You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was playing games on his phone while driving. And then he died.
As ever it comes down to deficiencies in the driver attention monitoring. Hand on the wheel detection is simply inadequate, and that goes for all other manufacturers using it.
I see that Cadillac, Nissan and Lexus have all gone for a camera system and also hands-free.
It does this to this day, or it did that and the bug was eventually fixed? Or you haven't tested recently?There is an interesction like this in Austin. On Autopilot drive west on US Highway 71 from I-35 to the 360 Capitol of Tx Highway exit where the right two lanes split off to Hwy 360. Halfway along the route FSD will disengage and Autopilot takes over and at the above mentioned exit it will run you head-on in to the concrete lane divider if you don't disengage. I nearly crashed the first time I experienced this, now I manually drive that exit.
As ever it comes down to deficiencies in the driver attention monitoring. Hand on the wheel detection is simply inadequate, and that goes for all other manufacturers using it.
I see that Cadillac, Nissan and Lexus have all gone for a camera system and also hands-free.
A bit more kindness is appropriate here. Accidents happen in vehicles of all kinds. People die. It’s tragic. Nobody is perfect ( look in the mirror...) and automation can help but not fully prevent tragedies. Assigning 100% blame is too simplistic. It’s just sad.
On March 23, 2018, a glitch in Tesla's Autopilot technology contributed to the death of Walter Huang in Mountain View, California. As Huang's Model X approached a left exit on US Highway 101, the software apparently got the lane lines mixed up. The car steered to the left, putting itself in the space between the diverging lanes. Seconds later, it crashed into a concrete lane divider at 70 miles per hour. Huang was taken to the hospital but died soon afterward."
two days ago, same thingIt does this to this day, or it did that and the bug was eventually fixed? Or you haven't tested recently?
My supposition:
The Tesla did not drift on its own into the gore.
The Tesla was following a vehicle that did a late lane change through the worn lane lines of the gore point. At 4 seconds before impact, the Tesla was tracking the intact lane lines of the gore point and no longer following a vehicle, so it then accelerated to its set cruise speed.
The article also notes another fatal crash at that location in 2015, again with a not reset arrestor.
Exactly. Bad luck to be following a person who did a very late lane change. Then lack of chevrons and really badly painted lines was the next problem. Then finally no crash barrier. His autopilot as built would probably never handle that situation properly. Hopefully the new AP would do object recognition and at least stop if it ended up barreling towards a crash barrier.
Nope, problem is the driver didn’t pay attention. His game was more important.
This particular lane split happens at 1/8 of a mile before the concrete barrier. You have to purposely try to hit it, not pay attention or violate all traffic rules to hit it.Hopefully you weren't "trolling" and trying to bait someone (like me) into an endless debate just for the sake of argument.
When I see people make statements like that it seems naive to me.
Sure, we can't expect society to protect everyone all the time from every possible hazard, but I think we have done the right thing to expect reasonable amounts of safety precautions for the roadways.
Are you someone that is upset that you had to pay extra for seat belts and air bags in your car, because you are "such a great attentive driver" that you would never get in a crash?
Even the best driver in the world could run into a dividing wall in a gore area if something unforeseen, outside of their control, were to happen.
Even if they were paying close attention and looking right at that hazard they could (for instance) blow a tire, break a suspension component, or have a car in the lane beside them turn into them and push them into the barrier.
It just seems prudent to me to have properly functioning "crash cushion" devices in sections of high speed freeways that look basically like this:
View attachment 511849
A bit more kindness is appropriate here. Accidents happen in vehicles of all kinds. People die. It’s tragic. Nobody is perfect ( look in the mirror...) and automation can help but not fully prevent tragedies. Assigning 100% blame is too simplistic. It’s just sad.