SpaceX SN10 Prototype Explodes After Touchdown

SpaceX’s SN10 Starship prototype exploded Wednesday after a successful flight and touchdown.

The prototype soared more than 6 miles (10 kilometers) into the air, turned horizontal to control descent, then flipped back vertical for the landing. Minutes later the rocket exploded.

SpaceX has not said what caused the explosion.

Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted, “Starship 10 landed in one piece! RIP SN10, honorable discharge.”

He added: “SpaceX team is doing great work! One day, the true measure of success will be that Starship flights are commonplace.”

SpaceX’s two previous prototypes, SN9 and SN8, experienced failures just before landing.

The Starship is intended to be SpaceX’s vehicle to Mars.

Watch the broadcast above.

Grendal

SpaceX Moderator
Jan 31, 2012
5,739
6,983
Santa Fe, New Mexico
144896596_10159186821551543_4391862467405446916_o.jpg


Three Raptors installed and cryo test happened yesterday.
 

JohnnyEnglish

Member
May 7, 2018
230
1,057
UK
...landing with the new three engine initial burn. Hopefully the third time's the charm.
It will be fantastic if the three engine initial burn leads to a successful landing.

Really looking forward to them getting the heat shield on and testing re-entry techniques.
 

scaesare

Well-Known Member
Mar 14, 2013
8,230
13,161
NoVA
Last time I thought it over-rotated even with just one engine..
One of the things that struck me with the SN8 groundpad-camera perspective was the two engines gimbled in wildly opposite directions when trying to cancel out the rotation... certainly seems lack of the second engine to do that is why SN9 over-rotated:

sn8.png
 

Cosmacelf

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
8,380
19,967
San Diego
One of the things that struck me with the SN8 groundpad-camera perspective was the two engines gimbled in wildly opposite directions when trying to cancel out the rotation... certainly seems lack of the second engine to do that is why SN9 over-rotated:

View attachment 635581

The software probably wasn't programmed to take into account the possibility of only one engine working, since if that was the case, the rocket is lost anyways, so what's the point. That would mean you'd see all sorts of weirdness since the software was trying to control the rocket based on an an incorrect understanding of what was really going on.
 

miimura

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
6,070
5,650
Los Altos, CA
The software probably wasn't programmed to take into account the possibility of only one engine working, since if that was the case, the rocket is lost anyways, so what's the point. That would mean you'd see all sorts of weirdness since the software was trying to control the rocket based on an an incorrect understanding of what was really going on.
I would assume that they would have real time feedback of the thrust of each engine, based on strain gauges on the engine support structure. If that's the case, the computer knew there wasn't sufficient thrust and it was beyond the control parameters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grendal

Grendal

SpaceX Moderator
Jan 31, 2012
5,739
6,983
Santa Fe, New Mexico
Static Fire happened this morning. 55 minutes into this webcast. There was an issue with one of the Raptors and Elon tweeted that they will be replacing that one.

New Raptor has already been seen heading out to the pad to get switched out.
154162907_4067398839939832_2464616366360723143_o.jpg
 
Last edited: