Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by juju, Apr 16, 2018.
I can't decide.
Only if there are additional empty spots.
He paid for what he took. I have no issue at all.
Given the clearance (or lack thereof) from the lines to the cars on both sides:
I'm inclined to agree with this. If the parking lot is full and spots are limited, this is a pretty jerk move. However, if there's plenty of other spots available and you're willing to pay for two, I don't have an issue.
Maybe I should've asked...would YOU ever do this?
It doesn't look like the individual had much choice.
In fact he/she found a work around for the between a rock and a hard place problem.
I imagine they were in a hurry, and had to do something.
Private lot, no problem. Public lot, no.
Humm. I think I’m ok with that solution.
Look's like the jerk's on each side should have paid for taking 2 parking spaces.
He paid for it. So I don't think it should be a big deal.
Sounds good to me! So I can park for free my two cars on each side!
When you buy 2 seats on an airplane, you get to use those two seats and nobody else. When you charter the whole damn plane,nobody else gets on.
This guy bought to tickets to any two spots on that parking lot and he should be able to use those two spots in any way he sees fit as long as it doesn't violate some law or regulation. Would it be wrong for him to put a bed on that exact same spot? I don't think so, as long as he clears the spot before the tickets expire.
Do you think I am wrong? Show me the law or regulation that says you can't rent two spaces for one car.
It's fine with me.