I'll take a stab at presenting a widely held view on this side of the pond.... you can believe it or not, but please do understand that many Roadster owners do not participate in TMC so you'll not necessarily get this reflected in posts here. Also many Tesla employees that I've met couldn't possibly say what they think. I appreciate it will be a little controversial for people who like the Model S and Model X :wink:
Note: let me just say at the outset that I love my Roadster and fully support Tesla (in the next two weeks alone I'm attending three charity events and heavily promoting Tesla and other electric car's).
Here's what I wish Tesla had done...
(1) 3.0 Roadster
Today we should already be driving Roadsters with the following upgrades;
300+ miles range
43kW 3 Phase AC charging
J1772 (US) and "mennekes" (ROW) charging connectors
These upgrades would have been extremely cheap and easy to deliver. This would push the boundary of what's possible in an EV much further and allow owners to participate in many more ICE competitions around the world. Imagine the PR of an annual trans-europe or trans-US event. Or full participation in
Gumball 3000!
Also think of the value to RND of those enhancements.
(2) 3.5 Roadster
Cosmetic and feature upgrades... again, cheap and easy to deliver.
(3) Roadster Race/Performance Team
Tesla should have a small team constantly developing Roadster Race/Performance upgrades that allow it to participate in events demonstrating it's technical prowess.
I'm thinking small capacity battery, ultra fast charge, high speed, anything that pushes Tesla forward in the mind of the ICE race fraternity.
Nürburgring, Le Mans, etc...
(4) next generation Super Car
I would like to have seen Tesla develop a true super car to compete squarely with the Ferrari's and Lamborghini's of this world.
This is a small market of a few hundred cars a year but it's PR reach is enormous (just like the Roadster). I would argue that for a company interested in the transition from oil then demonstrating real alternatives at the pinnacle of motoring is critical.
Lots of ideas have been discussed here on
TMC in terms of performance and other criteria for this car.
By way of a benchmark I would suggest people take a look at the
Exagon Furtive e-GT which is the closest car I know in terms of EV performance and super car build quality. Before you dismiss this car can I suggest that you sit in one? Also please remember that I could take delivery before a Model S in the UK.
I believe the Tesla super car could have been developed at much less cost than the Model S and would once again demonstrate the value and prowess of Tesla's technology.
(5) technology transfer
During all of the above I think Tesla could be selling technology to other car companies. I appreciate that the income from this might not be as great as the potential income from Model S/X. However, I would also argue that the monies being spent on development and company infrastructure would be a lot less as well.
(6) Tesla technology in an existing mass produced car
I would like to have seen an existing mule used to lower the development burden on a next generation car. IMO this would deliver a car quicker, cheaper, and with a lot less risk.
I know Tesla worked hard at this in the early days and I'm sure a deal could have been struck. Remember that the Roadster, RAV4, and others are exactly this.
You all love your 17" screens, wooden dash, and crazy doors, but IMO this is where much of the risk lies for Tesla.... they do power-trains, electronics, and batteries really, really well.... can they actually match this with the rest of the car?