You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am doubting the 100kWh will ever be available
... but the actual change is very lumpy -- it doesn't come in a nice smooth line.
There have been several things embedded in software that never came to fruition. Don't wanna guess either way whether it will or won't come to pass, but being there isn't necessarily a benchmark either way.So do you think they will be stuck with 90kWh forever, or will they make a bigger jump past 100kWh? Seems very unlikely to include a P100D badge into your current software, if you aren't planing to use it.
They'll have a 100kWh or larger pack by end of next year, maybe sooner. If the Gigafactory is tooling up to produce next-generation 20700s in bulk by next July for the M3, Panasonic is already making them in Japan, at least on a pilot line. Tesla is already testing them, and knows just what they'll do. If the cells are actually less expensive on an energy per dollar basis, they'll get incorporated in MS/MX packs sooner rather than later. They'll likely come from both Japan and the Gigafactory. I suspect that a lot of M3 technology (see the thread on the M3 forum on its unique inverter) will find its way onto the larger platform vehicles. As a lot of these parts will be both better and cheaper -- Tesla will incorporate them as soon as they can. Sometime in the next 6 to 18 months, Tesla will announce a number of improvements for the MS and the MX, and a larger pack will be one of them. The real question is how big the jump will be; I suspect we'll see more than 100kWh for the largest pack at this jump, as the 20700s will likely represent a significant step. The average may be 5 percent or a little more improvement in battery capacity per year, but the actual change is very lumpy -- it doesn't come in a nice smooth line.
I think it's possible the current 75KWh pack is the 3rd generation cells which will be going into the 100 KWh packs. Tesla is probably waiting for battery production at the GF to spool up before switching the larger packs to the new cells that allow 100 KWh packs.
Really? Pretty sure the 75 cells are the same ones used in the 90 and the refreshed 60.
No. The original 70 used the same cells as in the 85
I'm pretty sure the 70's battery pack has the same cells as the 90. The two were introduced about the same time and the math works. Using the same number of cells as the first generation packs, the 2nd generation comes up with 69.6KWh and 91.99KWh.
It is possible the 75 KWh pack was created by adding some cells to the modules in the 70 pack. The 75 pack was introduced right about the same time the leak about the 100 KWh pack was came out. I ran the numbers and if the Ah of the 3rd gen batteries came up 3.9 Ah, this would work out to 77.5 KWh and 102.5 KWh pack. A 3.8 Ah cell would come out with a 75.6 KWh and 99.9 KWh pack using the same cell count as the 1st and 2nd generation packs.
Tesla has made it clear the new 60 and the 75 are the same physical pack. I made a chart in this post: Tesla Battery Generations
There are 2 triggers for my upgrade decision: AP2.0, and a 100kW+ battery. For me that means a 50-mile range increase.
@okashira has some insight on this here:
Tesla Model S 18650 Cell Test Data
I think he also did a 70 kWh tear down but I can't find the thread.