I see why people recommend low regen now. Most of my driving has been on the local roads with snow and ice covered stuff, so fastest I'm going is maybe 30-35.
I was out on the highway today and there's some icy spots and every time I pulled off on the accelerator when regen kicked in I felt the back slide. It wasn't horrible, but it also wasn't that icy. And I definitely wasn't quite expecting it.
It's refreshing to see someone realize this. I also noticed about a month ago when it was really nasty that even the Low setting isn't good enough when going 50km/h (30mph) if it's really really icy. Back end will still kick out and when it's that icy, the process of getting traction back is not a great time.
I now wish we had an option for no regen. Fiddling with getting between drive and neutral is not a solution, especially with how that works in a Model 3.
Here's a crazy idea... maybe Tesla needs to hire some coders with a little more experience with cars. It's 2020 and Tesla has had cars on the roads for years and has collected thousands of hours of data and they still can't figure out how to correctly manage traction control, anti-lock braking, automatic emergency braking, and regenerative braking — at the same time — when it's raining, snowing or cold enough to freeze? An end user had to suggest that maybe they could better handle the bluetooth handoff from phone to car by using the seat sensor? There are plenty of sensors in the car that can help the software figure out if it's wet or dry, hot or cold, if the tires have traction or not and they can't use all that data to somehow figure out how to properly manage regenerative braking without me having to go into a menu ahead of my drive and 'reducing' it (along with switching to 'chill')?
My wife drives it daily in Chicago an I have to listen to her complaints about how her 2016 BMW 3 series had much better handling and didn't fishtail in the snow and ice like this 2019 AWD M3 does. At first, I thought she was just getting used to it as a different car but then I drove it a bit on the weekend when we had some snow and noticed the same. Having to go find some arcane setting in a buried menu because the car can't figure this out on its own makes the car seem substantially less 'premium' (I'm not going to go into the center console, or the lack of automatic trunk/frunk or the interior lights) than it should be for the price.
Likewise, after seeing how all the 'autopilot' and 'cruise control' features are disabled anytime it's less than ideal conditions really makes me wonder how I'm going to get my $6,000 worth of 'full self-driving' if it starts to rain or snow? I'm guessing people in the Seattle area are completely out of luck.
I really like my Tesla but these are the kind of things that are going to really kill Tesla if they can't fix these things before another major manufacturer with a lot of car-making history goes full-on EV because it's the simple everyday things that drive the market, build customer loyalty and spread via word of mouth.
To be utterly fair, the way anti-lock braking works actually depends on that wheel locking up first. Same with traction control systems, they
detect slip,
not prevent it. These systems intervene, not prevent. The car cannot tell if the road is wet, oily, icy, cold, hot, pavement, gravel, snow, metal grating, etc. And if it
can via the cameras, I doubt it's reliable identification at this stage. And even if it was reliable, it has no way of knowing what type and
condition of tires you have equipped. And keep in mind road conditions can change extremely fast, e.g. bridges or frozen puddles on an otherwise dry road.
Design and decision prevents. For AWD models, a more front-motor bias (snow mode?) would help most drivers. For all models, using chill mode and low regen helps to a degree. That rear motor will ramp up far too easily otherwise at low speeds despite all efforts to apply absolutely minimal acceleration.