Summing it up:
PPF camp: car remains looking new for years. OVD type…every kick or chip causes high B pressure lol, provides comfort especially in northern climates where ice and snow are ‘brushed off’ and cause swirls, peace of mind, perhaps longer term ownership 5yrs+ so amortized cost over time, enjoy seeing a new blemish free car every day.
Non PPF camp: waste of $, cost to repair similar, won’t see a return, cars are not meant to look new forever, it’s not a Ferrari, spend on more practical things. Ie. Upgraded tires, suspension, boost
What’s intriguing is I see benefits on both sides. I wrapped a new model S in 2018 partial but included the rear bumper. 2 weeks in, a car rear ended me lightly but requiring a replacement bumper. Ppf: zero safety and cost me to replace it as insurance wouldn’t cover that part.
Fast forward 2 yrs…driving on highway, stone chip hit the front hood and caused a 1cm rip/tear in the ppf but didn’t touch the paint. I had the ppf replaced for $350, looked showroom and it was still oem original paint.
Ppf: prevented a full hood repait.
I’ll say overall ANY upgrade one does to a car will never see more then 50% return…if that. Used car buyers will pay what they pay regardless of ppf, boost, tires etc and will always see these items as bundled with the car. Ie. Negotiated in the final $
I can agree non- ppf for those who simply don’t care, happy to drive and go and come what may. Works for them
And I see that logic as well…I just know myself lol.
For me ppf is about always keeping the shoe shined. And one day hopefully a 5 yr old used car that looks brand new could simply sell faster and perhaps for a tad bit more
…but I’m the end I wake up each day with a brand new looking car. There is an intrinsic benefit to that