Actually, what I think you are referring to is the
DGX-1. This is the large expensive rack unit that the neural-network learning/development/definition is done on. The resultant neural network defined set is then run in real time on much smaller-platforms, such as the
DRIVE PX/PX 2 platforms, or whatever NVIDIA hardware Tesla is implementing.
Nope, I actually did mean the DRIVE PX 2. I didn't know about the DGX-1 though, so now my confusion is complete
Actually, after reading the article on
anandtech.com where the Titan and Drive PX 2 are mentioned, I now again believe both the Titan X and the DRIVE PX 2 are intended to be used in consumer cars, with the DRIVE PX 2 being the more powerful option (6x the power of Titan X).
After all, if only the neural network training requires supercomputers, why not just feed them the recordings of sensor data back in the office? How come did NVIDIA then make an effort to design the DRIVE PX 2 to be able to be powered and fit into cars, especially electric cars?
E.g. Volvo will use 100 DRIVE PX 2 units:
NVIDIA's Deep Learning Car Computer Selected by Volvo on Journey Toward a Crash-Free Future
But
wccftech.com (amongst other sites) mentions the DRIVE PX 2 has a price tag of US$15.000, which is just crazy.
So it seems Tesla picked the cheaper, less powerful Titan X, probably feeling that the Tesla Neural Net doesn't require a more powerful, expensive processing unit for proper functioning.
Here Jen-Hsun mentions the Titan X GPU being used to run a NVIDIA DriveNet neural network at 50fps:
At 6 mins in he also mentions that the Deep Neural Net will ultimately run on the DRIVE PX 2.