Search results

Yeah that is exactly what I said. “Won’t fix having to use the accelerator.” However, there were multiple complaints, and manual mode fixes some of them (namely being able to reduce speed, which was a specific complaint). Advisable to read posts before disagreeing. We’ve been through this...

Manual mode! Won’t fix having to use the accelerator but you can certainly cap the speed using the scroll wheels. And no you cannot speed it up with the scroll wheels unless it is currently capped which is unusual (though possible). Added bonus (or detriment): it’s 100% identical to what...

Have you tried manual mode, lol? (Manual mode is identical to auto mode, as has been proven here, except for set speed offset.) Agreed it is terrible. The lane drifting is vaguely invigorating and amazingly consistent. I let it do a near kiss of a center divider right here at 50mph (usually...

Interesting, @Daniel in SD thinks Robotaxis are imminent (within next 5-10 years).

No one with current vehicles is getting Robotaxis. People just need to get over it and stop dreaming silly dreams.

Even I (who thinks most people use their turn signals, because laws and such and general decency and desire to not get in an accident) believe that every driver has failed to use their turn signal where required at least once in their driving career.

I suppose it is possible it started insanely hot and most of this was Cabin Overheat in the 10 hours it was active. In any case, very easy to tell if there is any question about it at the time.

I’ve paid attention to this before (recently!) and it is a remarkably high percentage of people who use turn signals when needed to signal their intent to turn. Certainly way more than half! Just good drivers in my area I guess. I am curious what the actual numbers are.

Evidence needed. People like to make this claim; I have never seen it backed up. Obviously 100% of drivers don’t use their turn signals sometimes. But that’s of course not the claim being made here.

The energy screen should give an idea of what is happening. If it is essentially uncategorized there could be an issue. But probably something mundane.

This seems poor given the setup. What happened, according to the screen?

Not enough GPUs? I have no idea at all.

Yeah just wonder what happens when they do all that and get a super sharp 50/50. I guess eventually it becomes a very rare event. Who knows. I can’t imagine it working any time soon given the extremely primitive nature of AI right now. Got a decade or two probably to really be good...

Seen no reports yet from vehicles. 2024 was 304 last I heard. It’s just a constant. Can be completely unrelated to battery capacity.

Might have been looking too fast.

That is definitely fine to do. And the batteries have held up well regardless, so far. Some people just like to minimize their capacity loss to maximize utility of the vehicle - for those very long stretches that you talk about it's nice to not have to worry about a Supercharger stop. And...

The blue dot is an interesting touch to add real legitimacy. Maybe AI suggested that.

Yeah sounded like he could get away with 60%.

The projected range at 0% will be zero. It is just the way it works. I understand your confusion but it does not work the logical way you would expect. If you drive at the efficiency it says, you don’t get the miles to 0% that it projects. If you go through the math you’ll see it all works...

To be clear, the consumption screen calculation, which you are using, and which I worked with a couple of other people to post here, INCLUDES THE BUFFER. It's detailed in the sticky as one of the caveats. It is confusing as you'd think the energy screen (which shows allegedly when you'd get to...

The dried remains of the young grasshopper are probably causing the intermittent wipes! I think they'd pick one or the other most of the time and stick to it! You just decide and then go. Obviously there are situations where you'd wobble, but that's usually because the inputs change (not...

That's incorrect. You'd have to supply information to support that. Remember that some apps report usable that actually includes the buffer, which is not usable by the typical definition. It's relatively easy to figure out how much usable (above 0%) you have if you do a long drive. Or you...

No. LG 78-79kWh when new, including the 4.5% buffer below 0% (~3.6kWh when new); usable is 75.4kWh when new, assuming pack capacity of 79kWh (they often start a bit low). All very straightforward. Just have to know the full pack capacity and then everything follows. Panasonic pack starts...

We’ll see. When it is perfectly trained, what does it do when it has two exactly equally correct scenarios? That is what I am curious about. Yes of course, as addressed in my post. Need to be able to change. Yes. Really? Significantly? As much as it will likely do without further...

There's definitely clickbait strategies as well. That could be just as much of an explanation. But in the end the strategy to counter has to be the same. The misperception of risks is not limited to Tesla. Existence does not mean a strategy or a bias.

It's not really an interesting example of anything. It's just garbage. Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence. The vast majority of "hit pieces" out there on Tesla are based on straight-up ignorance of Tesla and their software. And then the...

Your car is doing great and it sounds like the cool temperatures are doing it good. You can continue to get good results by keeping it below 55% most of the time, which sounds like it would be easy for you to accomplish. If you barely use it you could consider even lower but given the long...

Yeah, that's my point. Anyway you are using the wrong number, that is the reason - you were in average mode but you used 291km, the displayed current rated range, which is wrong. That's the wrong math. This should be 174Wh/km*261km/0.59 = 76.8kWh. 306mi or 493km That seems fine regardless...

So that's 493km, or 306 miles. You don't show the 291 or what mode the energy screen is in. But anyway, you don't need to. I guess providing it would allow us to calculate the energy or the constant, though. As mentioned you need to know the EPA range of your car. Since you have a MIC...

These data points don't make a lot of sense for a 2019. 267 is low for a 5-year-old LR Dual Motor (though certainly possible). That's 65.4kWh, which is down 16%. What doesn't make sense is that after four years the vehicle was down 7.5%, and now after 5 years it's down 16%. That's...

Be sure not to use instantaneous. Make sure you're using the "average" selection.

I wonder if end2end has any ability to make plans and stick to them (unless other circumstances dictate they can't be stuck to) or whether that is an inherent weakness of the approach? Very interesting. I wonder how many years it will take to develop the right approach which just takes care...

48.6kWh as expected. 7.4% capacity loss from initial ~52.5kWh. Excellent. (214Wh/mi*193mi/0.85 = 48.6kWh) 200rmi/0.9 = 222.2 rated miles, which is 92.6% of 240. (Also 7.4% loss, as expected.) These are really excellent results for this vehicle. Continue to keep it low and cold.

As you know, I am pretty familiar with this stuff. We know how it goes. True, as I made clear. We know it won’t be. But how is that relevant? They’re all the same basically - we know that! 12.3.x, 12.4, 12.5 - they just seem to be feature adds for the most part. Already seems to be...

Well if so they have not addressed speed control. (9:55, 11:15). Or decision wobble (11:40), (16:45). That dog won’t hunt. Disappointing. IF this is actually 12.4: Looks like it is going to be a few more years. No rapid progress. Hopefully 12.4 will be better. And we should ignore 12.5...

Feel free to address the issue in my original post. At any time. While the post is not clear, when I say “traffic on the freeway,” I mean stop-and-go or slow-moving traffic. I’m curious if AP is better. And hopefully v12 could do better but does not seem likely, since it clearly seems to...

Yes. That is what I keep on saying. Valid subset. Nope Yes. My words accurately described that I was talking about traffic on the freeway, and lacked sufficient specificity without further clarification. Nope Anyway this is all quite ridiculous. The point is I would like it to stop...

Incorrect. This is what I am talking about! And how is it relevant anyway? My complaint was about something very specific. By definition my story cannot change, as my description of the issue was 100% consistent throughout (stop-and-go traffic is a consistent subset of traffic). As I...

Definitely better. Both go to work.

Sorry yeah, misread...will correct the post. I just screwed up reading quickly. This car is fine, doing great actually. There have been reports of ones at 200 miles, though. From Florida. Posted elsewhere here with vehicles just a year or two old.

I have a 3 and would not be caught dead with a yoke. Ridiculous without drive by wire and it is no wonder everyone wants the car to steer for them if they have a yoke (which is ridiculously inconvenient to use).

This it is pretty common for these vehicles to have a little higher capacity loss. Not sure why. I believe 2019 was 240miles when new which was about 52.5kWh. [EDIT:] You're at 200@90%, so 222mi So you would be around 92.5%, 48.5kWh. This is really great and normal. Use the energy screen...

No

@MP3Mike is a sharp guy and knows his stuff. I don’t keep track of winning and losing arguments; it is of no consequence to me. All that matters is what is correct in the end.

I mean in person here. Complaints i have seem largely supported here. Some people it does not bother as much. But I was talking about whether there would be interventions.

This also supports what I am saying, regardless. There are multiple reasons for interventions regardless. And I am a perfectly normal driver. Everyone I know who has experienced FSD has the same complaints I have.

Someone who will gently press the accelerator when the car attempts to stop way before the stop line, so as to get it to stop at the actual line, especially when there is a trailing vehicle. Because that is just complying with traffic laws and norms.

Look, no actual normal person is going to use it without intervention with it behaving that way. End of story.

Bring it up in the context of v12 (aka v11 on the freeway). Just something I noticed. As others have said, maybe v12 will be better but at this point it’s a matter of telling Tesla to show us. And they are going to need to keep their mileage numbers up. TBD how they will accomplish that...

Please refer to prior posts.