software is their limiting factor and it can be improved upon and corrected quickly and easily.
I lol'ed at the last 3 words. Wait, you were serious?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
software is their limiting factor and it can be improved upon and corrected quickly and easily.
I lol'ed at the last 3 words. Wait, you were serious?
Absolutely, why would you think otherwise? Do you have some reason why you would find that to be funny? Using Tesla as a benchmark for your expectations is the only reason I can think of, but they are the exception to this, not the norm.
Jeff
Tesla aside.
From previous software development experience it's almost never "quick and easy".
Couple that with previous algorithm development, training and retesting it's definitely not quick nor easy, and can easily take months for a patch that will fix item Z to be deployed in the field, because you have to make sure your patch didn't break items A-Y.
Understood completely, perhaps I should have qualified what I meant by "quick and easy". The quick is in the rate the patch can be deployed, and the easy is in reference to comparing how difficult it is to teach a human a new thing or a new habit.
My lack of explanation for my word usage is on me, I can certainly see how quick and easy could be taken as fast and simple.
Jeff
Understood completely, perhaps I should have qualified what I meant by "quick and easy". The quick is in the rate the patch can be deployed, and the easy is in reference to comparing how difficult it is to teach a human a new thing or a new habit.
My lack of explanation for my word usage is on me, I can certainly see how quick and easy could be taken as fast and simple.
Jeff
OP: - please remember to update us on what Tesla will report on the incident after analyzing its logs. My concern is this may get lost in the thread - it appears the thread now has a life of its own, and it took a turn toward discussions of a more ..... philosophic nature .
OP: - please remember to update us on what Tesla will report on the incident after analyzing its logs. My concern is this may get lost in the thread - it appears the thread now has a life of its own, and it took a turn toward discussions of a more ..... philosophic nature .
It's easily flying an unmanned plane from LA to Chicago, it's not even close. While they may fly in an somewhat controlled environment, highly controlled is a stretch, the challenges they face are far greater than ground based transportation, specifically during takeoff and landing. Regarding the scenario you mention, in an autonomous world, all the cars are communicating with each other leaving the only real wild card to be pedestrians and while that wildcard is not to be overlooked, it is addressable. Again, this is software we're talking about. The simple fact that you admit that humans "make surprisingly few mistakes" pretty much validates the entire point around autonomous driving. Machines don't make mistakes, the software is their limiting factor and it can be improved upon and corrected quickly and easily.
And yes you are wrong, whether you understand or agree with my conclusion matters not. Luckily for us you aren't responsible for making policy decisions. Humans are deeply flawed and deeply inconsistent from one human to the next. Machines are not. Granted their software is their limiting factor but that shouldn't be seen as a negative as software is binary and fixable. Humans aren't.
Jeff
Right. I'm sure that the deer that leaps out of the park onto the road will also be incredibly connected. I don't believe that you have any idea how much opposition this "autonomous" world of your utopia is going to meet.
Right. I'm sure that the deer that leaps out of the park onto the road will also be incredibly connected. I don't believe that you have any idea how much opposition this "autonomous" world of your utopia is going to meet.
BTW, it would be quite funny to see how many of these Teslas "summoned" to drive from L.A. to NYC on their own would e.g. get bogged down in some field in the Midwest because they couldn't handle some deviation with confusing signage.
FWIW I too have had to "catch" my car before it rear-ended the person in front of me. A few times. With the newer AP display that shows more than one car, the times I have had to intervene the display showed that it didn't detect any cars ahead of me or in the nearby lanes. All the while autosteer+TACC are doing their job.
I took it in after once or twice (pre-autosteer days) and service said everything checked out. Meanwhile I am seeing occasional times where the radar or whatever is causing the display to show the vehicle in front of my jumping forward and backward wildly.
Whether a software or hardware issue, both TACC and Autosteer are only 80% reliable in my book.
must.resist.correcting.grammar
No, I'm weak. You snooze you lose, a moose is loose.
FWIW I too have had to "catch" my car before it rear-ended the person in front of me. A few times. With the newer AP display that shows more than one car, the times I have had to intervene the display showed that it didn't detect any cars ahead of me or in the nearby lanes. All the while autosteer+TACC are doing their job.
I took it in after once or twice (pre-autosteer days) and service said everything checked out. Meanwhile I am seeing occasional times where the radar or whatever is causing the display to show the vehicle in front of my jumping forward and backward wildly.