brian45011
Active Member
Maybe check out the substance and get some more perspective on when the $35k version will be available?Oh look, it's another article with a question as a title. So the answer is probably no.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe check out the substance and get some more perspective on when the $35k version will be available?Oh look, it's another article with a question as a title. So the answer is probably no.
Maybe check out the substance and get some more perspective on when the $35k version will be available?
I don't need to. I'm clever. I follow Elon on Twitter. What new information will this article present to me? Exactly, none... Did anything in Elon's Tweet suggest that they had 'abandoned' the mass market? There is a difference between making a clever financial decision by DELAYING a product vs. abandoning it completely.
I think this tweet is important. It validates the shorts' long-held belief that Tesla cannot build the cheaper version at a profit, although I acknowledge that Musk indicates that he's hoping to change this. When you combine it with the various news in the conversion rate over the last couple of weeks, there is considerable additional support for the theorem that "if they price it high enough to make a profit, it won't sell, and if they price it low enough to sell, it won't make a profit.""Over the weekend, Chief Executive Elon Musk announced a new, $78,000 version of Tesla's car for the people, the Model 3. More important was his admission that his promised $35,000 version would cause the company to "lose money and die" if built right away."
Is Tesla Abandoning the Mass Market?
MARKETWATCH 11:18 AM ET 5/21/2018
I think this tweet is important. It validates the shorts' long-held belief that Tesla cannot build the cheaper version at a profit, although I acknowledge that Musk indicates that he's hoping to change this. When you combine it with the various news in the conversion rate over the last couple of weeks, there is considerable additional support for the theorem that "if they price it high enough to make a profit, it won't sell, and if they price it low enough to sell, it won't make a profit."
I think this tweet is important. It validates the shorts' long-held belief that Tesla cannot build the cheaper version at a profit, although I acknowledge that Musk indicates that he's hoping to change this. When you combine it with the various news in the conversion rate over the last couple of weeks, there is considerable additional support for the theorem that "if they price it high enough to make a profit, it won't sell, and if they price it low enough to sell, it won't make a profit."
I think this tweet is important. It validates the shorts' long-held belief that Tesla cannot build the cheaper version at a profit, although I acknowledge that Musk indicates that he's hoping to change this. When you combine it with the various news in the conversion rate over the last couple of weeks, there is considerable additional support for the theorem that "if they price it high enough to make a profit, it won't sell, and if they price it low enough to sell, it won't make a profit."
As I understand it, the "won't make a profit" is only valid during the production ramp, once this is achieved the lower-price car become profitable.
And of course, Tesla are just continuing the strategy they've always followed - higher-priced cars to subsidise the cheaper one to come.
I think this tweet is important.
The problem is that fixed costs come back to bite you, notably when you have to cover the debt you incurred in paying them. That, I suspect, is why Musk said Tesla would "die" if it made the cheaper version now.It would just take longer to become profitable if they instead started with building the low end version first. Margins are lower so it would take more sold cars to offset the costs for production equipment. I think most of the misunderstandings from the shorts boil down to not understanding fixed and variable costs.
The problem is that fixed costs come back to bite you, notably when you have to cover the debt you incurred in paying them. That, I suspect, is why Musk said Tesla would "die" if it made the cheaper version now.
I guess this isn't helping the SP right now - perfect timing, strange...
Tesla Model 3 Falls Short of a CR Recommendation
MotorTrends is just addicted to all the ads Tesla buy on their properties /sI find this very curious by Consumer Reports.
Tesla reports 133 ft stopping distance with base tires, 126 with upgrades. Motor Trend was able to achieve 119 ft. Now Consumer Reports says it took them 152 ft to stop. One of these things is not like the others...
CR said it hit Tesla's spec of 133 ft on the first try in two different vehicles. Subsequent tests on both vehicles showed significantly worse results. The 152 was the average.I find this very curious by Consumer Reports.
Tesla reports 133 ft stopping distance with base tires, 126 with upgrades. Motor Trend was able to achieve 119 ft. Now Consumer Reports says it took them 152 ft to stop. One of these things is not like the others...
He said it because making 3500 cars a week for 40,000 will kill them. Making 6000 cars a week with 2000 at 40,000 and 2000 at 50,000 and 2000 at 65000 will be a profitable mix. By that time overhead as a percent of costs will be 40% of today, overtime will be reduced per vehicle. If they are at 7000 in q4 they probably open SR configuration. I’m torn, I like VA’a 10,000 estimate, but it really depends on uptake at the high end and new order volume. Each new car seems to beget 2 new orders, so it may take a long time to catch up.The problem is that fixed costs come back to bite you, notably when you have to cover the debt you incurred in paying them. That, I suspect, is why Musk said Tesla would "die" if it made the cheaper version now.
I think this tweet is important. It validates the shorts' long-held belief that Tesla cannot build the cheaper version at a profit, although I acknowledge that Musk indicates that he's hoping to change this. When you combine it with the various news in the conversion rate over the last couple of weeks, there is considerable additional support for the theorem that "if they price it high enough to make a profit, it won't sell, and if they price it low enough to sell, it won't make a profit."
It would just take longer to become profitable if they instead started with building the low end version first. Margins are lower so it would take more sold cars to offset the costs for production equipment. I think most of the misunderstandings from the shorts boil down to not understanding fixed and variable costs.
Answer:OK. So when--what month and year-- in NA? In EU? In Asia (LHD)? In Asia (RHD)?