Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Elon & Twitter

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mastodon’s structure WAS and still IS too complicated for anyone who isn’t more tech or systems savvy.. it wasn’t built to be a mainstream social media platform. There are several alternate fast following companies that are moving to fill that void with a better solution. some of which have gained tremendous traction in the past couple months.
 
Remove SMS verification altogether. Done.

Nothing new. Tesla’s 2FA is also app based.

People can also jack your SIM and use it to receive your SMS messages.
 
Remove SMS verification altogether. Done.

Nothing new. Tesla’s 2FA is also app based.

Except they are keeping it for paid accounts, which shows it likely was more a financially motivated move than security motivated. As someone pointed out in the thread, Elon probably never seen the toll fraud details (even if true), just that they are getting a significant bill for the text messages being sent, which they can easily cut by disabling this feature.
 
Except they are keeping it for paid accounts, which shows it likely was more a financially motivated move than security motivated. As someone pointed out in the thread, Elon probably never seen the toll fraud details (even if true), just that they are getting a significant bill for the text messages being sent, which they can easily cut by disabling this feature.

I'm sure it's VERY financially motivated. I have clients that use SMS for 2FA and it's a VERY expensive validation mechanism for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SO16
Except they are keeping it for paid accounts, which shows it likely was more a financially motivated move than security motivated. As someone pointed out in the thread, Elon probably never seen the toll fraud details (even if true), just that they are getting a significant bill for the text messages being sent, which they can easily cut by disabling this feature.
For now. But will be disabled eventually I suspect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bkp_duke
I'm sure it's VERY financially motivated. I have clients that use SMS for 2FA and it's a VERY expensive validation mechanism for them.
For a sense of scale, it was already reported last year that Elon mentioned:
"During a live Spaces session early on Wednesday, Musk said that the microblogging site was being scammed "$60 million per year for SMS texts," not counting North America."
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: bkp_duke
For a sense of scale, it was already reported last year that Elon mentioned:
"During a live Spaces session early on Wednesday, Musk said that the microblogging site was being scammed "$60 million per year for SMS texts," not counting North America."

Thanks for that, falls about in line with what I have seen on smaller clients.

We build some websites for clients, and at their request (and our strong recommendation against) added SMS 2FA to their systems. In the first week these small businesses racked up $10k bills for SMS each because of abuse of the SMS system (tons of account sign-ups). We quickly moved them to something more secure, but it was a hard lesson for them.
 
Last edited:
Nice to know that money is more important than cybersecurity. 🤷‍♂️

Twitter’s two-factor authentication change “doesn’t make sense”

“On the surface, this sounds like a good degree of concern for users’ safety, but if you pay for Twitter Blue—and are, therefore, a customer who is serious about your Twitter usage and who Twitter should care about the most—you can continue to use that less secure method of authentication. Huh?” says Jim Fenton, an independent identity privacy and security consultant. “And if you aren't a Twitter Blue subscriber, and they downgrade you to just password-based authentication, now they've fully taken something that's purported to improve users’ security and done exactly the opposite.”
 
Just making sure we're all aware that the Babylon Bee is a satire site. This is a joke, not an actual poll.
The article from Babylon Bee is satire, but the poll result is very much real:

Only 26% of Americans hold a favorable opinion of the news media, Gallup and the Knight Foundation found — the lowest level recorded by the organizations over the last five years.

 
Last edited:
The article from Babylon Bee is satire, but the poll result is very much real:



CNN article goes into reasons why. People increasingly want the news to match their political biases rather than be a reporting of the truth. So it's obvious when the truth does not align with biases, they become less favorable of media that report on it. It then becomes a challenge for media if they stay truthful and factual or do they change their reporting to try not to offend one side. Basically the false balance problem:
False balance - Wikipedia
 
CNN article goes into reasons why. People increasingly want the news to match their political biases rather than be a reporting of the truth. So it's obvious when the truth does not align with biases, they become less favorable of media that report on it. It then becomes a challenge for media if they stay truthful and factual or do they change their reporting to try not to offend one side. Basically the false balance problem:
False balance - Wikipedia

Maybe there are two different things. Target groups wanting the media on their own side to be even more one sided, and the media on the other side to be more balanced. It's like climate change deniers asking the idealistic media to report on "both sides", all the while trying to discredit the scientific consensus.
 
Did you work at Twitter and were there for the lackadaisical work culture? By all accounts Twitter grew to be a huge success through this "lackadaisical" work culture. Space Karen is just being a d**** wielding power.
Maybe there are two different things. Target groups wanting the media on their own side to be even more one sided, and the media on the other side to be more balanced. It's like climate change deniers asking the idealistic media to report on "both sides", all the while trying to discredit the scientific consensus.
A good model for how to do things right is the media organization that tried to bring balance -- to uh, its bank accounts at least -- by reporting things that none of its staff actually believed true or accurate. That’s bending over backwards for us! Sad to think it likely will result in a damaging legal settlement.
Twitter’s management, meanwhile, seems to actually believe the various nutty fantasies, which is more admirable. At least to climate deniers, election deniers, vaccine deniers and white nationalists.
 
I guess advertising is important to twitter, after all.

Elon Musk keeps laying off Twitter employees after saying cuts were done

Dozens of Twitter employees across sales and engineering departments were laid off last week, including one of Musk’s direct reports who was managing engineering for Twitter’s ads business, according to company sources and social media posts from affected employees seen by The Verge. This means Musk has done at least three rounds of layoffs since his promise to stop doing them in November. Meanwhile, he has given a directive internally to revamp how ads are targeted in Twitter’s main feed within a week — part of his plan to fix what he has publically called “the worst ad relevance on Earth.” (The Information first reported that fresh cuts hit the sales team last week.)

Musk’s plan is to change Twitter’s ad targeting to work like Google’s search ads, which target primarily by keywords that are searched for, rather than a user’s activity and profile data. It’s an approach that works well for a search engine — where people go to express specific intent for finding something — and has helped Google build one of the most profitable businesses of all time. But it hasn’t worked for a social media business to date.
 
It’s the start finally of MICROPAYMENTS for the internets.. technically would be the next big thing.
Unless Twitter provides an API to integrate their payment system with third parties to pay for things, I don't think it's the next big thing, but just checking another feature off the list of things that other platforms already have. Calling it merely "coins" I suspect it's more a "tipping" system like Twitch (bits) and YouTube (super chat/super etc) have.

If this was PayPal 2.0 I think that it wouldn't be so boringly called "coins".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30seconds
Status
Not open for further replies.