Daniel in SD
(supervised)
Steer by wire software had a nasty bug. Bad sensor input would steer the plane into the ground.You’ll have to elaborate if you’re trying to bait anyone.
Door plugs? no bolts? use your words.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Steer by wire software had a nasty bug. Bad sensor input would steer the plane into the ground.You’ll have to elaborate if you’re trying to bait anyone.
Door plugs? no bolts? use your words.
How long did it take you to get over your fear of suffocation before you accepted a car with power windows?I'm curious as to what details we have on the Cybertruck steer by wire system.
Do you all trust steer by wire?
I don't trust steer by wire systems. Electrical systems can die suddenly, and I don't want my steering dying suddenly while I'm driving. In my 8 years driving Teslas, I have had multiple different electrical system failures, but no physical failures, and that experience generally met my expectations. Most notably on this discussion, I have actually had the power steering system fail while driving my Model S, but I could still steer the vehicle safely to a stop with some extra effort because the physical connection was still there. This power steering failure is not the origin of my concern; my concerns about steer by wire pre-date that incident; it was therefore instead validation of my concerns.
Now, I can be sold on steer by wire, but I would need details on how it has been made safe, through redundancy and/or over engineering. But when it comes to Tesla, their mantra is no unnecessary excess and the best part is no part. I therefore expect they would have been resistant to adding any redundancy or safety margin on the steer by wire system.
Do we have any details on how the Cybertruck steer by wire system works? Have they done any work with it to make it resistant to electrical failures? What do we know about that so far?
Say what you will about Tesla's iterative approach to cost reduction, but they tend to go in the opposite direction when launching a new (unproven)technology - they go a little overkill in the engineering aspects to bolster confidence in the beginning. I would probably be a little more comfortable with a 1st gen version of this vs. future generations in which _may_ trade cost for safety.The problem with Cybertruck is that Tesla's steer by wire is not proven technology yet, and I wouldn't trust Tesla not to cut corners in the name of efficiency. I'm not sure their focus on passenger safety extends to their electrical system designs. Tesla needs to do more to convince me that their steer by wire systems will be reliable, or at least more reliable than my Tesla power steering that has failed on me in the past.
It's not terribly complicated.I don't think you get it. I don't care about the 99,999 other people. I'm not even suggesting that Tesla steer by wiring isn't safe. Just that I don't currently trust it myself, and would like to be convinced that it is safe. To that end, does anyone have a reference or information on their design? That's what I'm asking. Also, I was just curious if others had similar concerns.
Steer by wire software had a nasty bug. Bad sensor input would steer the plane into the ground.
Considering it’s one of the main things that needed to happen for the robotaxi, it’ll be fine. I get it, the world is scared of all new things, buuuuut… were some of y’all low vin S owners scared? ~5k vin p85 owner here, can’t say I ever was.View attachment 1008726
Just in case we need to recycle this meme for the cybertruck.
Love that we are getting steer by wire. I will not be in the first batch of testers, but I'll be very upset if tesla doesn't nail the landing. I've been waiting for steer by wire to take off for over a decade now. Don't duck it up with your lumbar removing, radar neutering, uss ghosting cost cutting fetish Elon.
Don't. Duck. It. Up.
FSD computers haven’t been redundant for a very long time.I share the OP's concerns about SBW. However, I do not think Tesla has or will cut corners here. At significant cost, they put in redundant FSD computers into their vehicles after-all and a SBW failure is an even more life-threatening event (at least for now since you are required to keep your hands on the wheel for FSD). There is no way the driver can override a SBW failure and such a failure would likely be the end of Cybertruck, ..maybe even Tesla so I am confident that multiple redundancies are in place. Tesla isn't suicidal.
You talk about something you know nothing about.Tesla's steer by wire is not proven technology yet,
A airplane is NOT the same as a vehicle. I always crack up with people don’t understand it and try to compare the two.when was the last time you flew in an airplane? ridden a train?
This has been discussed at length. many redundancies are in place here and in fact everyone will be using it when the robotaxi comes out.
True. But they started that way when Elon believed they would be able to remove the steering wheel "next year." Now that it is clear that true FSD is not coming any time soon, there will always be an attentive driver required so no need for the [additional] redundancy. So making better use of the compute power makes sense. A SBW fault, OTOH, is just as deadly as true FSD with no active driver so it will always require redundancy. Tesla engineers are some of the best - there is no way they are not going to have multiple redundancies and fault tolerance strategies. It will be interesting to see what happens if FSD is ever delivered - they will have to add the computer redundancy back in.FSD computers haven’t been redundant for a very long time.
Didn’t the smoking tire/ Jason drama episode heavily hash and rehash how redundant the system is?True. But they started that way when Elon believed they would be able to remove the steering wheel "next year." Now that it is clear that true FSD is not coming any time soon, there will always be an attentive driver required so no need for the [additional] redundancy. So making better use of the compute power makes sense. A SBW fault, OTOH, is just as deadly as true FSD with no active driver so it will always require redundancy. Tesla engineers are some of the best - there is no way they are not going to have multiple redundancies and fault tolerance strategies. It will be interesting to see what happens if FSD is ever delivered - they will have to add the computer redundancy back in.
Steering failure in a customer vehicle this year. What’s the over/under?Didn’t the smoking tire/ Jason drama episode heavily hash and rehash how redundant the system is?
Wasn’t it said that it’s triple redundant?
The horse is dead on this one, we should kick it
That’s the only reason to do steer by wire in the first place!I'm more concerned regarding the lack of consistency and changing steering response. I'd have to live with it for a while to determine if that's an issue.
Yes, I understand that. It's fine for tight city driving where that articulation is important, like in a local delivery van, or rock crawling on a trail. The same tech has been used on large military transport vehicles for a while now for the same reason, so it's not new. I'm more concerned about the input feel and response at highway speeds, and when a high stress maneuver is required at speed. Like I said, I'd have to put it through the paces.That’s the only reason to do steer by wire in the first place!
A variable steering ratio is a stupid idea. It's not safe - at different speeds, the same steering input causes different reactions. Or just imagine taking an exit from the highway and slowing down at the same time - you are on the circle curve, you keep the steering wheel at a certain angle but the car on its own turns wheels inside the turn causing an oversteer. I drove many cars with this steering system and it was always noticeable and not comfortable.Yes, I understand that. It's fine for tight city driving where that articulation is important, like in a local delivery van, or rock crawling on a trail. The same tech has been used on large military transport vehicles for a while now for the same reason, so it's not new. I'm more concerned about the input feel and response at highway speeds, and when a high stress maneuver is required at speed. Like I said, I'd have to put it through the paces.