What did you Order?

[scottsk]

I think this is how...at the top, set the edition to production - that should exclude all the sigs.

I'm the report that comes up, look at the drive train...standard should be the # of 90s and the sum of performance and ludicrous should be the number of p90s.

Actually that is not quite right...I think you need to subtract the number of 70s in the battery section from the standard drive train to get the number of 90s.

 

[K-MTG]

Actually that is not quite right...I think you need to subtract the number of 70s in the battery section from the standard drive train to get the number of 90s.

I can't see the option, I only see the battery type which is not helpful to distinguish 90D and P90D. What are the numbers of P90D and 90D so far on the tracker

 

[pvogel]

Look at the 'drive train' section in addition to the battery section.

This particular report was filtered to production edition only

Oops. No it wasn't--- showing 'all' at the top...

 

[SunMileX]

90D
Blue
Tan seats
Figured Ash
Black headliner
6 seats
20s
Autopilot
Winter package
Tow package
High Amp charger

Bioweapon defense filter remains on wishlist, but hopefully air quality in Denver remains breathable without it...

 

[scottsk]

I can't see the option, I only see the battery type which is not helpful to distinguish 90D and P90D. What are the numbers of P90D and 90D so far on the tracker

I am using the configuration popularity report...I set the edition to production. The relevant section of the report looks like:

First there is some missing information here. 348 people have configured battery while only 342 people have configured drive train, so the math isn't 100% accurate...

The easy calc is the number of p90s...it should be the number of performance plus the number of ludicrous. So this comes to 137. The standard drive train is a mix of 90s and 70s. If you look at the 70s under battery, you can see there are 21. Subtract the 70s from the standard drive train and you are left with 184 90s. So, the final tally would be:

P90: 137
90: 184
70: 21

Note that this is my interpretation of the data and I could be totally wrong

 

[scottsk]

I am using the configuration popularity report...I set the edition to production. The relevant section of the report looks like:

First there is some missing information here. 348 people have configured battery while only 342 people have configured drive train, so the math isn't 100% accurate...

The easy calc is the number of p90s...it should be the number of performance plus the number of ludicrous. So this comes to 137. The standard drive train is a mix of 90s and 70s. If you look at the 70s under battery, you can see there are 21. Subtract the 70s from the standard drive train and you are left with 184 90s. So, the final tally would be:

P90: 137
90: 184
70: 21

Note that this is my interpretation of the data and I could be totally wrong

Crap that is the wrong screenshot (it includes the sigs)...here is the correct one.

 

[MrBoylan]

Great, i just came back from CES as well from Las Vegas. Hoping to see a Model x at the Panasonic booth but guess what, it's a Model S. Still very nice car but i prefer to see what my future car look like. Nice trip though. I originally was thinking to go moderate on my configuration, 90D etc. but getting so frustrated on waiting and the time i have waited allowed me to save up for all the upgrade so i just went ahead and select every possible options there. Impulsive buyer ah?

There was apparently a Model X parked out front at the MGM at some point during CES (possibly just a guest at the hotel) but I didn't see it. One of my buddies from Panasonic did. I was too busy shuttling back and forth between my hotel, Mandalay Bay for press stuff, the Venetian and the LVCC for the exhibits. And yeah, I guess even Panasonic wasn't able to get a hold of a Model X for the show. The one they had last year was one of the prototypes.

-CB

 

[K-MTG]

Was the 90D ever at Early 2016?

 

[hill]

With all the web & software folk at Tesla - it's kind of quirky that the config page renders as 7 seats, even if you plug 5 into the mix.
.

 

[MrBoylan]

Was the 90D ever at Early 2016?

I don't think so. When I did the Design Studio walkthrough video on December 10, it was early 2016 for the P90D, mid 2016 for the 90D and mid to late 2016 for the 70D. Here's a point in the video where you can see that screen:

Tesla Model X Production Design Studio Walkthrough - YouTube

-CB

 

[goneskiian]

Was the 90D ever at Early 2016?

Yes. There was a thread started when that showed in the configurator.

90D Deliveries Begin Early 2016

 

[K-MTG]

Yes. There was a thread started when that showed in the configurator.

90D Deliveries Begin Early 2016

Does anyone currently see it as early 2016? Perhaps those early reservation holders that didn't order and still have access to the design studio. (mine shows mid 2016 when I ordered but I reserved late) Is it possible to confirm sooner? Mine is set to confirm on the 18th currently.

 

[goneskiian]

Does anyone currently see it as early 2016? Perhaps those early reservation holders that didn't order and still have access to the design studio. (mine shows mid 2016 when I ordered but I reserved late) Is it possible to confirm sooner? Mine is set to confirm on the 18th currently.

It shows as mid 2016 for me. It did change for a while but then changed back. I was invited to configure on 11/30 and haven't yet.

No. There is no way to bypass the 1 week wait for confirmation.

Cheers!

 

[MrBoylan]

Yes. There was a thread started when that showed in the configurator.

90D Deliveries Begin Early 2016

Oh yeah. Forgot about that thread. But no pics so... it didn't happen.

 

[K-MTG]

I wonder how many reservation holders order as well. Did more people order or are still waiting test drive? I don't think it is possible to add multiple polls in a single thread.

 

[aesculus]

Yeah. There should have been an option for:

No. I am waiting to see one/test one.

 

[K-MTG]

Yeah. There should have been an option for:

No. I am waiting to see one/test one.

Posible to add it now? I emailed the admin. I don't want to make another thread.

 

[MikeL]

Just a friendly reminder that "early 2016" is anytime before June 31 :wink: & maybe that extra day stretches thru the holiday weekend, at least in the USA

 

[K-MTG]

Just a friendly reminder that "early 2016" is anytime before June 31 :wink: & maybe that extra day stretches thru the holiday weekend, at least in the USA

Isn't that when delivers begin though, not when all are delivered?

 

[MikeL]

Isn't that when delivers begin though, not when all are delivered?

That's even worse, if you're "expecting"
ha! Goes w my use of the term "delivery room" :smile:
no, I'm not pregnant, but I sure as hell would like to see Tesla gestate a few more Model Xs ...ok back to the rational people -