Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make. Please see this thread for more details and to find out how to revert to the old design. Cheers!

DaveG_NJ

Member
Oct 7, 2020
435
1,255
NJ
In October 2020 Elon claimed FSD will be finished by end of 2020, and he'll have a fleet of robo-taxis on the road by the end of 2020 (so 2-3 months later).
This, plus the exhortation that it was SO close! And a public beta was going out! And the price was going up from $8K to $10 in a week! Get it before it's too late!

I fell for it. Easily the worst financial decision/purchase of my life. Now at least buyers have a year of public beta experience - empirical evidence that it's only gotten incrementally better, but still not ready. And they can try it for $199/mon if they want to dip their toe in the water. I would be shocked to learn that the take rate at $10K is >0% now, but suckers are born every day.
 

Sporty

Member
Apr 20, 2019
200
152
Seattle
This, plus the exhortation that it was SO close! And a public beta was going out! And the price was going up from $8K to $10 in a week! Get it before it's too late!

I fell for it. Easily the worst financial decision/purchase of my life. Now at least buyers have a year of public beta experience - empirical evidence that it's only gotten incrementally better, but still not ready. And they can try it for $199/mon if they want to dip their toe in the water. I would be shocked to learn that the take rate at $10K is >0% now, but suckers are born every day.

The result is hard to call incrementally better. I like the stop light ‘ding’ and a bunch of stuff did get smoother, but it now slams on the breaks for no reason in light to no traffic cases making any real use of it unusable. And it’s been that way for a long time now. Since fsd-beta started there’s been no real updates to the feature anymore.
 

whitex

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2015
6,792
8,629
Seattle area, WA
So it kinda made sense with AP2.0's capabilities and setup, that it should be able to. It can already see more than a human can, at all angles at all times, so why couldn't it? Look at how much processing power it has! It has all the inputs, why couldn't it?
Well, for one it had no redundancies in computing or actuation. Any half competent engineer would point out that cannot possibly be safe to use. Sure, humans can drive with only 2 cameras, 2 microphones, a crude accelerometer, and limited redundancy, but that took millions of years of evolution.

You know, back in 2012 I was pretty sure, given the building blocks, that a legitimate electric fighter jet wouldn't be too far off. I really still do want to see an electric F-16. 😂
How many of those electric F-16's did you sell though (i.e. took people's money)? I think you are confusing being a visionary and a dreamer with conning people out of money by selling them something you know will never materialize on the product you sold. Elon selling a car as full self driving capable is similar to Intel selling you a baggy of silicon sand for $1,000 telling you it is capable of being an ultra high end processor which will beat all the processors on the market today. Just like in Elon's example, Intel is in fact working on the next gen processor, and just like in Elon's example, they will release more and more capable products, except just like in Elon's example, your baggy of silicon is never going to be that product.
 

FalconFour

Member
Supporting Member
Mar 25, 2016
350
692
San Jose, CA
I don't feel like we're going to find common ground on this, but let's just say, we share very different perceptions of the world. Elon didn't sell a bag of silicon sand saying it could be a processor (though it literally never could, without me having a fab house of my own). He sold a computer that could, in theory, be capable of self-driving once the software was developed - which could be delivered over-the-air (as has been demonstrated). In other words, no expectation of me doing anything except waiting. And maybe helping test and improve what does come along.

I'm an optimist, you're a pessimist on this... for me, that means I expect it to be here soon and will be mildly disappointed by the delays along the way; for you that means you're mildly disappointed that people are "falling for it" but would be surprised when it does get here, I guess.
 

whitex

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2015
6,792
8,629
Seattle area, WA
I don't feel like we're going to find common ground on this, but let's just say, we share very different perceptions of the world. Elon didn't sell a bag of silicon sand saying it could be a processor (though it literally never could, without me having a fab house of my own). He sold a computer that could, in theory, be capable of self-driving once the software was developed - which could be delivered over-the-air (as has been demonstrated). In other words, no expectation of me doing anything except waiting. And maybe helping test and improve what does come along.

I'm an optimist, you're a pessimist on this... for me, that means I expect it to be here soon and will be mildly disappointed by the delays along the way; for you that means you're mildly disappointed that people are "falling for it" but would be surprised when it does get here, I guess.
So, just so that I am clear on your position as an optimist, do you honestly believe that people who purchased FSD with AP2.0 in 2016 will one day get an over-the-air update which will allow them to summon their car from New York to Los Angeles, and drive the owners as they sleep on the back seat, as promised by Elon at the time? If, yes, we definitely have to agree to disagree. Also, follow up question - do you think Full Self Driving as sold in 2016 will happen before the cars on which it was sold in 2016 will reach their end of life?
 

FalconFour

Member
Supporting Member
Mar 25, 2016
350
692
San Jose, CA
So, just so that I am clear on your position as an optimist, do you honestly believe that people who purchased FSD with AP2.0 in 2016 will one day get an over-the-air update which will allow them to summon their car from New York to Los Angeles, and drive the owners as they sleep on the back seat, as promised by Elon at the time? If, yes, we definitely have to agree to disagree. Also, follow up question - do you think Full Self Driving as sold in 2016 will happen before the cars on which it was sold in 2016 will reach their end of life?
That was not in the sales pitch; that was Elon's Twitter. Jesus, you're moving the goalposts to the surface of the moon and expecting a legitimate, not hostile response?

YES. I EXPECT WHAT THEY WERE SOLD. They were not sold "summon their car from LA to New York", no matter what Tweets you dig up. Twitter is not the sales page for FSD.

Because that person with AP2.0 can, as promised, get their car fitted with HW3 for free and, if they want (and they will), MCU2 (for an extra cost) as well.

I friggin' hate trying to reason with chronic pessimists that fight, claw, scratch, and scream to be right in how much they hate/disbelieve/want to dunk on something.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: am_dmd

whitex

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2015
6,792
8,629
Seattle area, WA
That was not in the sales pitch; that was Elon's Twitter. Jesus, you're moving the goalposts to the surface of the moon and expecting a legitimate, not hostile response?

YES. I EXPECT WHAT THEY WERE SOLD. They were not sold "summon their car from LA to New York", no matter what Tweets you dig up. Twitter is not the sales page for FSD.

Because that person with AP2.0 can, as promised, get their car fitted with HW3 for free and, if they want (and they will), MCU2 (for an extra cost) as well.

I friggin' hate trying to reason with chronic pessimists that fight, claw, scratch, and scream to be right in how much they hate/disbelieve/want to dunk on something.
Ok, let's assume Elon's twitter is complete BS hype and anyone who buys Tesla based on those purchases deserves what they get (or don't get). Do you think Tesla will deliver what was in the Design Studio (the page where you order your car) shown below, at no extra cost to the end user, before the car's 10th birthday? Let's assume retrofits are allowed (in my Intel analogy it would be equivalent to exchanging the baggy of sand for a chip at no cost).
1633333287866.png

If you truly believe all of the above will be delivered, are you a betting person?
 

Dan D.

Member
Dec 7, 2020
855
1,061
Vancouver, BC
That was not in the sales pitch; that was Elon's Twitter. Jesus, you're moving the goalposts to the surface of the moon and expecting a legitimate, not hostile response?

YES. I EXPECT WHAT THEY WERE SOLD. They were not sold "summon their car from LA to New York", no matter what Tweets you dig up. Twitter is not the sales page for FSD.

Because that person with AP2.0 can, as promised, get their car fitted with HW3 for free and, if they want (and they will), MCU2 (for an extra cost) as well.

I friggin' hate trying to reason with chronic pessimists that fight, claw, scratch, and scream to be right in how much they hate/disbelieve/want to dunk on something.
The lofty expectations about Summon are also on Tesla's blog: https://www.tesla.com/en_CA/blog/summon-your-tesla-your-phone

That blog links to a page that lets you schedule a Test Drive. Certainly seems like a sales pitch to me. The key word I highlighted for Summon going and getting you, is "Eventually". Gives no time promise, but does suggest it is the plan.

January 10, 2016
Schedule Test Drive Experience Autopilot today
Last Fall, Tesla Version 7.0 software introduced a range of new Autopilot active safety and convenience features to give you more confidence behind the wheel, increase your safety on the road, and make highway driving more enjoyable. The release of Tesla Version 7.1 software continues our improvements to self-driving technology. This release expands Autopilot functionality and introduces the first iteration of Summon.

Using Summon, once you arrive home and exit Model S or Model X, you can prompt it to do the rest: open your garage door, enter your garage, park itself, and shut down. In the morning, you wake up, walk out the front door, and summon your car. It will open the garage door and come to greet you. More broadly, Summon also eliminates the burden of having to squeeze in and out of tight parking spots. During this Beta stage of Summon, we would like customers to become familiar with it on private property. Eventually, your Tesla will be able to drive anywhere across the country to meet you, charging itself along the way. It will sync with your calendar to know exactly when to arrive.
 

FalconFour

Member
Supporting Member
Mar 25, 2016
350
692
San Jose, CA
Yeah, Summon has definitely been a crock of 💩. The only damages I've ever had to my car were from Summon malfunctioning unexpectedly, and it not responding to releasing the button in time. So, yeah that's a bit of sour grapes. Just spent another $3500 getting the driver's side of my car all fixed up from the different scratches and gouges Summon gave me. Dumb Summon should be available to everyone and just go in a straight line - whenever it makes a steering change, it's a bad decision (with sometimes car-scraping consequences). Smart Summon, well, ... if the app connected reliably, it'd be somewhat useful at least.

That screenshot of an early FSD checkbox is an awful, uh... awful friggin' lofty set of promises, though, truly bordering on the misleading. At that time, they had _NONE_ of this stuff written - let alone simply waiting for regulatory approval. So that's definitely sketchy by my watch too. AP1 was Mobileye, right? Yeesh, they weren't even rolling their own yet. Maybe we can even point the finger at Mobileye for selling Tesla a bucket of promises... I remember the break-up wasn't exactly a kind one.

But for the majority of these features' existence (since, what, 2017-2021 now?), those promises were dialed back down to reality. I bought it under the assumption that it was selling future promises, and the ability to be there as they're created. That's what I bought into, and that's why I want FSD beta so bad my blood itches. I have always wanted to have the crappy half-baked product, and be there to watch it develop. I think a lot of people did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Microterf

whitex

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2015
6,792
8,629
Seattle area, WA
That screenshot of an early FSD checkbox is an awful, uh... awful friggin' lofty set of promises, though, truly bordering on the misleading. At that time, they had _NONE_ of this stuff written - let alone simply waiting for regulatory approval. So that's definitely sketchy by my watch too. AP1 was Mobileye, right? Yeesh, they weren't even rolling their own yet. Maybe we can even point the finger at Mobileye for selling Tesla a bucket of promises... I remember the break-up wasn't exactly a kind one.
Actually, Full Self Driving was only advertised after Tesla breakup with MobileEye, so not based on MobileEye promises of any kind. FSD was all pure Elon pipedream here, and the screen shot came from the order page (not Elon's Twitter) from when I ordered one of my cars in Dec 2016.

But for the majority of these features' existence (since, what, 2017-2021 now?), those promises were dialed back down to reality. I bought it under the assumption that it was selling future promises, and the ability to be there as they're created. That's what I bought into, and that's why I want FSD beta so bad my blood itches. I have always wanted to have the crappy half-baked product, and be there to watch it develop. I think a lot of people did.
I don't know when you bought FSD, but the FSD promises didn't get brought back to reality until mid 2019 IIRC, by moving a bunch of features from EAP to FSD and removing actual full self driving capabilities from FSD. Tesla FSD suddenly went from 0% to 80% complete as far as listed features, without writing a single line of code - genius, eh? Then Tesla removed any mention of the old FSD features from their website, just like they removed the information whether or not your free supercharging is transferable - I'm sure they are just hoping customers forget what they paid for.
 

Microterf

Member
Sep 18, 2020
395
626
Ohio
Yeah, Summon has definitely been a crock of 💩. The only damages I've ever had to my car were from Summon malfunctioning unexpectedly, and it not responding to releasing the button in time. So, yeah that's a bit of sour grapes. Just spent another $3500 getting the driver's side of my car all fixed up from the different scratches and gouges Summon gave me. Dumb Summon should be available to everyone and just go in a straight line - whenever it makes a steering change, it's a bad decision (with sometimes car-scraping consequences). Smart Summon, well, ... if the app connected reliably, it'd be somewhat useful at least.

That screenshot of an early FSD checkbox is an awful, uh... awful friggin' lofty set of promises, though, truly bordering on the misleading. At that time, they had _NONE_ of this stuff written - let alone simply waiting for regulatory approval. So that's definitely sketchy by my watch too. AP1 was Mobileye, right? Yeesh, they weren't even rolling their own yet. Maybe we can even point the finger at Mobileye for selling Tesla a bucket of promises... I remember the break-up wasn't exactly a kind one.

But for the majority of these features' existence (since, what, 2017-2021 now?), those promises were dialed back down to reality. I bought it under the assumption that it was selling future promises, and the ability to be there as they're created. That's what I bought into, and that's why I want FSD beta so bad my blood itches. I have always wanted to have the crappy half-baked product, and be there to watch it develop. I think a lot of people did.
I'm in the same boat. I bought FSD because I want to access the features as soon as humanly possible., I'll do submit to whatever requirements they have for users to gain access (camera monitoring, etc) and ensure that I'm paying attention. What is unacceptable is that they have this software out for almost a year now, with the initial goal to have it to everyone within 2 months.

The steps they are taking now are correct IMO, but given the track record, I have a hard time believing it will come to fruition as planned. I currently have a score of 100, with 582 Miles. Based on what Elon tweeted, if my score doesn't go down, I should have it on my car this time next week. I will be shocked if that turns out to be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pilotSteve

novox77

1.21 Gigawatts
Nov 25, 2017
2,237
4,783
NH, MA
Ok, let's assume Elon's twitter is complete BS hype and anyone who buys Tesla based on those purchases deserves what they get (or don't get). Do you think Tesla will deliver what was in the Design Studio (the page where you order your car) shown below, at no extra cost to the end user, before the car's 10th birthday? Let's assume retrofits are allowed (in my Intel analogy it would be equivalent to exchanging the baggy of sand for a chip at no cost).
View attachment 717666
If you truly believe all of the above will be delivered, are you a betting person?

It's great that people save the historical stuff. I wanted to break this down to see how much of this is done, ongoing, or scrapped in 2021.


This doubles the number of active cameras from four to eight
While the current production firmware isn't using 8 cameras, I'm pretty sure FSD beta is running on all 8 cameras.

, enabling full self-driving in
almost all circumstances, at what we believe will be a probability of safety at least twice as
good as the average human driver. The system is designed to be able to conduct short and
long distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat.
This is the core of FSD, and this is ongoing work to get it there. However, I think it needs to be more than 2x safer than a human before general acceptance. This will take both dev time, beta usage to generate statistics, and regulators using the data to make an informed decision. This is likely a few years out at minimum. My guess: 2 years to get FSD 10x safer than a human, an extra year of usage, and I can't predict what regulators will do. But this would get us to L4. L5 might require a longer march of 9s. But I personally would enjoy the system as L2. I think Tesla will release to the entire fleet while still L2 but at much better performance than today's FSD beta, naturally.

For Superchargers that have automatic charge connection enabled, you will not even
need to plug in your vehicle.
The "snake" connector seemed like an abandoned idea for a long while. Recently through a Musk tweek hinted it wasn't abandoned, just postponed. So I'll put this one as ongoing but low priority.

All you will need to do is get in and tell your car where to go. If you don't say anything, the car
will look at your calendar and take you there as the assumed destination or just home if
nothing is on the calendar.
This part describes the user experience of the UI and how it would work when FSD is mature. The implementation of the UI for FSD is trivial, and we'll likely see a lot of this during FSD beta testing.

Your Tesla will figure out the optimal route, navigate urban streets
(even without lane markings), manage complex intersections with traffic lights, stop signs and
roundabouts, and handle densely packed freeways with cars moving at high speed.
The is the core of FSD. We've seen videos of all of these things working (minus highways, but the code merge is imminent). And of course we've seen examples of interventions/disengagements for these things as well. Feature complete once single stack. Ongoing march of 9s.

When you
arrive at your destination, simply step out at the entrance and your car will enter park seek
mode, automatically search for a spot and park itself. A tap on your phone summons it back to
you.
This is aspirational smart summon and autopark functionality. It currently really really sucks on the old code stack. It seems clear to me that once we switch to the 4D vectorspace model, both of these features will work a LOT better. But they likely will be like everything else: need more ongoing march of 9s to refine.

Please note that Self-Driving functionality is dependent upon extensive software
validation and regulatory approval, which may vary widely by jurisdiction.
A good disclaimer, IMO. I actually think this should be at the top, in bold. Less excuse for customers/media/shorts saying they didn't notice it.

It is not
possible to know exactly when each element of the functionality described above will be
available, as this is highly dependent on local regulatory approval.
IMO this is the shadiest (Elon optimism) part of the whole description. Tesla should have put more emphasis on the "extensive software validation" from the preceding text than focus purely on regulatory approval. Both should have been called out again. This part reads like FSD is done and we're just waiting for lawmakers to acknowledge and act. Here's how I would have worded it:

"It is not possible to know exactly when each element of the functionality described above will be
available, as the functionality requires more development and testing to achieve desired safety levels that would earn regulatory approval for autonomous driving."

As written, I've put the emphasis on the dev and testing, rather than on the regulators. This should also go to the top and placed in bold.

Please note also that using
a self-driving Tesla for car sharing and ride hailing for friends and family is fine, but doing so
for revenue purposes will only be permissible on the Tesla Network, details of which will be
released next year.
This entire paragraph should have been eliminated, as it implies FSD is robotaxi-ready, which it isn't. While Tesla is definitely working toward this goal, it is way aspirational and also premature to be worrying about people generating revenue from their cars.

Longer term I think all of this will be achieved. It's a valid question whether the earlier FSD purchasers will experience something of a finished product. Many will have moved on to another car I suspect, and I think a lot of people will be justifiably upset that they paid for something that they never got. This might be somewhat acceptable to the really early adopters, as they might just chalk it up to supporting a good cause. But newer buyers will be less accepting of that.
 

whitex

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2015
6,792
8,629
Seattle area, WA
This is the core of FSD, and this is ongoing work to get it there. However, I think it needs to be more than 2x safer than a human before general acceptance. This will take both dev time, beta usage to generate statistics, and regulators using the data to make an informed decision. This is likely a few years out at minimum. My guess: 2 years to get FSD 10x safer than a human, an extra year of usage, and I can't predict what regulators will do. But this would get us to L4. L5 might require a longer march of 9s. But I personally would enjoy the system as L2. I think Tesla will release to the entire fleet while still L2 but at much better performance than today's FSD beta, naturally.
There have been L4/5 cars legally driving around in some jurisdictions already. Cruise and Waymo just got approval for commercialization (i.e. charging customers for the driverless rides) in Tesla's backyard (San Francisco) so obviously at least some regulators did approve some L4/5 cars, just not Tesla. I think Elon would have a better chance of being crowned Miss USA than current Tesla FSD passing as L4/5 in like Waymo or Cruise.

Please note that Self-Driving functionality is dependent upon extensive software
validation and regulatory approval, which may vary widely by jurisdiction.
A good disclaimer, IMO. I actually think this should be at the top, in bold. Less excuse for customers/media/shorts saying they didn't notice it.
Strong disagree. It's a misleading BS disclaimer which implies the software is ready or almost ready and only pending validation and regulatory approvals - remember that was 2016 - all they had then was a faked/edited FSD video they used for marketing. Automatic headlights and wipers didn't work on AP2.0 cars until almost a year later. Are you seriously going to tell me they had FSD done, just not validated, and it just took them a year to get regulatory approval for automatic headlights?

Longer term I think all of this will be achieved. It's a valid question whether the earlier FSD purchasers will experience something of a finished product. Many will have moved on to another car I suspect, and I think a lot of people will be justifiably upset that they paid for something that they never got. This might be somewhat acceptable to the really early adopters, as they might just chalk it up to supporting a good cause. But newer buyers will be less accepting of that.
No way Tesla will enable Level 4/5 FSD on all AP2.0 cars with FSD at no cost. Scam is what most would call it. No different than my 691hp P85D which Tesla claims has motors capable of that power but not the rest of the car, which came limited to 463hp by the battery. They might use the same excuse for FSD, the car is mostly capable, just not all of it, so you can't use it. Or they might use the disclaimer that says there is no firm deadline to just wait out the cars. In 100 years, if anyone still kept a 2016 Tesla in drivable condition, they can say they are still working on it and there is no ETA as per the disclaimer.

If Elon wanted donations to a cause, he should have been honest about it - donate x thousands to Tesla, and if Tesla gets to FSD before your car turns into dust, you will get a free over-the-air software update. That would have been an honest approach, instead of a scam he executed instead. By the way, there is a way Tesla could make it right, they could refund everyone who bought the car the full amount plug reasonable interest. I don't mean just FSD price, I mean the whole car, since many might have only bought the car because of FSD. If he really wanted to make a media splash, he could refund based on Tesla stock gain instead of just interest - after all, all those purchases helped Tesla get to where it is today. Now that would make headlines and make plenty of fanboys want to go buy whatever next vaporware he has to sell. $100K got 2500 shares back in 2016 when first FSD's were sold, today that's worth close to $2M - he could use it to prop up his other insane message that every Tesla is car an investment increasing in value as it ages! There would be people who will believe (heck, I remember arguing here with people who so believed every Tesla car with FSD will be worth over $200K no later than by end of 2020). :rolleyes:
 
unsurprising really. The owner profile has changed from early adopter, so less likely to throw 10k at something that probably won't be delivered in the lifetime of a three year lease.
If they still sold EAP I'm sure lots of folks would go for it.
Right now they are being asked to pay $10k to be delivered EAP in terms of what is delivered but much more expensive than EAP.
I have FSD on my car, I'll be replacing it soon and also getting one for my wife. I have no intention of spending $10 per car for something that is still in beta. Heck, even AP is still beta but at least that's included. FSD might be worth money when it doesn't have the beta tag on it, but not before.
Totally Agree. If they sold EAP for a reasonable price I would upgrade to that right away. $10k for FSD is just too steep
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJD

DaveG_NJ

Member
Oct 7, 2020
435
1,255
NJ
People have very strong feelings about this. I went from a skeptic to an owner/believer and then, coming out of the ether of being a new Tesla owner last October (and Elon's lofty promises), I'm back to being a skeptic again. I think FSD is a fascinating problem to attempt to solve, but ultimately, the program, even with the enormous strides made, will fail. I'm reminded of what someone said about the dogs who can bark the Jingle Bells song - "It's bloody awful and amazing at the same time."

Having used NoA extensively the past year, in the most congested state in the Union, I can see that human drivers and computer drivers cannot co-exist. If all cars were FSD equipped, sure. But humans are random, haphazard and often drive with emotion (their egos). FSD lacks the situational awareness , intelligence or the ability to analyze the context of a situation that raises the hair on the back of our necks - to see when a driver is going to cross multiple lanes, cut into a gap, pass on the right. It won't drop back when the car in front of you is aggressively tailgating the car in front of it. It can't see the traffic jam and brake lights a mile down the interstate. It can only react to what is immediately in front of it.

I think it would be reasonable to offer those of us who paid full price for FSD a pro-rated refund of the price we paid, minus the monthly fee for it during the time we used it. So I paid $8,000 (+ tax) and have used AP/NoA/Summon for 12 months. I would be happy with $8,000 minus $2,400 (12x$199). No harm, no foul. No interest. Not the full price. Fair is fair. Elon gave it his best shot, we went along for the ride, but give people who supported the effort a way out as the subscription people do.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: mark95476 and KJD

EVNow

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2009
11,734
32,414
Seattle, WA
Having used NoA extensively the past year, in the most congested state in the Union, I can see that human drivers and computer drivers cannot co-exist. If all cars were FSD equipped, sure. But humans are random, haphazard and often drive with emotion (their egos). FSD lacks the situational awareness , intelligence or the ability to analyze the context of a situation that raises the hair on the back of our necks - to see when a driver is going to cross multiple lanes, cut into a gap, pass on the right. It won't drop back when the car in front of you is aggressively tailgating the car in front of it. It can't see the traffic jam and brake lights a mile down the interstate. It can only react to what is immediately in front of it.
It can't do X now <> X can never be done.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: mark95476 and KJD

Zacster

Member
Sep 11, 2017
303
158
NYC
We have some ways to go before throwing in the towel I think.
You're not understanding then. It can be impossible to prove that it can be done. We can be infinitely chasing this. Just when you think you've got all the possibilities covered along comes a boulder rolling down the side of a mountain that the car avoids and then crashes into the oncoming train. Hmm, that sounds like a loonie tunes cartoon.
 

novox77

1.21 Gigawatts
Nov 25, 2017
2,237
4,783
NH, MA
You're not understanding then. It can be impossible to prove that it can be done. We can be infinitely chasing this. Just when you think you've got all the possibilities covered along comes a boulder rolling down the side of a mountain that the car avoids and then crashes into the oncoming train. Hmm, that sounds like a loonie tunes cartoon.

since it is unknowable if it's possible or not, I still prefer to try. technology does not improve by itself. We have to will it to improve. This is why legacy auto is still selling ICEV with very little incremental improvements for a century.

You're also looking at FSD as if it has an end state. It can very well never cover all edge cases. But it doesn't have to. It just needs to be better than the collective human-driving population. That to me doesn't sound hard to achieve at all. Let's see how much better it can be.
 

Products we're discussing on TMC...

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC