TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Why are Scandinavian/Nordic countries so progressive?

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Nuclear Fusion, Aug 10, 2018.

  1. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    641
    Location:
    Your mum
    Even by Europe’s standards.
    What was it about the culture to develop this way?
     
  2. HVM

    HVM Savolainen

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    473
    Location:
    Finland
    Because they can afford it, Sweden was neutral during WWII (no need to massive rebuild) and Norway has oil. Example both Finland and Denmark are more conservative when compared to Sweden. All have (excluding Denmark in some sense) quite large natural resources and low population.
     
  3. pkodali

    pkodali Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2017
    Messages:
    812
    Location:
    Sacramento
    And all are extremely culturally homogenous
     
  4. HVM

    HVM Savolainen

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    473
    Location:
    Finland
    What, what,... Tall and blonde you say? Good thing you put "culturally" there. Other ways that would be less progressive.
     
    • Love x 1
  5. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,255
    Location:
    Maine
    Perhaps a combination of non-patriarchal family structure, climate, topography, location and population density. It helps when you aren't heavily resource-constrained, have shared challenges, look outward, and have full female participation.
     
    • Like x 1
  6. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,255
    Location:
    Maine
    One year at secondary school I was in a geography class that was taught by a Danish teacher. (She spoke perfect English, of course) She noted when introducing herself to the class that being short and black-haired she was far from the Scandinavian stereotype.
     
  7. Johan

    Johan Funds for M3 secured. Contingent on wife aproval.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    7,177
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    Serious opinion from a native Swede living in Norway: because during the entire 20th century, except for maybe the first two decades, our countries were politically steered by social democrats. Social democracy is socialism without communism, socialist ideology within a highly regulated capitalistic system. Neither any of the authoritarianism of fascism or communism, but nor the corrupt, special-interst controlled, "free market" obsessed, two-party systems of places like the US or Brittain. (Two parties in a democracy is only one party more than North Korea).
     
    • Like x 2
  8. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    641
    Location:
    Your mum
    Ha ha.
    The funniest (saddest) thing is people think China, North Korea & Stalinist Soviet Union are communist countries....because the label stated such. The N in NAZI stood for socialism....
     
  9. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,255
    Location:
    Maine
    You mixed up your acronyms. Nazi wasn't an acronym. The party was the NSDAP.
    The N in Nazi stood for Nationalists. The Sozis were the Socialists.

    NSDA kind of covered all the bases populists like to cover: Nationalism, Socialism, Democracy, Workers.

    But now we're getting terribly close to invoking Godwin's Law...
     
    • Like x 1
  10. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    641
    Location:
    Your mum
    Point being a label means nothing
     
  11. Johan

    Johan Funds for M3 secured. Contingent on wife aproval.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    7,177
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    Well, while for whatever reasons I can't say I've never seen a communist country actually being run according to actual communist ideology (as per Marx and Engels) I have seen countries run according to social democratic ideology and it works very well, thank you very much.
     
  12. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    641
    Location:
    Your mum
    Technically, communism means an absence of government
     
    • Like x 1
  13. nwdiver

    nwdiver Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Messages:
    4,219
    Location:
    United States
    The Nordic Countries decided to value equality. Other western countries like the US have yet to mature that far....
     
    • Like x 3
  14. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    641
    Location:
    Your mum
    Yeah, income inequality is becoming a greater & greater issue in so many western democracies.
    It frustrates me intensely how so many poorer people vote against their own economic interest
     
  15. Lasairfion

    Lasairfion Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    247
    Location:
    UK
    I'm not sure how they arrived at such a progressive mindset culturally when you consider how violent their history has been (vikings!). Perhaps it's one of those times where the swing goes completely opposite.

    As to how they afford it, that's down to 2 things.

    One: their taxes are very, very high.

    The UK's tax rates are 47% Income, 20% Value added, 19% Corporate.
    Norway's tax rates are 53.5% Income, 25% Value added, 23% Corporate
    Denmark's tax rates are 55.56% Income, 25% Value added, 22% Corporate
    Finland's tax rates are 67% Income, 24% Value added, 20% Corporate.
    Sweden's tax rates are 67% Income, 25% Value added, 22% Corporate.

    Two: like many European countries they rely on America to pay for their defence. The UK is one of the few countries that meets NATOs 2% spending requirement for defence.

    "Most EU countries still miss NATO’s defence spending guideline, even with an overall boost in expenditures, according to the alliance’s annual report* for 2017, released Thursday. Of NATO’s EU allies, only Greece, Estonia and the U.K. hit the target of spending 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defence." -- Most EU countries still miss NATO spending target

    For example if the UK were spending the same levels as say Norway on defence, we'd be saving £11,239,450,000 a year.
    If the UK were spending the same levels as Sweden on defence, we'd be saving £20,704,250,000 a year.

    If we were spending that sort of money (increased tax rates and decreased defence spending) on citizen healthcare, education programmes and the like, then we could afford to be at such a progressive level as you see in Sweden, Norway etc.

    With America's recent reticence to continue paying for someone else and pushing for increased defence spending, I can see many of these progressive countries finding it increasingly difficult to maintain such high levels of public fund outlay.

    [* Page 109]
     
    • Like x 1
  16. ShockOnT

    ShockOnT ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Messages:
    2,316
    Location:
    Sydney
    Totally incorrect.
    Labels are like brands, like flags, like uniforms. They are profoundly important to a group’s self-image and values and actions.
     
  17. ShockOnT

    ShockOnT ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Messages:
    2,316
    Location:
    Sydney
    They aren’t progressive because they have high taxes, they have high taxes because they are progressive.

    Low taxes are the result of an “every man for himself” mindset.

    Progressive countries have a “no man left behind” mindset, where everyone chips in for universal health care, a welfare safety net and so on.

    Both have their problems and advantages.
     
  18. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    641
    Location:
    Your mum
    *insert long bow drawn gif here*

    America is an irrational, fear &war mongering nation (eg Vietnam, Iraq). Trillions would be saved if this attitude changed, including the costs of refugees from invaded nations.
    One of the most nauseating things about American culture, even on more progressive shows like Bill Maher, is the ongoing drivel about ‘patriotism’. “Are you a patriot”, “he’s a patriot” & on & on & on & on.
    Nauseating.
     
  19. Nuclear Fusion

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    641
    Location:
    Your mum
    That wasn’t the point
     
  20. ShockOnT

    ShockOnT ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Messages:
    2,316
    Location:
    Sydney
    I think the reason a lot of NATO countries have trouble spending the 2% is that they’re not active in any war zones.
    It’s easier for Australia or the UK to spend, because we are actually firing shells and crashing helicopters.
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC