Ampster
Active Member
I will answer my own question based on the assumptions I made when building my system. California is moving toward Time of Use rates for all consumers. This was reinforced by NEM 2.0, adopted earlier this year. Most battery storage systems deployed into that changing environment should be able to provide a reasonable payback. Most of those opportunities will come from behind the meter implementations. At some point in the future I hope we have DC to DC charging as well as a NEM arrangement that communicates the optimal time to both use the grid a send power to the grid. For those reasons, I think the evolution of the Powerwall 2.0 is positive. Storage systems like the Powerwall help solve the looming problem of the Duck Curve, by taking the head off the duck.What pricing model will make my system not have a positive payback?
Last edited: