TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Video: Falcon Heavy | Flight Animation

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by doug, Jan 27, 2015.

  1. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    15,914
    Location:
    Stanford, California
    #1 doug, Jan 27, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2016
  2. Discoducky

    Discoducky Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,884
    Location:
    Seattle
    So cool to see all stages landing
     
  3. StephenM

    StephenM Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,113
    This is so freakin' cool! Gotta share this :smile:
     
  4. ggr

    ggr Roadster R80 537, SigS P85 29

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,485
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    For the retro- and re-entry burns, it appears to show all the engines firing, but I believe only three of them do. It correctly shows only one for the actual landings though.
     
  5. dhanson865

    dhanson865 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,499
    Location:
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    I think the final firing at landing is only the central engine. leaving the other 8 engines idle.
     
  6. ggies07

    ggies07 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,263
    Location:
    Ft. Worth, TX
    Sweetness!
     
  7. ToddRLockwood

    ToddRLockwood Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,263
    Location:
    Burlington, Vermont
    This is freaky-close to being reality.
     
  8. mdevp

    mdevp Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Messages:
    454
    Location:
    nj
    Amazing stuff, thanks for this.
     
  9. rabar10

    rabar10 FFE until Model 3

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,333
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    I doubt the center core will come all the way back to the launchpad for its landing -- it's going much faster horizontally than the two side cores when the second stage separates and it has to come back. Much more likely for it to land on some island a ways off the coast, or on the "spaceport barge" parked out at sea.

    But with SpaceX, who knows? If you nail the reuse part, the payload hit can be absorbed -- it could become cheaper to launch the same payload weight from a fully-reused Heavy with all 3 cores returning to Canaveral, than it would be to launch-and-throw-away a single-core Falcon 9...
     
  10. Bgarret

    Bgarret Model S ownin' Michigan scofflaw

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Messages:
    777
    Location:
    Michigan
    This is Space-porn. Everyone should be careful if you save it on your computer. I love all the nit-picking - what about the fact that the two stages don't land in unison....Elon would never stand for that.
     
  11. nwdiver

    nwdiver Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Messages:
    2,413
    Location:
    United States
    Maybe it lands after an orbit...
     
  12. dhanson865

    dhanson865 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,499
    Location:
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    if he can put up with slightly missing the barge the first time he'll be ok with a few seconds out of synch on the landing if they both hit the correct mark. :)
     
  13. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    10,402
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    It most certainly is. And I love it!
     
  14. mknox

    mknox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    8,570
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    #14 mknox, Jan 28, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2016
    Have they given up on bringing the second stage back?

     
  15. Doug_G

    Doug_G Lead Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    15,853
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Probably. There's a lot less bang for the buck bringing back the second stage. The cost (in terms of payload weight) of additional fuel is worse, and the payback (one engine and much smaller stage) is much less.
     
  16. dhanson865

    dhanson865 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,499
    Location:
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    why do you ask that? the video shows it coming back.
     
  17. RobinF

    RobinF Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    @Doug_G is correct. The second stage recovery was always a long range idea at best. The first Heavy launch is schedule for this year (3rd quarter) but it's a demo flight and I don't know if they will attempt a landing of the core stages. Actually I doubt that the Air Force will have them cleared for shore landings by that time anyway.

    - - - Updated - - -

    The video actually shows the central core stage coming back but that's still part of the first stage. The second stage has a single Merlin engine.
     
  18. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    15,914
    Location:
    Stanford, California
    The second stage reentry with a heat shield was for me the most surprising part when I first saw that video with the Muse soundtrack.
     
  19. action7981

    action7981 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    79
    Location:
    So-Cal
    It looks like they have changed the design of the second stage. It appears that the "skin" of the second stage stays with the first stage. The second stage slides out of the rocket shell most likely making the second stage less expensive and easier to manufacture. It would be interesting to know the cost of the items they are discarding (second stage without outer shell and fairings) and what proportion that is of the cost of the whole rocket. I imagine it's a very small percent.
     
  20. Grendal

    Grendal Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    2,521
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    I wonder how many Dragon Version 2 capsules they will have to throw away during the testing phase? Those are reusable too but everything says that they won't be making any powered landings with it for quite a while. For now, it seems as though they aren't really interested in recovering the second stage. It makes sense since it probably isn't too cost effective. I'd think you'd need to maximize the usability over recoverability for that stage. Just a WAG but I'd guess that the three booster stages would account for at least 75% of the cost of the rocket excluding payload.
     

Share This Page