Actually they do that from time to time but it's to improve the algorithm.Haha. To rehash a point from that thread, I believe Tesla would get into a lot of EPA trouble if they attempted to claim higher economy via a software update ;-)
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually they do that from time to time but it's to improve the algorithm.Haha. To rehash a point from that thread, I believe Tesla would get into a lot of EPA trouble if they attempted to claim higher economy via a software update ;-)
What speed are you going roughly to achieve such great economy? I have managed to avg 297 kW per mi over 66k miles in my 2014 p85 with cyclone wheels.. I thought I was doing good!
He only drives downhill...
I knew you guys wouldn't believe me, so I snapped a picture this morning on my drive in:
View attachment 184174
Tesla winds was showing nominal wind/elevation. This is driving down a flat section of 101 on the Olympic Peninsula on my way to work.
It appears my efficiency is unchanged since the update.
Cool, but I can drive from my the place I ski at 87 miles away and get home with an average use in the 50s.
How about a picture of projected range vs actual range on your energy page while using nav for your trip? The energy page will project rated and then adjust it for elevation. If what you say is true, then you should have a huge diverging line between the original projected and what you get.
I always beat the original projection. I'll snap a picture of it on my way home tonight or tomorrow morning.
We have a thread like this every time summer comes.
We have a thread the opposite of this every winter.
I'm not saying the firmware didn't change efficiency in some way, just offering data to consider. Shall we start a "did they change regen" thread also?