Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Recent content by ran349

  1. R

    Firsthand experience with out-of-warranty battery replacement cost?

    How much degradation does your battery have since you had the new one put in?
  2. R

    SMT Results

    Yes, it should be lifetime. You also have a very small amount of DC charging 31.9 kwh.
  3. R

    SMT Results

    No, your actual capacity of 55.3 kWh includes the buffer. So If your conversion constant is 286 Wh/mi ( it could be 285 or 287 also), then your degradation would be 55.3/.286/208 = about 7%. That equals what you calculated and is excellent for your battery at this stage. It looks like your...
  4. R

    SMT Results

    Thanks for sharing the data. Also, it's good that you showed the ALL tab since it shows the complete data set. Your battery certainly appears to be in good shape, at least capacity wise. You have 55.3 kWh nominal full pack which represents the total battery capacity. As a comparison, my...
  5. R

    Are you still on the original battery pack with your 2012-2015 Model S?

    Just screen shot pictures will work for most things you need to understand.
  6. R

    Are you still on the original battery pack with your 2012-2015 Model S?

    Please post your data and there are plenty of people here glad to help you interpret it!
  7. R

    Are you still on the original battery pack with your 2012-2015 Model S?

    What is your llifetime Wh/mi? I am at 292 Wh/mi lifetime after about 170k total miles. If I am driving moderate speed on the freeway, I get around 265 Wh/mi.
  8. R

    Are you still on the original battery pack with your 2012-2015 Model S?

    What version of SMT are you using? I didn't know you could get the CAC values from the older cars. Where did you get the parts (cable and adapter for SMT)?
  9. R

    Are you still on the original battery pack with your 2012-2015 Model S?

    Your numbers look pretty accurate. I would expect SMT to match closely to the TeslaMate values you have shown, although what TeslaMate calls usable is not really usable, unless you include the 4.0 kWh buffer. In SMT, your 61.5 kWh equivalent value is called Nominal Full Pack. My car is the...
  10. R

    Some new data from research on Tesla model 3 cells

    There is another easy way to calculate the constant for your car without requiring use of SMT. If you have an app like Tessie or possibly TeslaMate, they usually keep track of your charge data. If you have a pretty good history of your charge data from the app all you need to do is take total...
  11. R

    Clarity around CAC imbalances, voltage imbalances, bad bricks, and battery warranty - 2015 90D

    I remember when Jason posted these numbers and there wasn't much SMT data at that time to compare to. But I was suspicious of those numbers from Jason because they didn't match well with what I saw from my own car that had a 4.0 kWh buffer when I bought it new in 2015, and also had a full...
  12. R

    Dash showing more range than when new

    The battery does look good as far as degradation goes. But it still leaves the question of how the display shows 385 miles at 100%, when the new rated range number was 370 miles, unless it really is a long range +. I agree it is a little bit of a red flag that the owner got rid of the car after...
  13. R

    Dash showing more range than when new

    You're looking at the right place, so it doesn't appear to have the option to change the display to ideal miles. Did you find out any more information? You can use the energy screen method to calculate the approximate capacity of the battery to help determine degradation if you are still...
  14. R

    Some new data from research on Tesla model 3 cells

    My car (70D) I bought new in 2015, and it always had a 4.0 kWh buffer. I am not sure where the idea of a lower buffer of 2.4 came from but I think maybe the 60 kWh cars did have a smaller buffer. But the 70 cars always had 4.0 kWh. Is your battery the original? That is very little...