T3slaTulips
Member
Last year's Q3 was on Nov 2, so it's earlier by one day (and I haven't looked to see if weekends played into either of those).Nice. It seems to be getting earlier and earlier in the quarter
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Last year's Q3 was on Nov 2, so it's earlier by one day (and I haven't looked to see if weekends played into either of those).Nice. It seems to be getting earlier and earlier in the quarter
So there's been all this talk about how 360 is an important price and that if TSLA got there then there would be a "breakout". Well, it got to 363 today. It there was a breakout I must have missed it.
Does this sort of thing actually burst anybody's bubble or is it just on to the next set of tea leaves (or triangles)?
Nice. It seems to be getting earlier and earlier in the quarter
This day still totally fits in the triangle. If we close above or in the vicinity of 363 its still on.
The media has been all over this 30th anniversary today. It garnered nearly a full page in the USA Today financial section. They sell fear so here it is. Other than that, the market was selling off toward close yesterday and this appears to be a continued liquidation....On Oct. 19, 1987, the S&P 500 plummeted 20.5 percent to wipe out what had been sizeable gains for the year.
Earnings season off with a bang, but since today is Oct 19th, market sentiment off the bat seems like driven by the above ...
Edit: This is not a Joke
Fundamentally that would make sense since nothing has changed. No news.Do. Not. Panic. This is going to be an intraday tail down.
Cool. From my email :Tsla ER November 1st
I don't dispute the popularity of Snapchat, and in fact I've been using it a bit lately, anytime a picture or video is useful it beats the *sugar* out of texting. I just dispute their ability to monetize it.You mean except for the ones who bought near the bottom in August. The IPO price was a ripoff but those recent buyers are WAY up. I'm not so sure it's not going to figure out how to monetize its base at some point. We've got some teens and they and all of their friends are on SNAP nonstop. FB can't quite seem to get rid of the little guy.
Ah, so it's just back to the triangles. Sorry, the conditions were met and nothing like a breakout happened. In fact, today we're plummeting. The experiment was performed and the result was not what was predicted, which means there's something wrong with your theory. Do you actually believe that when it closes "above or in the vicinity of 363" then there will be a "breakout"?
Me, I believe that when it closes above 363 then it will be above 363. And it will say nothing about what will happen the next day.
I can draw a triangle where this day is a breakout below the triangle if you wantAh, so it's just back to the triangles. Sorry, the conditions were met and nothing like a breakout happened. In fact, today we're plummeting. The experiment was performed and the result was not what was predicted, which means there's something wrong with your theory. Do you actually believe that when it closes "above or in the vicinity of 363" then there will be a "breakout"?
Me, I believe that when it closes above 363 then it will be above 363. And it will say nothing about what will happen the next day.
macro driven- leading economic indicator came in below expectations-Ugh. What's going on today, is it AAPL dragging everyone else down?
Ah, so it's just back to the triangles. Sorry, the conditions were met and nothing like a breakout happened. In fact, today we're plummeting. The experiment was performed and the result was not what was predicted, which means there's something wrong with your theory. Do you actually believe that when it closes "above or in the vicinity of 363" then there will be a "breakout"?
Me, I believe that when it closes above 363 then it will be above 363. And it will say nothing about what will happen the next day.
Totally agree.I don't dispute the popularity of Snapchat, and in fact I've been using it a bit lately, anytime a picture or video is useful it beats the *sugar* out of texting. I just dispute their ability to monetize it.
Ads in chat/messaging frameworks haven't worked well in the past. That's not to say it can't, I just haven't seen any compelling evidence that it can or that SNAP has some interesting new plan.
Also, yeah I meant IPO. There will always be projects who buy at local lows and make out like bandits. I sure wouldn't want to hold it long term though. I wouldn't even want to own it for this quarters ER.
Just sayin'. If it closes higher than this, which it almost certainly will, it will still look ok. Note intraday trips below support:
View attachment 254900
Technical trading is just a set of data points - not religion and certainly discount and don’t use if you think it’s silly. Having said that - if let’s say x% of the shares in a given day are traded by folks (or computers) who trade based on technical setups - wouldn’t you want to know what factors/indicators this group is looking at to either buy or sell shares - which can influence the price movements in the stock? Not trying to convince you to believe in anything - just pointing out something that’s obvious to me.
Tesla has no real comparable market peers or competitors in the public marketplace (correlation trading is relevant but not bankable) and you cannot look at PE ratios or multiples of ebitda to value so technicals become more of a relevant factor here for me to look at vs just investing into the abyss.