TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

UNOFFICIAL: Bluestar Pricing and Options

Discussion in 'Model 3' started by VolkerP, Jan 19, 2012.

Tags:
  1. vfx

    vfx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    14,790
    Location:
    CA CA
    But it's not about resolution it's finding and reaching out to touch the size of the current screen buttons. If my microwave had small buttons it would not get and better.

    - - - Updated - - -

    And the cost of making a dash with buttons is astronomical. Not like the 50's (or the Roadster!) when they use could order a "sliver knurled knob number 6 with a black hash mark' by the 10,000 for the dash. Now dashboards are sculpted shapes with button layout to fit contours and fit is a space space with a certain feel and task (on off, hold to scan, joystick, etc., With Tesla's screen all this is done. The Model S it's done The Model it's done. Any car beyond, it's all been done. And it's upgradable. Even after the car is delivered they are adding buttons with new features!! Freakin Awesome.
     
  2. ElSupreme

    ElSupreme Model S 03182

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    4,303
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Exactly I think using the 17" display in the Model S was probably about the same cost as making a 'button happy' dash. There is increased equipment cost, but the setup cost is much much less. With every Model after the S I think putting in a massive touch screen will be cheaper than developing a new dash.

    In 5 years I expect this to be the norm on ALL new cars, with some having it as soon as 3 years. 12" screen or bigger and a 70-90% less buttons. It takes that long for the automotive industry to move.
     
  3. spatterso911

    spatterso911 P100DL - Raven

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,223
    Location:
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA
    Tesla could easily cut the screen size in half, without changing the pixel size or resolution. A software button could swap screens, so that instead of having 2 half screens like the Model S (which can swap position), you'd have one, losing only the ability to have a giant full screen view of one screen. Totally doable. The iPad mini idea is very doable as well.
     
  4. gjunky

    gjunky Trifecta: Solar and both cars are EVs

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,247
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    I would keep the 17" screen and perhaps go OLED by that time. The screen makes such a statement and it will be nice to see it carried forward. Having two separate segments visible at the same time is a huge plus on the Model S. If they can make the mount strong enough it would be nice to have a way to tilt it towards the driver or passenger just a little.
    Also, Range Rover uses a screen that can display different content for the driver and the passenger at the same time. Not sure if they are touch screens but that would be awesome as the passenger could browse the internet on a trip and all the controls would still be visible and accessible to the driver. Again, not sure if this is possible with a touch screen and how it would determine control but then again this is Tesla :)
     
  5. vfx

    vfx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    14,790
    Location:
    CA CA
    +1 on OLED!
     
  6. Rodolfo Paiz

    Rodolfo Paiz Fidelius Family Office

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    788
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    I expect -- and hope -- that Tesla is being very accurate when they talk about competing with the BMW 3-series. Having a sedan, coupe, and convertible all built around the same chassis and drivetrain, offering four seats and a reasonable amount of space, for $30K to $60K (after tax credit) is BMW's bread and butter. Those cars sell like hotcakes... and I still miss my 335 convertible. :)

    The Gen-3 car MUST have a four-door (or five-door) option... that's the standard model to generate the most sales. Coupe and convertible alternatives will broaden the appeal of the platform to different buyers and create more potential customers while maintaining very high parts commonality. Having two -- or ideally three -- battery capacities available would make this car sell extremely well. Other things that would be very welcome IMHO are the Performance option, an AWD option with dual motors, and an AWD Performance option. Tires should likely be 15" with an option for 16"... but go with whatever the market wants as long as the Performance version can get some really good rubber to maintain best-in-class handling. All of those -- sedan, coupe, and convertible -- can be part of the same "Model C" or whatever they choose to call it. Easy to say you got a "C sedan" or a "C convertible".

    For my own personal car, I'd like the "C convertible" with four seats and good trunk space. I'd get the AWD Performance version, which hopefully would outrun the Model S by a little bit.

    As I noted recently on another thread, I would also create a supercar "Model R" based on the same small chassis. Make it also AWD with two motors from the Performance S, and you have 830 HP and an unholy 890 lb-ft of torque. Two-seat, drop-dead-gorgeous body that'll attract as much attention as the Roadster currently does (I've had Lamborghini drivers stop to stare... :cool:), use the largest battery available on that chassis as standard, and Tesla has a new flagship they can sell for $100K.

    With the Model S and Model X sharing one chassis, and the Model C and Model R sharing another, Tesla will have a very attractive and functional product line. Other vehicles are possible, but I'd sure start with those.
     
  7. Teslawisher

    Teslawisher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    322
    Location:
    Peoria, IL
    ZR-1 killer. ;)
     
  8. gjunky

    gjunky Trifecta: Solar and both cars are EVs

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,247
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    That is already a lot of variations but I would like to add a wagon to this. I know, not too popular here in the US but very practical when well done. I am thinking something like the Jetta Wagon or Audi A4 Avant which just made me think of an Audi Allroad type version with additional ground clearance :biggrin:
     
  9. marcon

    marcon Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2012
    Messages:
    31
    Location:
    Germany
    Thanks for the great work of collecting all those tidbits.

    That is true. It wouldn't be quite half the size, since you'd need the climate control and the menu bar at the top always visible. It would reduce the usability somewhat, but should be implemetable from the current software with little effort. It would still probably make sense only, if there was a very strong space constraint.

    Totally agree.

    That sounds like strong synergies. I think it will take some time to flesh out their portfolio, but I agree that a multitude of variations will be very beneficial for a global market. Wagons for example are very popular in Europe.

    That is massive torque from 0. (comparison: Bugatti Veyron Standard, 922 lbf·ft, and the 2012 Bugatti Veyron Vitesse, 1,100 lb·ft, @ 3,000-5,000 rpm).
     
  10. Hache

    Hache Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    76
    Indeed the panels each use about half of the screen, but the options popups and panels use almost full of the 17" screen. You still would have to update all of those options panels. So still a good piece of work. Keeping the 17" would be the cheapest options I think : less development, less compatibility issues.
    It would even reduce the cost of the Model S for Tesla, since they would buy the hardware (main screen, tegra 3, tegra 2, driving screen) about 220,000 each year (20,000 for Model S, 200,000 for Gen III).

    Makes sence to keep the same hardware as now, for me...
     
  11. Rodolfo Paiz

    Rodolfo Paiz Fidelius Family Office

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    788
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    I too believe that standardizing on the 17" screen is a better choice for Tesla than using a smaller screen on Gen-3. They will reduce unit costs through volume discounts. They will reduce complexity, parts counts, and inventories since every car will take the same screen. They will reduce development time and cost, not only for the initial release but for every single update that comes later.

    But above all, it seems to be a well-demonstrated fact that all reviewers, all magazines, and a huge majority of the buying public lusts after that screen. It really sets Tesla apart from other brands, and that kind of appeal and brand distinction should not be lightly set aside. What Tesla really needs is to sell more cars, not to shave $100 off the parts bill in each car.
     
  12. brianman

    brianman Burrito Founder

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    17,515
    Or add a scrollbar.
     
  13. ElSupreme

    ElSupreme Model S 03182

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    4,303
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I agree but remember that if they really sell 100,000 a year, and they save $100 per car. You end up with $10,000,000! Saving a few bucks on the cost of the cars equals large amounts on the tail end. On a $50,000 it doesn't seem like $100 is a lot, but at these high production rates they equal real money.\

    I do agree making your car appealing and selling a couple hundred extra is better than shaving a few bucks from the parts cost. I generally think you want to make the most appealing car (for a new Model or version change) you can and sell it where you just barely make money then work on reducing costs to where your profits start to roll in. Granted you have to make sure you gain cost reductions as you produce more and more from the beginning.
     
  14. Rodolfo Paiz

    Rodolfo Paiz Fidelius Family Office

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    788
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Yes, it's definitely real money. My take is that the $10M in additional parts cost is a worthwhile investment because it might mean that they sell 120,000 instead of 100,000, and are able to make more overall profit than they would have otherwise, also allowing for a greater probability of long-term survival and success. To make a more informed and accurate decision, one needs to be on the inside with a lot more data.
     
  15. vfx

    vfx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    14,790
    Location:
    CA CA
    While I think they could squeeze the Model S and X 17 inch screen in the Blugenlll the question comes about the coming supercar. That might be a reason to make a 14ish inch screen that would work for both the smaller sized platform cars.
     
  16. eledille

    eledille TMS 85 owner :)

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Messages:
    535
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Adding motors doesn't help when the battery is the bottleneck. MSP strains the battery to the max with its 310 kW, so AWD will provide more traction, but probably not more power.
     
  17. TEG

    TEG Teslafanatic

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    21,703
    Yeah, +1... If the GenIII is a "3/4 sized Model S", then it make sense to shrink the screen down a bit, but keeping the pixel count the same (by way of more desnse pixel pitch) means that all the software should run the same without having to change anything. Basically the "Tesla 'retina' touchscreen."

    - - - Updated - - -

    We need ultra-capacitors for short bursts of high C-rate power!
     
  18. EV_QC

    EV_QC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Messages:
    17
  19. Hache

    Hache Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    76
    :crying: Remember the time when some websites were awfully designed for smaller screen, and you had to use the left/right scrollbar to see the full width ? :crying:
    I'd rather have 2 option panels than 1 I have to scroll through. :wink:
     
  20. eledille

    eledille TMS 85 owner :)

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Messages:
    535
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Ouch... expensive... :)
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC