Yes, which makes the story-telling more scathing, but, after some Google research, doesn't change the core "situation". It's also not the first time there's been grumblings about the company Fisker used to raise funds.
Back in October: Fisker investors file lawsuit over possible preferred stock scam
Just now: O.C. hybrid car maker sued for fraud - OC Watchdog : The Orange County Register
Guy in the second article is identified as Daniel Wray and is spurred by a letter he received in January, while the first seems to be about a group of investors down in Florida, and naturally happened before the letter.
Couple that with the DOE situation, and, political slant aside, one has to wonder...
Back in October: Fisker investors file lawsuit over possible preferred stock scam
Patient purchasers are finally taking delivery of the first Karmas to roll off the line, but not everyone is receiving everything they expected. A group of Florida investors put up $4.5 million for a stake in the plug-in hybrid company, and now has nothing to show for it.
Just now: O.C. hybrid car maker sued for fraud - OC Watchdog : The Orange County Register
Wray alleges that on Jan. 18 Fisker sent him a letter saying that “due to Fisker’s urgent need for equity capital, the financing now contains a ‘pay to play’ provision.” Bottom line: Fisker wanted him to invest an additional $83,922.32 by Jan. 27.
If he didn’t pay, the letter allegedly warned, Wray would lose rights he got when he first purchased the stock, including a discounted price if the company goes public, protection against dilution of his shares by later purchasers and preference in a bankruptcy.
Guy in the second article is identified as Daniel Wray and is spurred by a letter he received in January, while the first seems to be about a group of investors down in Florida, and naturally happened before the letter.
Couple that with the DOE situation, and, political slant aside, one has to wonder...