The base model starts at $101,395, does 0-60 in 4.5 seconds, and there's no range estimate for it. A base Model S Plaid starts at $89,990, does 0-60 in 2.2 seconds without rollout, and has an EPA range estimate of 359 miles. So the Model S is $11k less for substantially better performance and more standard features by far.
Or you could step up a notch to the Taycan 4S for $120,495 that does 0-60 in 3.5 seconds. Add in 21" summer wheels and tires for another $4,680, ventilated front seats for $850, power seats with memory for $1,510, Torque vectoring Plus for $1,500, Active ride for $7,140, ceramic composite brakes for $9,980, active cruise control and lane keeping with the required sport chrono for $4,050, ionizer for $460, and Burmester sound system for $7,000, for a total of $157,665. This will get you a Taycan fairly comparably equipped to a Model S Plaid with Track Package that would cost $109,990. Of course, it will still be much slower pretty much everywhere due to substantially less power and less grip from regular summer tires versus 'R' type tires.
Even the top of the line Taycan Turbo S would require a number of options to be comparably equipped to a Model S with Plaid Package. The price starts at $210,995, but then you have to add in Performance summer tires for $630, ventilated front seats for $850, active ride for $7,140, ceramic composite brakes for $900, ACC and lane keeping for $2,750, ionizer for $460, and Burmester sound system for $5,810, which brings the total to $229,535. My expectation is that a Model S Plaid with Track Package would still be faster than this car around a track or at the dragstrip, but you're paying more than twice as much for it.
How much more for a Taycan Turbo GT that can actually beat the Model S Plaid with Track Package? My guess is $40k, call it $270k total, give or take a few thousand. Of course, that's if they even offer the GT package/variant in the U.S.
From everything I've been hearing about the new Taycan, it sounds impressive, but it obviously comes at a price.