Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!

What's your 90%?

Markk993

Member
May 16, 2016
455
199
Las Vegas
P85+ 2014 with about 24k in mileage...

90% 233 (sometimes 234)
100% (265 both times i did !00%)

Feeling really good about that compared to others here....
 

ArtInCT

Always Learning
Sep 2, 2014
1,713
433
Southern Connecticut
After 15 months of ownership, my P90D, yet once again, shows 234 Rated Miles at 90%.
19,456 miles on the odometer.
When new on 3/3/16 it was 241.
So still about 3% degradation.
Still charging to only to 60% on a daily use basis.
I am on firmware 17.24.28
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHawk

bobjustbob

Elon Musk takes all my money
Mar 6, 2016
83
88
Cumming, GA
I've got 36K on my 2016 Model S 75 RWD. My 90% is 207 and my 100% is 231. (I've ranged charged twice in the last two weeks to see if magical BMS adjustments would occur.) I'm not sure if I should be concerned because these numbers may indicate more degradation than I expected. My car was at a body shop for 16 weeks without being charged (when I picked it up it was at 47%) but I have no real reason to believe this 4 month absence of charging has anything to do with my lower-than-expected (for me) numbers.
 

jerry33

(S85-3/2/13 traded in) X LR: F2611##-3/27/20
Mar 8, 2012
19,516
21,710
Texas
I've got 36K on my 2016 Model S 75 RWD. My 90% is 207 and my 100% is 231. (I've ranged charged twice in the last two weeks to see if magical BMS adjustments would occur.) I'm not sure if I should be concerned because these numbers may indicate more degradation than I expected. My car was at a body shop for 16 weeks without being charged (when I picked it up it was at 47%) but I have no real reason to believe this 4 month absence of charging has anything to do with my lower-than-expected (for me) numbers.
IMHO, ideal numbers are better for indicating battery degradation than rated miles because the ideal miles aren't messed with every couple of releases (or at least they don't seem to be). Charging to 93% or more activates the balancing circuits, but they can take quite a while to do their thing. (Doesn't matter what you charge to once they are activated, they stay activated until complete.) However, this will only make a difference if your pack was out of balance to start with.

Best practice is to notify the Service Centre so that they can look at the car and have it on record (be sure you get and keep a copy of the work they do).
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobjustbob

jskenney

Happy Member
Mar 22, 2013
85
48
Maryland
I traded in my 2015 70D last week (vin 87598), my 90% stayed at 210 miles for 2 years and 33k miles. I had only used the superchargers ~8 times, and charged it to 90% every night via the wall charger limited to 30amps.
 

GWord

Member
Aug 18, 2016
567
861
Houston, TX
Something weird happened with my P90D. My 90% has settled in at 241 for a while now (244 when new). I took the car down to 3% yesterday and this morning 90% is 246. So my magic battery now has more rated range than when new. I suspect a little wonkiness with the algorithm rather than actual capacity that high. Will be interesting to see what it settles back down to.
 

thecloud

As rhythm raced inside, the ship came alive
Nov 24, 2014
1,769
1,623
Sunnyvale, CA
P85+ 2014 with about 24k in mileage...

90% 233 (sometimes 234)
100% (265 both times i did !00%)

Feeling really good about that compared to others here....
As someone with roughly the same mileage and stats (238 at 90%, 263 at 100%) on a 2014 P85 with rev. D battery, I'm curious about something: how often do you plug your car in?

I plug in maybe twice a week, when needed. Yes, I know we've been told that "a plugged-in Tesla is a happy Tesla," but I normally don't leave the car plugged in for longer than it takes to charge. My battery shows very little degradation (when new, it was 240 at 90% and 265 at 100%), and I'm still on my original 12V battery after 3 years.

Could it be that many short charging cycles are actually not as beneficial as fewer overall cycles, and/or avoiding the low end of the battery's range? (I don't know; it's something I'm wondering based on my experience.) Maybe there's a behavioral component, or maybe some people just get luckier with their chemistry. ;)
 

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top