Yggdrasill
Active Member
Here's one test Dyrt og livsfarlig å kjøre med vinterdekk - Dekk og Utstyr (Norwegian)Do you have a citation for that? because a frequent condition that winter tires have to deal with is a thin layer of water on top of ice, so generally I would expect them to do well in this situation (and the study I referred to earlier did not note that as a downside)
They used four different sets of tires; new summer tires with 8.1 mm thread depth, used summer tires with 3-3.7 mm thread depth, new winter tires with 8.6 mm thread depth and used winter tires with 5-6.4 mm thread depth.
The aquaplaning results when driving straight through standing water:
New summer tires: 82.6 km/h
Used summer tires: 69 km/h
New winter tires: 67 km/h
Used winter tires: 66 km/h
They also tested the tires when driving through standing water when cornering, and the new winter tires could handle only half the lateral force of the summer tires, with the used winter tires being even worse. (The soft rubber leads to the threads closing up when subjected to the lateral forces, and traps the water under the tires.)
And in the braking test from 80 km/h on wet asphalt, the new summer tires needed 37.7 meters and the used summer tires needed 39.7 meters, while the winter tires needed 50 meters. That means that when the cars with summer tires have come to a complete stop, the cars with winter tires are still going at about 40 km/h.
- - - Updated - - -
Of course, it's important to differentiate between different kinds of winter tires. Some winter tires are intended for city-use where you have a lot of wet roads and not a whole lot of snow and ice. Other winter tires (e.g. Nokian) are intended for snow and ice. The former will naturally perform better on wet roads while the latter will most likely not be as good on wet roads. The testing performed above is done on nordic winter tires, designed for snow and ice.