TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

USA Today says fuel cell vehicles are "Electrics Done Right"

Discussion in 'Electric Vehicles' started by Atebit, Sep 20, 2014.

  1. Atebit

    Atebit Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Messages:
    273
    Location:
    PA
  2. vinnie97

    vinnie97 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    540
    Location:
    southwest
    Hyundai must've made a handsome payoff for that puff piece.
     
  3. TES-E

    TES-E Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2014
    Messages:
    373
    Location:
    Casa Grande, AZ
    +1..... I could not agree more.
     
  4. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,399
    Location:
    San Diego
    It really doesn't matter what USA Today publishes, fuel cell vehicles just are not going to catch on.
     
  5. tom66

    tom66 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2013
    Messages:
    622
    Location:
    United Kingdom


    But you can charge it in 45 minutes at a SuC... for free.
    Depending on where you fuel up and who has fueled up before, it could take between 5 and 60 minutes to get fueled with hydrogen.
     
  6. GabrielB

    GabrielB MS-P85, Vette GS-Conv ;(

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2014
    Messages:
    79
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    #6 GabrielB, Sep 21, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2014
    Just what we need; a bunch of high pressure hydrogen fuel tanks driving all over town. Sooner or later a high pressure hydrogen fuel tank will fail, a high pressure filling station accident will occur, or a loose hydrogen fuel line fitting (we are talking about 3000psi like a SCUBA tank) will fail, and that explosion will be like another Hindenburg. I do not think the hydrocarbon fuel companies, or car manufactures dependent on hydrocarbon fuel, or politicians elected by lobbyists for hydrocarbon fuel, will stop pushing the Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle until a dozen or so people are killed in really spectacular hydrogen fuel explosion accidents. Then they'll say maybe HFCVs were not such a good idea.
    Remember that a liquid gasoline fuel tank is not under pressure. In an accident, it is the low pressure gasoline vapor that ignites and explodes, and then the spilled liquid gasoline continues to burn in flame.
    If a high pressure hydrogen fuel tank or fuel line fails, 3000psi hydrogen will escape and very rapidly fill the air/car, and that explosion will knockdown any buildings in the vicinity. The "fuel" will all be gone, and it is only secondary materials caught in the path that may continue to burn. I am sorry folks. HFCV; it's just not a very rosy picture.

    Oops, my mistake. Not 3,000psi, it is 10,000psi !!!
     
  7. araxara

    araxara S-P85#3,218 X-90D#3,299

    Joined:
    May 11, 2012
    Messages:
    692
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ
    I’m not personally interested in HFCV, but I think you are under a misconception as to how hydrogen can fail vs. gasoline (the HFCV is on the left; gas car on the right):
    View attachment 59595
    See Hydrogen Safety
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Iz

    Iz EVs are here to stay

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,074
    Location:
    New York
    No Frunk! Perhaps an unintentional consequence of the HFCV market is to replace gasoline vehicles in a manner that eliminates oil/petro but maintains many of the same engine components. Looking at the photo in the OP link, an untrained eye would not know the difference between HFCV and ICE when looking under the hood. This might have less of an impact on suppliers. IMO I prefer my Model S frunk. The best manner in which to get and store hydrogen is to build huge straws that jut out into space and literally suck the hydrogen back to Earth.
     
  9. Zythryn

    Zythryn MS 70D, MX 90D

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,660
    Location:
    Minnesota
    So let's see here...

    Performance: EV
    Cargo space; EV
    Safety: going out on a limb, EV
    Convenience of fueling: EV
    Cost: tie
    Ability to go 350 miles really fast within 175 miles of a hydrogen pump: FCV (after it gets up to speed)
    Infrastructure paid by all taxpayers vs product owners: FCV (if you call that a win)
    Cost of fuel: EV

    Not sure how they come to the conclusion FCVs are EVs done right when comparing with the Models S.
     
  10. gavine

    gavine Petrol Head turned EV Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    1,008
    Location:
    Southern New Jersey
    9.1 hours to charge Tesla is misleading. We don't wait until "empty" and charge to 100%. Non EV owners fail to realize that we charge every night in our garage for 2 to 3 hours. The article also conveniently failed to mention SuperChargers.
     
  11. Saghost

    Saghost Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2013
    Messages:
    2,998
    Location:
    Delaware
    It also failed to compare the MPGe numbers, 0-60 times/power, or trunk space - all big wins for the Tesla I believe.

    They conveniently get in their dig about the Model S's high price, without mentioning that Hyundai would have to charge more than that to make a profit if they sold the FCV instead of leasing.

    As usual for a mainstream media Fuel Cell piece, it mentions the water coming out of the exhaust as the only pollution, without considering where the hydrogen comes from - either the pollution of steam reformation of natural gas or the massive efficiency loss of hydrolysis.

    Just a little spin going on here...
    Walter
     
  12. Merrill

    Merrill Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,096
    Location:
    Sonoma, California
    Wow, how misleading is that piece. Electrics done right, not to mention that you cannot refuel unless you live near a refueling station and where are they, now where.
     
  13. ZsoZso

    ZsoZso Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2014
    Messages:
    358
    Location:
    Brampton, Ontario
    Not to mention the major misconception of charging (9 hours) vs filling up at the H2 station (5 minutes). The reality is:

    - charging happens at your garage while you sleep every night, effective time spent / wasted: ~ 5 second per day (the time to plug in)
    - for H2 filling, even if you live in one of the 2 cities where it is possible, you probably don't live next-door to the station, you may need to drive 10-15 minutes to get there, fill-up for 5 minutes, then drive back: effective time spent / wasted on filling up: ~ 30 minutes
    - option of home charging an EV is available to the vast majority of the driver population (I'd estimate about 70-80%)
    - option of H2 filling is available only to those drivers living in LA, which is a small fraction of the total driver population, well below 1%
     
  14. dsm363

    dsm363 Roadster + Sig Model S

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    18,235
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Funny article. Electric vehicles done right but you can't buy the car or get fuel for it outside LA for the most part.
     
  15. jerry33

    jerry33 S85 - VIN:P05130 - 3/2/13

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    12,753
    Location:
    Texas
    That's only the case for one kind of failure, but if that tank ruptures (I believe Toyota's is 10,000 psi) it's not going to be a nice jet of flame as shown. Here's a test of an SUV tire. The pressure isn't shown, but I would expect it to be about 150 psi. at the time of failure. Note that oxygen was used to increase the explosion.
     
  16. richkae

    richkae VIN587

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,917
    "Power is sufficient, if not exciting in the fuel-cell model" which is their way of glossing over the fact that it is gutless.
    The 0-60 is 11.5 seconds versus 8.7 seconds in the ICE version - and the word they choose is "sufficient".

    - - - Updated - - -

    The time to fill the Tucson is quoted at 10 minutes, not 5. That is 5x slower than an ICE car. I cannot imagine an impatient, go anywhere I want right now, petrolhead being happy standing next to the pump for 10 minutes. It is not long enough to do anything useful and it is too short to wander away.
     
  17. EarlyAdopter

    EarlyAdopter Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    2,497
    Location:
    Redmond, WA
    These sorts of pieces make me laugh. No doubt a hundred years ago there were similar articles on "horseless carriages done right" from a horse economy and experience point-of-view.

    In the end, I believe the significant advantages and day-to-day convienence of BEV will win out in the marketplace.

    It's just as well this misguided sentiment remains out there in the media for now. There just isn't enough battery production online yet to satisfy demand that if everyone realized the truth.
     
  18. vinnie97

    vinnie97 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    540
    Location:
    southwest
    I'm a non-EV owner currently (hybrid only), and even *I* know this. :)
     
  19. William13

    William13 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    943
    Location:
    South Bend
    I believe cost analysis is very important. The lease cost was $500 per month? Isn't a Tesla the same?
    Time 10 minutes twice a week. Tesla 10 seconds every day.
    Range 120 miles from a fueling station. Tesla 120 miles from my house or 120 miles from the nearest electric plug. Reasonably 120 miles from any Supercharger.
    Safety low for collision? Tesla high safety.
    Rollover?
    Explosive versus compartmentalized burn. (Firecracker with Roman candles on video of wrecked stolen Tesla).

    Dull versus exciting. Hyundai reminds us of the brand of environmentalism that promoted a future where one could only expect less and less. Tesla shows us not to fear a bleak carbon neutral future but to be excited about the future.

    No contest. FCV will not survive. Tesla inspired EVs will prevail. Darwin wins again.
     
  20. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,399
    Location:
    San Diego
    20,000 miles on my Tesla, 1.5 years, a couple of dozen road trips where I charged on the road or at destination. Total time spent waiting for refueling: 0 minutes.

    People need to start understanding that charging up a Model S is like charging up your iPhone - you do it overnight, or while eating lunch and no time is wasted.

    Gas cars and FCV, on the other hand...
     

Share This Page