This is crazy. Either it is some community of 20 or so residences, or the Tzar's winter pallace. My 2000 sf house never uses more than 25 kWh a day either with peak winter heating or peak summer cooling with a Heat Pump AND Tesla charging.
Spending just a little on insulation and passive heating might be 10 times as cost-effective.
We actually upgraded our attic insulation from R-36 to R-90 after having the ceilings air sealed in the attic. We also replaced all of our windows and replaced our propane furnace with a ground source heat pump, and have added direct solar PV water heating. There are significant differences in home energy usages between Flagstaff, AZ where you live and Cheyenne, WY where we live.
On an annual basis we produce more electricity than we consume. One of the technical challenges for us is to balance generation and usage in order to minimize utilizing the grid. This is where the batteries fit into our system beyond being a backup source of electricity during grid outages.
Our home is all electric. We monitor our electricity use using SENSE (R) which helps us understand which which devices are using electric at any given moment as well as daily, weekly, monthly
, and annual consumption. It also gives a comparison of our electricity usage with other homes equipped with SENSE (R) in Wyoming and the United States. While our electric vehicles account for ~30 kWh/day, our overall daily use of electricity in February 2021 was ~102 kWh/day, which is the average in Wyoming for typical homes which also have fossil fuel heating. Nationally in the United States the average electricity use for the same period was 69 kWh/day.
There are 100,000 BTUs per therm of natural gas. There are 91,740 Btus per gallon of propane. There are 3413 BTUs per kilowatt hour of electricity.
Comparing electric home heating to combustion is not intuitive because it takes a large quantity of electricity to creating the same amount of heat as combustion, but because electricity can be made by renewable sources, when it is sourced that way it remains the environmentally better wat to do it. That does not make it cheaper in the short term. When people talk about monetary costs, rarely do they include the environmental costs of man made climate change or the health impacts of air pollution. From my perspective, fossil fuel use can be seemingly cheaper for the end user, but that is due to cost shifting the real expenses of environmental and health impacts on to others.
Here is a link to information about SENSE (R):
Sense: Track energy use in real time to make your home more energy efficient.
It's a device / system we use. Others may use other similar equipment. I'm posting the link so you can understand what I referred to, not trying to promote it.