You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
like any other source of information there is some decent info offered on zero hedge and there is a lot of garbage posted there.Hah. That's funny. Every paragraph is wrong. It's as if Donald Trump decided to tweet about electric vehicles.
Unmasking the Men Behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's Renegade Blog
just like when you go to ant other "news" site a discerning/skeptical approach is necessary when reading this
I regard them all equally, everything you read or see from the media is designed to elicit a certain response. regardless of the source.It is a mistake to regard them all identically.
Full article at:Zero Hedge is a batshit insane Austrian school finance blog run by two pseudonymous founders who post articles under the name "Tyler Durden," after the character from Fight Club. It's essentially apocalypse porn. It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions.[citation NOT needed]
<snip>
Zero Hedge is not quite the NaturalNews of economics, but not for want of trying.
<snip>
I regard them all equally,
Are you sure it's accuracy you want, or conformity with your world view.Consider the possibility that the The BBC World News has earned a greater presumption of accuracy than Breitbart News.
Consider the possibility that the The Atlantic has earned a greater presumption of accuracy than The National Enquirer.
Consider the possibility that CBS News with Scott Kelly has earned your trust more than FOX News.
If you can't figure out that NPR News is entitled to more deference than Rush LImbach or BuzzFeed, then you need to reconsider.
I regard them all equally,
Nice graphic. I hadn't seen that before..... did you have a straight face when you typed that? Even the casual observer can tell pretty quickly that's not true... you have to be FAR more skeptical of some 'news' sources than others... none are perfect but for some perfection isn't even a goal. With some misinformation is a feature not a fault...
Are you sure it's accuracy you want, or conformity with your world view.
.... did you have a straight face when you typed that? Even the casual observer can tell pretty quickly that's not true... you have to be FAR more skeptical of some 'news' sources than others... none are perfect but for some perfection isn't even a goal. With some misinformation is a feature not a fault...
As for the article...
'An electric auto will convert 5-10% of the energy in natural gas into motion. A normal vehicle will convert 20-30% of the energy in gasoline into motion. That's 3 or 4 times more energy recovered with an internal combustion vehicle than an electric vehicle.'
We extract natural gas and burn it in power plants... we DO NOT extract gasoline and burn that in cars. We extract OIL. You lose ~20% of the energy in oil when you refine it into gasoline. Even lower for less conventional sources...
ALSO;
'A natural gas electric generating turbine gets 40% efficiency. A high voltage transformer gets 90% efficiency. A household level transformer gets 50% efficiency. A short transmission line gets 20% loss, which is 80% efficiency. The total is 40% x 90% x 50% x 80% = 14.4% of the energy recovered before the electrical system does something similar to the gasoline engine in the vehicle. Some say the electricity performs a little better in the vehicle, but it's not much.'
Um... no... gas turbines are usually >50% efficient unless it's simple cycle which is uncommon and transmission to homes is usually >85% efficient TOTAL. There's no such thing as a 50% efficient transformer... that just sounds made up... So ~40% of the thermal energy in gas is getting to your wall outlet. Adjusting for charging losses you're still getting ~1/3 and EVs are 3x more efficient than ICE so it usually comes out as a wash... IF you're using fools fuel to generate the electricity... which is declining as we speak
Beyond that we are quickly racking up curtailments. EVs have the unique ability to use energy that would have otherwise literally gone to waste if it weren't used. A curtailed wind farm at 2am is no good to anyone. CAISO curtailed 80GWh in March alone. If we had an EV fleet large enough to absorb that surplus that's 4.8M gallons of gasoline even if they replaced fools fuel cars that got ~50mpg. Free energy. As wind and solar grow this problem will grow too unless we get more flexible demand like EVs out there...
In the mean time I think it's easier for me to drive an electric car,
Few years ago when I got incentive for EV purchase there was one requirement: electricity for that EV must come from clean source.Further, I have changed electric suppliers so that ALL of the electricity I use at my house is from renewable energy. No dinosaurs, actual or metaphorical.