TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

User Datapoint: Ambient Temperature vs Charge

Discussion in 'Model S: Battery & Charging' started by suraj1194, May 3, 2017.

  1. suraj1194

    suraj1194 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Location:
    Bay Area CA
    I have an interesting datapoint on doing the same ~125 mile drive at about the same time, within two minutes of the same drive duration, in successive weeks with significantly different ambient temps.

    Total drive duration: 1:55
    Distance: 124miCabin temperature: 74
    Wheels/tires: 19" with Goodyear Eagle Tesla-foarm Touring, approx 20K miles.

    I set AP to 75mph continuously with some places where I boosted it 5mph to overtake the right lane and move over for advancing traffic behind me. Mild freeway traffic overall.

    Last week: temps in low 60s during drive
    Today: temps 85-90

    Before both drives, car was range charged to 249mi. Range mode on.

    Rated range after drive:
    Last week: 118mi
    Today: 131 mile

    So with temps in between 60-70, the range for a 124 mile drive dropped from 249 to 118 (131 miles equivalent). Today, the same drive utilize 118 miles, or 6 miles less than the actual distance, despite driving at 75mph most of the while with A/C on. Very nice indeed. I expected more residual range due to higher ambient temps, but not more than a dozen miles more.
     
  2. Missile Toad

    Missile Toad Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2016
    Messages:
    369
    Location:
    Houston
    Was there a difference in the headwinds to the tune of about 6.5 MPH? That will get you an 11% difference in apparent efficiency. Go to wunderground.com and see which way the winds were blowing on each day. I would guess the use of AC to adjust temps about 15-20º F produces at most a 2% change in actual RM used for a given trip.
     
  3. suraj1194

    suraj1194 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Location:
    Bay Area CA
    Thanks for your response. Very interesting question. The data from a few waypoints suggests winds of ~5-10MPH in the southerly direction. The route is ~50% westbound, and the rest S/SW bound (I-80 followed by I-680). I checked waypoints along both stretches. I've been getting fairly consistent numbers similar to the ones from last week for about a month or more under different conditions, prior to the much higher temperatures in the Bay Area these past few days. I pretty much always end up with 110-120 miles of remaining rated range after this drive, and today's the first time since last summer that I recall seeing 130+ .
     
  4. Missile Toad

    Missile Toad Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2016
    Messages:
    369
    Location:
    Houston
    My 70D gets about 290 wh/mi in no-wind situations at about 70 MPH. I put together a table a while back. Pure crosswind at 7 MPH makes it 293 wh/mi and a 45º cross/headwind is about 311 wh/mi. As you drove half and half, I'm going to split the difference and call it 297 or so. So penalize your recent trip 2.3% because of 'conditions'.
    Can you lookup your earlier trip? Did you have tail-winds? Maybe on the order of 4 MPH? One thing that can make a huge difference, regardless of the wind, is if you drive in a herd of other cars, and can benefit from drafting/sheltering effects. Maybe you had more of that in your first drive?
     
  5. suraj1194

    suraj1194 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Location:
    Bay Area CA
    Thank you for the excellent details! I'm fairly certain I don't have such fine grained data on the two trips :) My most notable datapoint was the end SoC of >130mi and the rated mile consumption < actual range, which I hadn't seen since late last summer. Since we're currently experiencing the hottest temps since the end of last summer, I assumed the temperature had a major role to play in this. Until now, through fall, winter and spring, I'd always gotten 115-122 or so leftover rated miles on this weekly drive.

    Working back from 75kwh and 249mi total rated miles, that 301 wh/mi I was getting somewhere in the 300-320 wh/mi for a long time. The fact that I consumed fewer than actual miles suggests I dipped under that level. Does the A/c blowing slightly cold (75) use less juice than when the heater runs with the thermostat at ~72, as it's been doing for months now ?
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC