla down and there is no good selling long-range EV over some years, the big automakers can (and will) proclaim anytime, that is wasn't proftable, wasn't working, wasn't clean, wasn't whatever and stop their EV developments anytime!
We are not there, not quite!
Fingers crossed for our sustainable future.
TODAY it is NOW or NEVER friends!
My biggest concern is. Let’s say this quarter is great. They need to keep ramping up. How long can employees keep up this marathon. And they will probably still have QC issues while they do ramp up. It’s hard to QC stuff when the procedures keep changing to make things faster.
save itWhat the heck? I went to bed with dreams of buying in the $250s today and I wake up and the pre-market is $275? Come on, people! Clearly Tesla is DOOOOOOOMED! Sell sell sell!!! Short short short!!!
Ugh.... I never get to spend this powder....