AnalysisMember Articles

Understanding The Decline In Tesla’s FSD Take Rate

On August 31st, 2021, “Troy Teslike” tweeted data from his long running survey of thousands of Tesla vehicle buyers, showing a low take rate for FSD, Tesla’s “Full Self Driving” software add-on offered since late 2016. For Q2 2021, that survey shows a worldwide FSD take rate of only 11% across all Tesla models, compared to a high of 46% in Q2 2019. Rather than simply assuming this represents a major loss of confidence in FSD, it is worth examining the data and understanding the factors that led to this decline.

First, let’s look at the Q2 2019 spike in FSD take rate. In the span of two quarters, the take rate for the Model S rose from 33% to 81%, and for the Model 3, it rose from 15% to 46%.This can be explained by changes to Tesla’s self-driving packages and reduced pricing. Before February 28th, 2019 (late Q1 2019), Tesla offered Enhanced Autopilot (EAP) and FSD. EAP contained a less-polished version of all current Autopilot features, namely autosteer and auto cruise control, and some of today’s FSD features, including auto lane changes, Navigate on Autopilot, and Summon. FSD, at the time, offered no additional, working features, only the promise that Tesla would later avail buyers of autonomy features as the software improved. It stands to reason that, with no working features, FSD would have had a low take rate.  Then, on February 28th, 2019, Tesla stopped selling EAP, introduced a more basic Autopilot package priced at $3000, and began requiring buyers to purchase FSD for features formerly in EAP.  FSD, now priced at $5000, became a useful addition to the vehicle.

In the same Tesla announcement on that day, in addition to the FSD package receiving new features, Tesla offered sale prices on Autopilot and FSD for new vehicles. This was great for new car buyers and contributed to the spike in FSD take rates, but it had the potential to instantly decrease the resale value of existing owners’ vehicles. In response to backlash from existing owners, Elon Musk tweeted that Tesla would offer a discount on Autopilot and FSD for existing owners:

A table shown to Tesla’s customers at the time (and shared by Troy Teslike) clarifies the statement Elon made:

This substantial deal was a large motivator for many Tesla owners to purchase Autopilot and FSD at a large discount, and for the portion who had previously ordered and received vehicles with EAP, their vehicles were automatically upgraded to FSD at no additional cost. Given the discounts and package changes, the Q2 2019 spike in FSD purchases is understandable.

On a number of occasions over the years, Elon Musk has put forth FSD timelines that have proven to be overly optimistic. Without Elon’s high level of optimism, Tesla and SpaceX would almost certainly not be where they are today. At the same time, this has created unmet expectations among a number of potential FSD adopters. It is understandable that some pessimism surrounding FSD would have contributed to the decline in take rate following Q2 2019.

However, there are less concerning and more practical reasons as to why the take rate has tanked so much in the past two years. Price has been a key factor. Since Q2 2019, the price for FSD has gradually increased, but ultimately, it appears that the larger price difference between Autopilot and FSD, as well as the decrease in the average selling price of Tesla vehicles have been the primary causes of the take rate decline.

To give perspective on the overall price changes for FSD and Autopilot, a graph is provided below showing the FSD, Autopilot, and Enhanced Autopilot price changes over the past several years, along with a graph from Troy Teslike showing the Model S/X, Model 3, and Model Y FSD take rates in North America:

While the take rates have fluctuated a great deal, the combined price of FSD and Autopilot has surprisingly not fluctuated more than $2,000 in the past five years, aside from the early 2019 discounts. Arguably, the total price of FSD and Autopilot has been less significant than the price difference between FSD and Autopilot.

In Q4 2019, Tesla changed the price of Autopilot to $0, meaning its features (traffic aware cruise control and autosteer) were now included with each vehicle. At the time, FSD was priced at $7,000, and the combined cost of FSD and Autopilot dropped by $2,000.  However, this also changed the cost difference between FSD and EAP or Autopilot from $3,000 to $7,000. For many Tesla owners, Autopilot is quite useful and is considered an essential add-on, so when it had a price tag, it was relatively easy for buyers to justify spending $3,000 or $5,000 on it. Then, an additional $3,000 for FSD was not too hard to justify.

However, once Autopilot became standard on all Tesla vehicles, it became much harder to justify an additional $7,000 add-on for features that were considered less essential.  Since then, the price of FSD has further increased from $7,000 to $10,000, meaning there’s now a cost difference of $10,000 between Autopilot and FSD.  This is likely a key reason as to why the take rates for FSD have fallen so significantly.

In addition, it should be noted that the take rate for FSD with Model S/X vehicles has fallen significantly less compared to the Model 3/Y. This can be attributed to the Model 3/Y targeting a more price sensitive demographic. It is much easier to justify purchasing a $10,000 add-on for an $80,000+ vehicle than it is for a $40,000+ vehicle. Of course, Tesla’s sales growth in recent years has come from the Model 3/Y, thus lowering the average sale price.

Further, the global take rates for FSD have been much lower than for North America, as seen in this graph provided by Troy Teslike:

Troy states that “the FSD take rate is very low in China and APAC and they now represent a larger portion of Tesla’s global deliveries which reduces the global take rate.”  Tesla has been delivering increasing numbers in China and Europe. Unfortunately, Autopilot has been crippled in Europe for regulatory reasons, and FSD development has primarily taken place on U.S. roads. All, or virtually all, of the impressive, recent “FSD Beta” YouTube videos have been on North American roads. It is no wonder that take rates are lower overseas.

One might ask whether Tesla should take any steps to increase FSD uptake.

In fact, Tesla has started offering a reasonably affordable $199 a month subscription plan for FSD, allowing owners to try it out for just one month.  In addition, Tesla’s impressive efforts in 3D vision and labeling, neural networks, and accelerated training, as demonstrated at AI Day recently, have shown that the product will speak for itself once “FSD Beta” is polished enough to be released to the public.

The drop in FSD take rate is not as alarming as it might appear. Considering the early 2019 discounts, the increases in FSD marginal cost versus Autopilot, price sensitivity combined with declines in the average sale price of Tesla vehicles, and Autopilot/FSD performance lacking overseas, the relatively low take rate is understandable. It seems likely to trend upward soon.

IslandRoadster

Former Owner of #609
Nov 24, 2018
372
280
Bainbridge Island, WA
I think another factor, which is hard to capture with data, is that the people buying Teslas now are not, in large part, fan-boys like those of us that comment in the forums. They're car buyers, who just want a good car. Many FSD purchasers before were people who wanted to help the mission, to push electrification and the concept of FSD forward. We considered it an investment.

Now, the average car buyer doesn't want to invest in Tesla. They just want a nice car and they want something for their money. When there's *actual* full self-driving, they'll buy it. But for now, they're just not going to loan Tesla money. Early FSD adopters were willing to make that loan.
 

Chisale

Member
Sep 28, 2019
246
250
Ohio
Definitely agree with Island Roadster. If you're interested in seeing the advances in automated driving play out and have some extra money then it's fun being a purchaser of FSD. But if you ask the question: For the wider public is $10 grand for FSD a good deal? Then we all know the answer to that.
 

Twiglett

Single pedal driver
Oct 3, 2014
3,053
3,140
Austin
unsurprising really. The owner profile has changed from early adopter, so less likely to throw 10k at something that probably won't be delivered in the lifetime of a three year lease.
If they still sold EAP I'm sure lots of folks would go for it.
Right now they are being asked to pay $10k to be delivered EAP in terms of what is delivered but much more expensive than EAP.
I have FSD on my car, I'll be replacing it soon and also getting one for my wife. I have no intention of spending $10 per car for something that is still in beta. Heck, even AP is still beta but at least that's included. FSD might be worth money when it doesn't have the beta tag on it, but not before.
 

Ogre

Member
Sep 6, 2021
421
1,169
Oregon
Who really cares about putting the data in Troy's spreadsheets now ? As a % of sales the numbers are very low now - making them less & less reliable.

We have no idea what the actual take rate is.
I agree, people put too much credence in these crowd-sourced spreadsheets.

Often they get so clogged up it's difficult to just enter data into them. I certainly don't bother.

What happens when the spreadsheet's take rate drops below 0.1% of Tesla owners?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AquaY

phantom701

Member
Apr 16, 2016
26
20
San Francisco Bay Area
If they still sold EAP I'm sure lots of folks would go for it.
I'd agree. I would be happy to pay for EAP as I find it valuable to have the automated lane change and navigate from one freeway to another.

If Tesla charge $4,000 for EAP now and the take rate for EAP is another 15-20%, that's a lot of money for not having to do much. It's all software... Using the 500,000 delivery #s someone shared above, 20% of that @ $4,000 a piece is $400MM... all purely profit!!!

Hopefully they are reading this post :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdmdriving

Sporty

Member
Apr 20, 2019
181
145
Seattle
Renting seems like the way to go now. You can test it out and it would take over 4 years to pay the same amount. And if you don’t like it, you can cancel. Plus if you trade in for a new model you can move it to that car.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG_NJ

glide

Active Member
Jun 6, 2018
3,823
5,364
USA
Autopilot is so incredible on highways that FSD is not essential for people doing 90% highway driving. If Autopilot wasn’t included the take rate of FSD would be over 50%
And I’m sure Tesla would love to still be able to charge for standard autopilot. The fact is, many other companies have implemented auto lane keeping and auto lane change in vehicles that cost substantially less.
 

OrthoSurg

TSLA-digger
Jun 2, 2017
1,046
7,888
Montreal
And I’m sure Tesla would love to still be able to charge for standard autopilot. The fact is, many other companies have implemented auto lane keeping and auto lane change in vehicles that cost substantially less.
I think AP wasn’t included in the first SR Model 3 release but then they included it in the car and got the $4,000 AP price in the MSRP
 

qdeathstar

Completely Serious
May 17, 2019
3,811
4,040
VB
if you actually read the article, it's basically saying the take rate continues to be good.
And I’m sure Tesla would love to still be able to charge for standard autopilot. The fact is, many other companies have implemented auto lane keeping and auto lane change in vehicles that cost substantially less.
At least in the cars I have driven it doesn’t work nearly as well.
 

Products we're discussing on TMC...