rolosrevenge
Dr. EVS
There seems to be a few companies trying. The exciting thing about Model S is that with 20 kW chargers, a mere 50 could get to the 1 MW threshold. I think a pilot project is in order.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There seems to be a few companies trying. The exciting thing about Model S is that with 20 kW chargers, a mere 50 could get to the 1 MW threshold. I think a pilot project is in order.
Well, each car would need to be plugged in to a 20 kW charger. I should contact Tesla about working with them on this.
I agree. I already have figured out how dispatch would work as well.
hope you will post some comments when/if you get the project running
A check on this -- if the vehicles are charging at 20 kW, they'll charge twice as fast and you'll be able to sell the regulation service they offer in half of the hours. Of course, it's better to have the flexibility of the 20 kW chargers, but the real constraint is the battery size. Once the car is charged, it can't provide additional regulation.There seems to be a few companies trying. The exciting thing about Model S is that with 20 kW chargers, a mere 50 could get to the 1 MW threshold. I think a pilot project is in order.
A check on this -- if the vehicles are charging at 20 kW, they'll charge twice as fast and you'll be able to sell the regulation service they offer in half of the hours. Of course, it's better to have the flexibility of the 20 kW chargers, but the real constraint is the battery size. Once the car is charged, it can't provide additional regulation.
This is the same optimization problem that pumped storage facilities have. You have to take into account both the flow limit and the energy limit. The good news is that we've got pretty good heuristics for optimizing pumped storage.
- - - Updated - - -
rolo, you've been following this project, I assume? East Penn Technology
What @rolosrevenge has in mind is different: in his idea, the vehicle doesn't put power onto the grid, so there's no degradation of the battery. Instead, he would control the rate of charging in response to grid conditions, which shouldn't harm the battery. Done right, such grid-controlled charging could be valuable to the EV owner, the charging aggregator, and society generally.I would never want V2G. I do not want to waste the life of my EV battery.
Yes, but ... the parking operator needs to know what the requirements of the EV owners will be. If I'm just parking for 4 hours and am counting on getting at least 30kWh of charge, I'd be very annoyed to find that the parking operator instead added only 5kWh of charge to sell the regulation-down from my car.What if a parking house operator equips all slots with smart EVSE? Would it be a business case to sell the managed electric demand of some 500 parked vehicles?
He could attract EVs, or - dare I say - plug in hybrids by offering parking capacity in a location where that comes at a price - say downtown NYC.
What @rolosrevenge has in mind is different: in his idea, the vehicle doesn't put power onto the grid, so there's no degradation of the battery. Instead, he would control the rate of charging in response to grid conditions, which shouldn't harm the battery. Done right, such grid-controlled charging could be valuable to the EV owner, the charging aggregator, and society generally.
If the owner can schedule with the car when he would like it charged by, and the car can send that to the aggregator, it can be scheduled with almost 100% certainty that the car will be charged when it's supposed to, so there'll be no noticeable effect on the customer, unless they come for it early.+1
This is the exact idea I pitched to my energy/utility corporation during my 20+ year career there - the only downside is shorting the EV of energy the owner expected but would be a nice alternative to load shedding when the grid is in crisis state and they would not have gotten the energy anyway - demand Management is a viable ancillary versus regulation.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Deciphering: PJM has a ways to go before it can use distributed DR to provide ancillary services, like regulation.As set forth in the enclosed responses, PJM is not presently capable of detecting
load reductions attributable to such pre- or post-commitment Limited DR activity,
because Demand Resources are not required by the PJM Tariff to have in place the real-
time telemetry that PJM requires of generation Capacity Resources. While it is
conceivable that Limited DR could gradually ramp down pre-commitment, or gradually
ramp-up post-commitment, such ramping cannot be separately distinguished in real-time
from other load changes, and therefore it is not presently predictable, dispatchable, or
verifiable in real time. Consequently, PJM dispatchers are not in a position to reasonably
rely on any pre- or post-commitment activity by Limited DR when they make their
dispatch decisions. Similarly, PJM’s other reliability planning studies make the same
type of assumption that PJM made in this proceeding, i.e., that Demand Resources will
respond to the maximum extent they are required to respond. In short, the approach PJM
has adopted in this proceeding is consistent with both its operations and its reliability
planning.