Oh my.
There is indeed a battery buffer, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near 10%. But regardless, are you aware that it is possible to brick your battery, for it to totally die and not be able to be revived? It’s not like a gas tank where you just need someone to bring you a gallon of emergency fuel. Please spend a little time to read the owner’s manual, especially the battery information section.
There are Tesla owners who are extreme in never wanting the car to go below 50%, but you seem to be the other extreme. Extreme highs and extreme lows really aren’t good for the battery. I do them when necessitated for a trip segment, but in day to day use, what is the point in going above 90% and below 20% without a need?
And what energy graph is going down to -25%? The energy graphs are in units of Wh/mile and they go negative because you can put energy back into the battery as you go downhill and from regenerative braking.
The -25% is in the 'energy' menu..... click on not 'consumption'. but the other option...... this is the line graph that shows your predicted and actual energy usage from Origin to Destination.
This goes down to -25%
This fact would imply that that a -10% is indeed possible. This may be used as a diagnostics tool for tesla to track if people have gone to -10% on the 'graph'. which probably really corresponds to actual 0% on the battery
Otherwise how do you explain this 'negative' territory?
Why go below 20%? Because there is a need, the need of prompt transportation. If i'm taking a road trip, sometimes I may want to minimize stops in the interest of expediency. Therefore, I would choose to use the full range of my vehicle as per the technological instruments which monitor this. If these instruments allow me to go to a '0%' which compromises the long term usability of my battery, then this is a problem. It puts the onus on the consumer to be the engineer. It would be like building a bridge rated only for the stated load, or a wheelbarrow rated only for the stated load, without a design factor. It would never happen in any competent engineering world. I highly doubt Tesla has neglected a safety factor here.
Let's say I am wrong and going to 0% indeed leads to battery degredation which would materially and significantly impact the future range of the vehicle. Even in that case, I'll still take it to zero, because I respect my time, time is money.'
If my car eventually has 85% or 80%, or 70% of original battery capacity, I'll sell it and get a new one with 100%. To do any otherwise and to put my car's 'battery health based on an assumption of future decline in capacity which'. would be to value money before my own time. This type of thinking is what leads to poverty, that money is worth more than your own time. A man who wishes to build his wealth must value his time as the utmost and most precious commodity, above resale value of the car, above dollars. Time comes first.