Elon has already been sued a few times over things he tweeted.
Really?
When?
AFAIk the only time was when he tweeted the pedo thing, having nothing to do with cars.
And he
won that one.
The SEC has gone after him for some of the crazy things he's said about the company that violated SEC rules.
They went after him for
one thing he said. Claiming he already has funding secured to take Tesla private.
Again having nothing to do with the actual cars.
Hilariously, the resulting settlement ended up with Elon buying 20 million dollars in TSLA shares, which has since gone by MASSIVELY in value... so the settlement reaped him a huge profit
The principal of the company is assumed to be making official statements about the company whenever they talk about it publicly.
This is factually untrue.
You might want to google "forward looking statements" while you're at it.
To file a civil suit you need to be able to prove that you were harmed in some way, but when the Model 3 was new there was talk from Elon that when FSD became available it could be used as a robo-taxi while you were at work and it would turn into something that made you money rather than cost you money like a conventional car.
"could" is speculative, not factual- especially when disclaimed with "when it becomes available"
There were people who bought FSD on their Model 3s to do just that and they financially stretched themselves further than they normally would have to make the purchase because they believed they would make that money back. Anyone who took a severe financial hit like repossession of the car or bankruptcy because of it would be a good lead plaintiff in a class action suit.
Then the 3 came out FSD was $3000. On a car selling for $50,000-$70,000.
If you get repoed because you spent an extra ~5% of purchase on an option you're an idiot. Best of luck in court on that.
Other plaintiffs in the class would be anyone who
Opted out of the standard arbitration clause- because nobody else
can sue.
If and when Tesla announced that FSD is not actually going to live up to what has been advertised (capable of robo-taxis), everyone who bought FSD will be able to claim they are damaged.
You've finally stumbled upon a factual statement
Well... half of one anyway....
The pre-March 2019 buyers that would be true of... but Tesla only needs refund them ~$3000 each, and there's not THAT many of em so this wouldn't be a big deal financially.
The post March 2019 buyers, the only thing THEY were
actually promised during the purchase that they haven't gotten yet is L2 city street driving.
Which we know
already exists as roughly 2000 Teslas already have it.
It's still going to cost Tesla billions to admit FSD isn't going to happen like they said it would.
You....might wanna check your math there.
Take rate outside the US is nearly 0.
Inside the US it's guesstimated at 20-30 percent....and again only the pre-march-19 buyers would be owed a ~3k refund... which wouldn't come close to billions of dollars.
I saw this recently, I'm not sure if it was in this thread, I don't see a link on this page, but it is relevant:
Tesla 'under Review' At California DMV for 'Full Self Driving' Claims
A ruling from any regulatory agency that FSD's advertising was misleading could open the floodgates.
That is literally not what that article is about. Did you even read it?
The DMV is concerned that FSD does
more than Tesla is advertising (and thus would need special permits and reporting in California during operation).
That's why the threat is on them pulling the permits for Tesla to test L3 or higher vehicles in CA.