TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Zuma Satellite Reportedly Destroyed Following 1/8/18 Launch By SpaceX

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by TMC Staff, Jan 9, 2018.

Tags:
  1. TMC Staff

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,182
    A satellite launched Sunday by SpaceX as part of a classified government mission reportedly failed to reach orbit and was destroyed, according the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. The satellite, named Zuma, was built by Northrop Grumman Corp. and reportedly cost billions. Officials told Reuters that the satellite is a total loss, likely to have...
    READ FULL ARTICLE
     
  2. Chaserr

    Chaserr Hyperactive Hyperdrive

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2017
    Messages:
    2,654
    Location:
    Logan
    This isn't the first spy satellite that was "destroyed" after successful deployment. It's pretty much the standard lie; satellite watchers do their best to track a new satellite's orbit and this is just the way these birds are disavowed publicly.
     
    • Informative x 3
    • Like x 3
    • Disagree x 1
  3. Ticobird

    Ticobird Lovin the Tesla Life

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    351
    Location:
    Hazel Green, AL
    That sounds like a reasonable explanation.
     
  4. arnis

    arnis Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2015
    Messages:
    919
    Location:
    Estonia
    It isn't credible that a satellite just disappears. SpaceX has (or had) video about deployment.
    With all the data how fast it was moving, trajectory, etc.
    We can track space debris that is very tiny. It's not credible that we can't track a huge satellite.

    If you want to say "it is classified" then say it. No need to lie "it was destroyed and we don't know anything". It's just funny:D
     
  5. JonathanD

    JonathanD Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    432
    Location:
    OC, CA
    • Informative x 3
    • Like x 1
  6. trace

    trace Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2017
    Messages:
    147
    Location:
    Michigan
    I suppose we will see if SpaceX delays their next 52 missions to "review" data.
     
    • Like x 2
  7. SO16

    SO16 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2016
    Messages:
    2,630
    Location:
    MI

    So far they are not adjusting their schedule. Per Gwen Shotwell: “Since the data reviewed so far indicates that no design, operational or other changes are needed, we do not anticipate any impact on the upcoming launch schedule.”
     
    • Informative x 1
  8. Olds442

    Olds442 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2017
    Messages:
    776
    Location:
    Usually in the past.
    of course it was a "failure". nothing to see here. ;)
     
    • Like x 1
  9. AnxietyRanger

    AnxietyRanger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    9,408
    Location:
    EU
    SpaceX checked the logs and of course found that the crash was the driver's fault... Oh, sorry, wrong company! ;)
     
    • Funny x 10
    • Informative x 1
    • Like x 1
  10. Petra

    Petra Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2015
    Messages:
    813
    Location:
    Palmdale, CA USA
    From what I've been reading, the customer provided their own payload adapter which means that a failure to separate wouldn't really be SpaceX's fault.
     
    • Informative x 1
  11. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    So even TMC is posting misinformation against one of Elon's companies?
    Statement From Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO of SpaceX on Zuma Launch

    The following statement is from Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO of SpaceX:

    “For clarity: after review of all data to date, Falcon 9 did everything correctly on Sunday night. If we or others find otherwise based on further review, we will report it immediately. Information published that is contrary to this statement is categorically false. Due to the classified nature of the payload, no further comment is possible.

    “Since the data reviewed so far indicates that no design, operational or other changes are needed, we do not anticipate any impact on the upcoming launch schedule. Falcon Heavy has been rolled out to launchpad LC-39A for a static fire later this week, to be followed shortly thereafter by its maiden flight. We are also preparing for an F9 launch for SES and the Luxembourg Government from SLC-40 in three weeks.”
     
    • Informative x 2
    • Helpful x 1
  12. GoTslaGo

    GoTslaGo Learning Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    3,063
    Location:
    US
    More info from Teslarati:

    SpaceX President breaks silence on rumored Zuma mission failure

    Specifically:

    Twitter

    To quote the Teslarati article:

    Further complicating claims that the satellite failed to separate, Northrop Grumman had explicitly required that they be allowed to furnish the payload adapter for the Zuma mission, meaning that SpaceX was not responsible for connecting the satellite to the second stage, nor separating it after launch. In other words, if the satellite failed to separate, it would appear that SpaceX could not be easily blamed. However, regardless of these facts, SpaceX’s COO Gwynne Shotwell issued a thoroughly blunt and explicit statement earlier this morning, January 9. In no simple terms, she pegged rumors implicating SpaceX as the source of failure as “categorically false.”

    End quote.
     
    • Like x 2
    • Informative x 1
  13. Bobfitz1

    Bobfitz1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    Ludlow, Vt
    Have to love Gwynne's way of drawing a line in the sand and then poking her stick in eye of the aerospace old school!
     
    • Like x 1
  14. AnxietyRanger

    AnxietyRanger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    9,408
    Location:
    EU
    Is it just me or are these last three sentences at odds with each other...?

    1) Falcon did right.

    2) They or others will tell us if they find otherwise.

    3) But any info contrary to "Falcon is right" is categorically false.

    4) And due the classified nature, no further comment is possible anyway.

    So, basically, Falcon did right. Right?
     
    • Informative x 1
    • Funny x 1
  15. Yuri_G

    Yuri_G Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    No, she's stating that both stages performed nominally on SpaceX's side. Any questions about the payload adapter and Northrop Grumman's satellite cannot be fielded by SpaceX given the classified nature of the satellite. Not difficult to understand.
     
    • Like x 2
  16. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Gwynne is essentially saying that SpaceX did exactly what they were paid to do. Which includes releasing the payload in the proper orbit. Since the details are classified, she cannot say that the articles that say the payload went down with the second stage are false. That was misinformation created by someone for their own agenda that has nothing to do with what actually happened. There is evidence that shows everything went as planned. SpaceX is saying everything went as planned. The payload has likely failed but there is no official confirmation that is even true.

    The Teslarati article in post #12 does a fantastic job of collating all known information and debunks the false information brought out in one or two articles then copied by twenty or so others using those articles as reference.
     
    • Like x 2
  17. davecolene0606

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2013
    Messages:
    839
    Location:
    Fort Pierce, FL
    Then they attack you...

    Then you win.

    Fire Away:cool:
     
  18. AnxietyRanger

    AnxietyRanger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    9,408
    Location:
    EU
    @Yuri @Grendal Oh I do get the basis on which SpaceX made the claim that their part worked. It is definitely plausible too. That wasn't at question.

    I repeat my question: Read these sentences again, doesn't anyone else see them as contradicting each other?

    "Falcon 9 did everything correctly on Sunday night. If we or others find otherwise based on further review, we will report it immediately. Information published that is contrary to this statement is categorically false. Due to the classified nature of the payload, no further comment is possible."

    First they say that if this info is wrong, they'll report it.

    Then they say any info contrary to this claim is categorically false.

    Then they basically say they can't report anything further anyway.

    Just was curious from a comms success perspective. It seemed to me unsuccessful choice of words.
     
    • Like x 1
  19. skitown

    skitown Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    869
    Location:
    Central Idaho, U.S.A, Earth
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny x 2
    • Like x 1
  20. AnxietyRanger

    AnxietyRanger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    9,408
    Location:
    EU
    I guess my minute interests in comms nuances aren't shared by the teslarati here. :)
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC