I respectfully disagree with some of WarpedOne's answers. You should take into account typical speeds, terrain, weather and specific distances between successive superchargers before you pay the additional time penalty (and degradation penalty, if any) of slowly creeping from 90% to 100% SoC.
Given the following:
Gilroy - 111 miles (hilly pass and then flat terrain) - Harris Ranch - 110 miles (all flat) - Tejon Ranch - 91 miles (Grapevine with massive consumption for the climb but great regen on the way down) - Hawthorne
I was very conservative going out with 100%, 90%, 95% on my way out but, on the way back, starting at 80-odd % at each place was plenty for my S60 to make those jumps. And, while I clocked a conservative 295 Wh/mile from Tejon to Haw the first time and arrived with 80 miles to spare, I drove like a madman back through the Grapevine clocking 420 Wh/mile with 35 miles to spare. Did good time at 80+ mph on the flat sections too and a 50-mile cushion of the rated range over the driving distance was plenty every time.
As Cottonwood and others have suggested, driving as quickly as you can, to get to the next supercharger with as low an SoC as you can be comfy with optimizes both the travel time and the charging time (with the ramp up at lower SoCs) at the next stop.
Have to add that this was all with Calif.'s mild weather, of course. In colder climes, things have to be more conservative, I suppose.