PhilDavid
Active Member
Since Tesla is obviously losing their a$$ on CPO, I have an idea.....
If Tesla isn’t going to rehab/recondition CPO to any degree beyond road worthiness, why not post high res photos of the car as-is leaving any reconditioning/cleaning/fixing to the buyer. The photos would have to at least be standardized with respect to lighting, angle, sufficient number, etc. At least this is up front and honest. With this system, perhaps instead of the reverse auction sales system (where Tesla drops the price a little each night until someone bites) they start them off at a bare minimum price and have a 10 day “bidding” period where highest bidder takes the car as is.
If the cars a little rough and someone’s willing to put some elbow grease in, you pay a little less. Don’t mind those rock chips and curb rash, save $4-5k over the pristine one... If you want that low mile cream puff, get ready to open your wallet!!!!
I know your mean well but oh lordy yikes! What you propose would make the current program even worse.
It is bad enough that they are selling damaged cars without refurbishing them but under what you propose, customers are expected to fall allover themselves bidding for the cars too? It's like who wants to bid more for the car that had the sh!t beaten out of it?! Why not instead price cars in a rational way so that they sell?
Also I hope you realize that what you call "cream puffs" are basically EVERY SINGLE car that is offered as a CPO car by a car dealer. They are all refurbished to look decent and vehicles that are in poor condition are auctioned off because it is considered unreasonable by car dealers to sell CPO cars in poor condition.
How did Tesla end up in a position where you have to look to a car dealer to see how to treat customers in a reasonable manner? Isn't their whole premise supposed to be that car dealers are horrible and that they take better care of customers?
We are in the market for a second Tesla and expect it to look as pristine as our almost 3 year old car and will reject any cars that are damaged. We've taken great care of our car and would like to buy a car that is similarly in good condition.
I feel they should bring back the CPO program and charge whatever they need to refurbish the cars to be respectable and add that cost to the price of the car. They can then sell badly beaten up cars either as "used cars" or auction them off. This way customers know what they are buying. Is that really unreasonable?
I do agree with you completely about offering high resolution photos in good lighting that clearly show the state of the car. Photos of some of the CPO vehicles we were interested in look like they came from a digital came made in the 90s.
Last edited: